Democracy
The Common Good
Definition: The ideal that society should aim for; “the greatest good for the greatest number.”
Democracy seeks to serve the common good, but interpretations vary.
Key themes:
Virtuous and noble life.
Political equality: Society functions when members commit to living together as a unity.
Egalitarian societies emerge when ideas of the common good are embraced.
Thinkers on the Common Good
Locke: Create better political conditions to achieve personal goals.
Marx: Elites use the idea of the common good for selfish purposes, disguising personal gain as collective benefit.
Democracy: Definitions
Core definition: Institutions built around competitive elections, allowing all adults to choose/remove leaders; equality and wide political participation emphasized.
Modern/working definition: Political power exercised directly or indirectly, through participation, competition, and liberty; open to multiple interpretations.
Critiques and Models
Six Nations Model
Democracy not strictly European; Indigenous governance shows consultative, participatory democracy.
Great Law of Peace: Allowed Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca, and Tuscarora to coexist for 200+ years.
Leadership measured by generosity, not hoarding.
Leaders could be removed if responsibilities not met.
Checks and balances recognized; community accountability was crucial.
Historical misrepresentation: Indigenous democratic practices erased or misrepresented (e.g., women’s suffrage, recall mechanisms).
Democratic Theory
European context: Church and monarchies (hereditary leadership) clashed; common people gained rights.
Emergence of social constructs between city and state; rule of law applied equally.
Contemporary Thinkers
Harm Principle (Stuart Mill):
Freedom of speech allowed but limited by the principle: cannot harm others or infringe on others’ freedom.
Recognizes limits to freedom.
Political Economy & Influence
Focus on minimizing the gap between rich and poor.
Economic inequality undermines true democratic participation.
Ted Talk & Money in Democracy
Money primary: Candidates’ nominations controlled by a small elite (0.2%), similar in US and China.
Boss Tweed analogy: Controlling nominations = controlling outcomes; democracy undermined.
Effect: Economic elites influence policies; average citizens’ preferences often ignored.
Jury mandoring: Manipulation of voting boundaries to favor certain candidates.
Neutralizing this influence = empowering democracy for the people.
Radical Critiques
Karl Marx:
Real power lies in controlling means of production, not just political institutions.
Capitalism without checks leads to economic inequality.
Unions (e.g., Canadian teachers) provide checks and balances.
Radical Democracy
Requires citizen involvement outside formal structures.
Citizens can challenge lawmaking, the rule of law, or democracy itself.
Double-edged: Risk if elected leaders remove checks and balances.
Declining Democracy
Global trend of declining support for democratic institutions.
Democracies may support dictatorships abroad while preaching democracy at home.
Hypocrisy leads to weakening of democratic principles.
Left and Right
Origins: French Revolution (Left = people, Right = monarchy/elite).
Radical ideas exist on both sides; commitment may vary.
Meta-narratives:
Left: deregulation, maximize profit.
Right: regulation, protect citizens.
Political parties may enforce rigid adherence to narratives (“all or nothing”).