ASC 104 – Young People, Religion, Spirituality & Society

Lecture Setting and Housekeeping

  • Module position & transition

    • Last lecture in the “Young People” block of ASC 104.

    • Next week Kim begins a 33-week block on Health; later blocks cover Sport & Leisure (Kim) and Deviance & Social Movements (Matteo).

  • Past content recap

    • Week 2: Youth Culture & Society – definitions of youth, youth as a social construction.

    • Week 3: Young People & Healthy Lives – vaping likely to feature in essay questions.

  • Upcoming assessments & support

    • Major Assignment 1 (inter-generational interview) due Monday; some students have already submitted.

    • PASS session (Peer Assisted Study Session) with Shania: covers Week 3 content, Word formatting, Turnitin, and assignment Q&A.

  • Lecture focus today:

    • Young people’s “inner worlds” → religion & spirituality.

    • Structure: historical context, sociological imagination, empirical patterns, generational analysis, contemporary typology.

Sociological Framework

  • C. W. Mills’ Sociological Imagination – four analytic lenses: historical, structural, cultural, critical.

  • Reason for the historical lens: present youth religiosity cannot be understood without past context; generational thinking featured in both lecture and Assignment 1.

  • Age–Period–Cohort (APC) “magic formula”

    • Age effect: most impressionable years 1324\approx 13\text{–}24 → value formation.

    • Period effect: events/issues (e.g.\, climate change, wars) affect all, but differently by age.

    • Cohort effect: shared formative milieu makes peers more similar to one another than to other generations.

Media Narratives About Youth & Spirituality

  • Narrative 11 – “Alternative spirituality boom” (tarot, astrology).

    • ABC Radio National program discussed uptick; lecturer was a guest.

  • Narrative 22Multiculturalism ⇒ Religious diversity.

    • Daughter’s grade-66 artwork: five girls (Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist) holding hands – symbol of everyday tolerance.

    • Photo (March 20192019): Pacifica Christian students comforting Muslim classmates outside Lakemba Mosque after Christchurch massacre – real-world solidarity.

  • Narrative 33 – “Most youth reject organised religion” – becomes central proposition to test empirically.

Australia in the Late 1950s1950\text{s} / Early 1960s1960\text{s} (Historical Benchmark)

  • Cultural landscape

    • Less ethnic diversity; predominance of nuclear families; smoking common.

    • Australia could meaningfully be called a Christian country.

  • Empirical indicators

    • Christian affiliation near-universal (>90\%).

    • Regular church attendance 50%\ge 50\% monthly.

    • High belief in God, afterlife, angels, etc.

  • Public embedding

    • Suburban churches filled with children (Sunday School).

    • MCG Billy Graham crusade 19591959: crowd =130,000=130{,}000 (largest in stadium history; 2%\approx 2\% of national population attended rallies).

    • Church dances & sports clubs as dating, leisure, and community hubs – pre-dating-apps social centre.

Statistical Trajectory of Religion in Australia

  • Data sources

    • Census every 55 years (religious affiliation item: open-ended).

    • 20012001: 70,000\approx 70{,}000 wrote “Jedi Knight”.

    • Attitudinal surveys: 1960s,1960\text{s}, 1990s,1990\text{s}, 2020s2020\text{s}.

  • Affiliation trends

    • Anglicans: \downarrow from 40%\approx 40\% to 10%10\%.

    • Catholics: gentler decline – propped by Catholic schooling pathway.

    • No religion: now single largest category.

    • World religions (Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Judaism) collectively 10%\ge 10\% – growth driven mainly by immigration, not conversion.

  • Attendance trends

    • Early 1960s:1960\text{s}: 50%\ge 50\% monthly; majority at least annually.

    • Today: minority attend; highest among Pentecostals, Mormons, Muslims.

Generational Patterns (2021 Census Snapshot)

Generation

Age in 20212021

Christian

Other Religions

No Religion

Not Stated

Alpha

090\text{–}9

High proxy (parent-reported)

Z

102510\text{–}25

<30\%

>10\%

>50\%

10%\approx 10\%

Millennial

264126\text{–}41

30%\approx 30\%

10%\approx 10\%

Plurality 45%\approx 45\%

10%\approx 10\%

Gen X

425742\text{–}57

>40\%

<10\%

35%\approx 35\%

10%\approx 10\%

Boomer

587658\text{–}76

>55\%

<5\%

25%\approx 25\%

10%\approx 10\%

Inter-war

77+77+

65%\approx 65\%

<3\%

20%\approx 20\%

10%\approx 10\%

Key takeaway: Younger cohorts = less Christian, more religiously diverse, more non-religious.

Generational “Life-Stage” Experience Profiles

  • 1950s teens (Inter-war gen)

    • Christianity normalised; church = social nexus; Billy Graham as celebrity; sport & dating run through parishes.

