Notes on Theatre: Suspension of Disbelief, Aesthetic Distance, and the Audience
- Event context: A live on-stage moment where a performer nicked skin and bled onto a paper towel, presented to the audience.
- Public reaction: The incident sent shock waves through the audience and across the country due to the live exposure of blood.
- Misinformation and official responses:
- Senator Jesse Helms claimed the project involved HIV-positive blood and “blood-soaked towels” winged over the audience; this was not true.
- The Minnesota Department of Health affirmed that safety precautions at the Walker Center were appropriate, yet political outcry persisted.
- Contrast with cinema: The same era’s bloody imagery in films (e.g., Quentin Tarantino’s Kill Bill volumes 1 and 2) did not provoke equivalent political backlash, underscoring how live performance can trigger different reactions than on-screen violence.
- Thematic intention: Athese or artist (the performer) used real blood to make a powerful statement about AIDS, but it blurred the lines between art and life.
Suspension of Disbelief
- Core idea: The audience temporarily accepts a fictional world and its events as if they could be real to enjoy the story.
- Purpose in theatre:
- To allow authentic emotional engagement (humor after a beating in a comedy; tears during poignant moments).
- To enable the audience to connect with the narrative while still engaging with it as a crafted piece of art.
- Examples illustrating tension with reality:
- Spamalot (2005): A Broadway musical based on Monty Python and the Holy Grail that builds a clearly fantastical world, inviting sustained disbelief for comedic effect.
- Night, Mother (1982): A realism-driven play depicting the last 90 minutes of a woman choosing to die; the production emphasizes real-time action and clocks to intensify the sense of reality, while the audience maintains an awareness that it is a staged event and not a real-life suicide.
Aesthetic Distance
- Definition: The audience’s ability to detach themselves from a work just enough to contemplate or judge it, rather than fully immersing and losing themselves in the experience.
- Consequences of too little distance:
- Complete immersion can lead to a lack of critical engagement with themes and artistry.
- Consequences of too much distance:
- Detached view may reduce empathy and entertainment value.
- Goal for most artists: Maintain a semi-objective stance that preserves empathy, allows reflection on themes and artistic merit, and still provides entertainment.
Brecht and Alienation (Verfremdungseffekt)
- Key idea (Bertolt Brecht, 1898−1956):
- The very nature of theatre invites audiences to distance themselves from the story rather than losing themselves to it.
- The aim is to challenge the audience, not merely to induce sympathy, so that they think critically about social and ethical implications.
- Practical implication: Brechtian techniques encourage spectators to interrogate the performance, recognize it as theatre, and consider its underlying messages rather than becoming emotionally absorbed.
Theatre Space and Audience Connection
- Quote from Robert Edmond Jones (theatre set designer):
- "Theatre is only an arrangement of seats so grouped and spaced that the actor—the leader—can reach out and touch and hold each member of his audience."
- Implications:
- The physical layout of a theatre is designed to facilitate intimate connection between performer and audience.
- Even as theatre becomes more immersive or technologically mediated, the core idea remains: the leader (actor) can engage each audience member on a personal level.
Real-world Examples and Comparative Dynamics
- Live performance risk and public perception:
- Real blood on stage provoked immediate political and moral debates about AIDS, risk, and artistic responsibility.
- Film vs live theatre:
- Blockbuster media with graphic violence (e.g., Kill Bill volumes 1 and 2) may attract large audiences but not the same political controversy triggered by a live stage moment.
- Artistic strategies:
- Some works seek to push boundaries to provoke discussion about social issues (e.g., AIDS) and measure the audience’s willingness to confront uncomfortable realities.
Ethical, Philosophical, and Practical Implications
- Ethics of risk in performance:
- Balancing safety with artistic impact when dealing with real substances, real-time audience reception, and potentially inflammatory topics.
- Role of intent vs. perception:
- The artist’s intention to comment on AIDS and social stigma versus the audience’s perception or misperception of the piece.
- Censorship and public policy considerations:
- How political figures may respond to provocative performances and how that shapes public funding and institutional support.
- Aesthetic theory and pedagogy:
- How the suspension of disbelief and aesthetic distance influence the learning and transformative potential of theatre.
Connections to Foundational Principles
- Distinction between illusion and reality:
- The audience can enjoy a story as fiction while recognizing its real-world significance.
- The role of the leader and the audience in theatre:
- The performer directly addresses or engages the audience, reinforcing the social contract of live performance.
- The relationship of theatre to life:
- Art mirrors life, but it also interprets, critiques, and reframes phenomena for reflection and discussion.
Notable Terms and Concepts (Glossary)
- Suspension of disbelief: extAtemporaryacceptanceofthenarrative′srealitytoenjoythestory.
- Aesthetic distance: extThedegreetowhichtheaudienceremainsself−awareandevaluativewhileengagingwiththework.
- Verfremdungseffekt (alienation): extBrechtiantechniquetopreventcompleteemotionalimmersionandencouragecriticaldetachment.
- Semi-objective engagement: extBalancingempathywithcriticalanalysistoappreciatebothentertainmentandartisticmerit.
- Illusion vs. reality in theatre: extThetensionbetweenthetheatre’sconstructednatureanditscapacitytoilluminatereal−worldissues.
- Leader-audience dynamic: extTheperformer’sproximitytoaudiencemembers,enablingdirectorfeltcontact.
Summary Takeaways
- Live theatre can provoke strong political and ethical reactions when real-world issues are dramatized or highlighted in a direct manner.
- The interplay between suspension of disbelief and aesthetic distance shapes how audiences experience, interpret, and judge a performance.
- Brechtian ideas advocate for alienation to foster critical thought rather than pure emotional absorption.
- The physical arrangement of the theatre space and the performer's approach to the audience influence the intimacy and immediacy of the experience.
- Classic and contemporary works use different strategies to engage audiences: some emphasize fantasy and spectacle (e.g., 2005 Spamalot), while others emphasize realism and real-time engagement (e.g., 1982 Night, Mother).