Each term in the ODE must have the same total degree in its variables.
Works even if the variables are different (e.g., x in one term, y in another) as long as the sum of exponents in each term is identical.
Example with a square‐root term: you can factor out x2 or y2 to reveal common degree; homogeneity is preserved.
Practical test
Replace x→kx and y→ky.
If the whole expression scales by km for some single m, the equation is homogeneous.
Standard substitution for homogeneous first–order ODEs
Set v=xy⇒y=vx,dxdy=v+xdxdv.
Goal after substitution: convert to a separable ODE and integrate ("antiderivative frenzy").
Bernoulli Equations
Canonical form dxdy+P(x)y=Q(x)yn,n=0,1
Transformation that makes it linear
Let v=y1−n(or v=y1−n).
Then dxdv=(1−n)y−ndxdy.
Substituting converts the Bernoulli equation into dxdv+(1−n)P(x)v=(1−n)Q(x)
which is linear in v.
Solve the linear equation with the integrating‐factor method
Integrating factor μ(x)=exp(∫(1−n)P(x)dx)
General solution in v, then back‐substitute y=v1/(1−n).
Walk-Through Example (n = −1)
Starting ODE (after instructor divided by 2xy): dxdy−y1=x1y−1 (implicitly n=−1).
Identify parameters P(x)=−y1(P here is actually a constant wrt x),Q(x)=x1,n=−1.
Bernoulli substitution v=y1−(−1)=y2.
Derivative link dxdv=2ydxdy; solve dxdy from the ODE and replace.
Obtain the linear dv/dx equation, find integrating factor μ(x), integrate once, then substitute back y=v.
Final implicit solution: typical form y2=Cxα+f(x) with constants determined by integration.
Secondary Example (n = 4/3)
Instructor identified n=34 during board work.
Substitution: v=y1−34=y−31.
Derived derivative: dxdv=−31y−34dxdy.
After algebra: a linear ODE in v of the form dxdv+(−34⋅(some coefficient))v=rhs(x).
Same integrating‐factor steps follow.
Exam & Study Tips Mentioned
"Antiderivative" work pervades this course — every technique aims to produce an integral you can evaluate.
When you open any new problem, mentally check the hierarchy:
Is the ODE separable?
Is it homogeneous (use v=y/x)?
Does it match Bernoulli form?
Could it be exact?
Expected test timing: if a Bernoulli or homogeneous problem is allocated ∼7 min on Test 1, plan for ∼5 min on the final.
Homework counts 85 % of its stated value; turn it in before in-class review for any credit.
Exact Differential Equations
Structure M(x,y)dx+N(x,y)dy=0.
Exactness criterion ∂y∂M=∂x∂Non a simply-connected region R=[a,b]×[c,d].
Consequence: there exists a potential function F(x,y) such that dF=∂x∂Fdx+∂y∂Fdy=Mdx+Ndy.
Therefore M=∂x∂F,N=∂y∂F.
Solving algorithm
Verify exactness using the partial-derivative test.
Integrate M w.r.t. x (treat y as constant) to get F(x,y)=∫Mdx+C1(y).
• Note: the "constant" of integration becomes an unknown function of y because partial integration regards y as a parameter.
Differentiate this preliminary F with respect to y: ∂F/∂y.
Set the result equal to the given N(x,y) and solve for C<em>1′(y); integrate to discover C</em>1(y).
Write the implicit solution F(x,y)=C (true constant).
Mini-Example worked on the board
Given M=3x2y−xy3 and N=… (full N wasn’t captured in transcript).
Integration w.r.t x produced F(x,y)=3x2y−xy3+C1(y).
Differentiate w.r.t y, equate to N, determine C1(y), then state F=C.
Key takeaway: $C_1$ is a function of y only, not a pure constant.
Multivariable & Line-Integral Connection
Exact equations mirror the gradient theorem in calculus III.
In line integrals, if a vector field F=⟨M,N⟩ is conservative, then the work integral along any path only depends on end-points — same potential function F(x,y).
The differential-equation test ∂M/∂y=∂N/∂x is identical to the curl-free condition for 2-D vector fields.
Real-World Contexts Mentioned
Flight trajectories in tightly managed airspace
Airlines follow pre-computed "logarithm-like" level paths to guarantee safe gaps; underlying calculations are differential-equation based.
Water current vs. swimmer problems (classic relative-motion ODEs).
Economic models — rapid parameter changes often modeled with first-order DEs.
Common Pitfalls & Instructor Comments
Do not confuse separable, homogeneous, and exact; each has its own fingerprint.
Fractions can obscure pattern recognition; consider clearing denominators early.
Double-inverse trigonometric substitutions (e.g., undoing arctan then applying tan again) might appear but probably avoided on early tests.
Practice reduces solution time; otherwise algebraic slips (especially with exponents like 34) can derail the entire problem.
Quick Reference Formulas
Bernoulli integrating factor: μ(x)=e∫(1−n)P(x)dx
Exactness test: ∂y∂M=∂x∂N
Potential function reconstruction: F(x,y)=∫Mdx+C<em>1(y),C</em>1′(y)=N−∂y∂(∫Mdx).