  • Baby Boomers (teens 1960s!70s1960\text{s}!\text{–}70\text{s})

    • Counter-culture, Vietnam protests, liberalising divorce/birth-control laws.

    • Rise of New Age, Eastern philosophies, psychedelic spirituality (Ouija boards, yoga, Hindu/Buddhist influences).

    • Cultural icons: The Beatles’ India retreat, Woodstock 19691969 (500,000 attendees)\left( \approx 500{,}000 \text{ attendees} \right); Sunbury Festival 1973/741973/74 (AU analogue, 40,000\approx 40{,}000).

  • Gen Z (current youth)

    • Highly secular public sphere; unprecedented cultural diversity.

    • Low religious literacy: RE optional, replaced by “Values Education”.

    • Well-being curricula → exposure to yoga & mindfulness (compulsory classes).

    • Iconic figure: Taylor Swift, not Billy Graham – shift from evangelical figureheads to secular pop culture.

Comparative National Teen Surveys (Millennials 20052005 vs Gen Z 20172017)

Indicator

20052005 (% agree/practise)

20172017

Change

Believe in God

50%\approx 50\%

40%\approx 40\%

\downarrow

Believe life after death

45%\approx 45\%

35%\approx 35\%

\downarrow

Believe in angels

40%\approx 40\%

30%\approx 30\%

\downarrow

Attend worship \ge monthly

25%\approx 25\%

15%\approx 15\%

\downarrow

Believe in reincarnation

30%\approx 30\%

30%\approx 30\%

Believe in astrology

25%\approx 25\%

25%\approx 25\%

Believe contact with dead possible

25%\approx 25\%

25%\approx 25\%

Tried Tarot

10%\approx 10\%

10%\approx 10\%

Practised meditation

15%\approx 15\%

35%\approx 35\%

\uparrow (school well-being programs)

Practised yoga

12%\approx 12\%

30%\approx 30\%

\uparrow (school well-being programs)

Media claim of explosive tarot/astrology growth is overstated; biggest real rise = mindfulness/yoga exposure.

The Australian Generation Z Project (ARC-funded)

  • Funding & scope: A$500,000A\$500{,}000 ARC Discovery grant.

  • Mixed methods design

    • 30\approx 30 focus groups in diverse schools (incl.\, remote WA).

    • National telephone survey (1,200\approx 1{,}200 respondents; cost A$300,000\approx A\$300{,}000) – last feasible phone survey with teens (mobile non-response + parental consent hurdles).

    • Follow-up qualitative interviews for validity checking.

  • Analysis tool: Latent Class Analysis (LCA) – groups individuals by pattern similarity across dozens of items (religious, spiritual, secular, sceptical).

Sixfold Typology of Teen Religion/Spirituality

Segment

Share

Core Features

Typical Background

Religiously Committed

17%17\%

Faith central; high practice; confident belief.

Pentecostal, LDS, Muslim; note social cost in secular AU.

Nominally (Culturally) Religious

20%20\%

Identify via heritage; low practice/knowledge; “Christmas-&-Easter Catholics”.

Predominantly Catholic youths in Catholic school system.

Spiritual Seekers

8%8\%

Combine horoscopes, reincarnation, tarot and some doctrinal knowledge; eclectic.

Often Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh heritage; skew 1818-year-old females.

Spiritual-but-Not-Religious (SBNR)

18%18\%

Reject institutional religion; open to metaphysical ideas (reincarnation, astrology, energies).

Broad demographic.

Indifferent

15%15\%

Simply uninterested; existential questions low salience; focus on gaming, daily life.

Mixed; “couldn’t care less.”

This-Worldly Secularists

23%23\%

Humanist/scientific worldview; explicit disbelief in supernatural; largest single block yet minority overall.

Diverse; value science & rationalism.

Aggregated insight: 75%\approx 75\% of teens retain some spiritual or religious orientation; outright secular-humanist stance not overwhelming majority.

Practical & Theoretical Implications

  • Educational: Declining religious literacy suggests need for nuanced teaching on belief diversity to avoid stereotypes.

  • Social policy: Community services & mental-health programs must consider alternative spiritual practices (mindfulness, yoga) now woven into secular settings.

  • Research: Future sampling may rely on school-based or online panels; phone surveys with minors near-impossible.

  • Generational forecasting: As Gen Z ages, “no-religion” affiliation likely to keep rising, but interest in individualised spirituality may persist.

  • Essay prompts:

    • Evaluate media claims of a tarot/astrology boom vs empirical data.

    • Analyse how APC model explains differing religious outcomes across cohorts.

    • Discuss policy or pedagogical responses to low religious literacy in multicultural classrooms.

Course Timeline Look-Ahead

  • Week 4–6: Kim – Health (start), Sport & Leisure (later).

  • Week 7–9: Matteo – Deviance & Social Movements.

  • Week 11: Lecturer (Andrew) returns for final sessions; essay list released by end of this week.


End of detailed study notes – designed to replace the full lecture recording/transcript.