ADR & Drug-Drug Interactions

Monitoring and Adverse Drug Reactions in Clinical Trials

Controlled Trials

  • Patients are closely monitored in controlled trials with experienced practitioners evaluating them.
  • In clinical practice, patients may experience more variability after a drug is approved.
    • Unique treatment due to individual patient characteristics.
    • Example: Alpha-labeled uses of drugs that differ from trial conditions.

Adherence Issues

  • Adherence to medication regimens can be suboptimal.
    • Some patients may take medications as intended, while others may not.
  • Patients are typically seen less frequently in clinical practice compared to clinical trials, where scheduled monitoring occurs.

Role of the FDA in Monitoring ADRs

  • The FDA can respond to emerging information regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by:
    • Updating product labeling including package inserts.
    • Including a black box warning at the top of the insert for serious adverse events.
    • Requiring the implementation of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for drugs with a black box warning.
    • Possible removal of drugs from the market if significant safety concerns arise.
REMS Details
  • REMS may be required even before the drug is available on the market.
  • Components of REMS may include:
    • Medication guides for prescribers.
    • Communications about risks to prescribers.
    • Special training for prescribers utilizing the medication.

Example of Adverse Drug Reaction

  • Case Study: 33-year-old male with increasing fatigue and appetite loss 10 days after starting Trovium for an infection.
    • Physical exam showed mild jaundice and elevated liver function tests (LFTs).
  • Literature Search Findings:
    • Original labeling indicated possible LFT increases after 21 days of therapy; safety beyond four weeks unstudied.
    • Trovium was widely prescribed without reports of liver injury in premarketing trials.
    • After marketing, numerous liver injury reports prompted FDA action to update labeling and restrict usage.
    • By 2002, Trovium was discontinued due to safety concerns.

Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions

  • Pharmacists can report ADRs.
    • Reporting through FDA MedWatch is encouraged but not mandatory for pharmacists.
    • Physician reporting is not mandatory either.
    • However, manufacturers are required to report ADRs.
Limitations of Pre-marketing Data
  • Product labeling is mostly based on pre-marketing data, which has significant limitations:
    • Small sample sizes from clinical trials.
    • Trials have a limited duration and may not capture rare or long-term ADRs.
    • Generally higher adherence in trials than in real-world settings.
  • Post-marketing data is essential for discovering long-term safety and efficacy beyond initial studies.

Adverse Drug Reaction Evaluation Strategy

Patient Assessment
  • For assessing ADRs, consider key factors about the patient:
    • Age (pediatric or geriatric).
    • Liver and kidney function.
    • Allergy history including specific allergies.
Drug Assessment
  • Questions include:
    • Onset of the drug therapy and dosing details (any changes?).
    • Concurrent medications (any recent changes?).
    • Laboratory tests related to ADRs (e.g., liver tests).
Literature Search
  • Begin with tertiary literature for drug information:
    • Examples include Lexicomp, Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex.
  • Review references for recency and relevance.
Secondary and Primary Literature
  • Use secondary resources like PubMed for primary literature, such as:
    • Animal studies and observational studies like case-control or cohort studies.
    • Most importantly, focus on case reports which provide anecdotal evidence of ADRs.

Understanding Case Reports

  • Case reports are detailed accounts of individual patient experiences with specific drugs.
    • They describe new or unusual effects and can identify potential ADRs.
    • Often published in journals with a structured format:
    • Abstract summarizing the article.
    • Introduction detailing drug and effects.
    • Case presentation with diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.
    • Discussion comparing findings with prior reports.
Importance of Temporal and Dose Relationships
  • Temporal Relationship: Time between drug administration and ADR onset.
    • Essential for establishing causation.
  • Dose Relationship: Changes in drug dosage impacting reactions.
  • D-Challenge and Re-Challenge: Evaluating the resolution of symptoms post-drug withdrawal and re-administration effects.

Assessing Causality with the Naranjo Algorithm

  • Naranjo Algorithm assesses the likelihood that an ADR relates to a drug with 10 yes/no questions.
    • Gives a score ranging from less than 1 to about 9, indicating levels of probability from unlikely to probable.
    • Recognizes that most cases will be assessed without rechallenge due to ethical concerns.

Summary of Key Points on Adverse Drug Reactions

  • Premarketing data is often limited, highlighting the importance of pharmacist and manufacturer reporting for ADRs.
  • Case reports are crucial for identifying ADRs and interactions, often being the initial evidence for emerging safety issues.
  • The Naranjo algorithm is widely accepted to assess ADR causality, but understanding the limitations and context of the data is essential.
Upcoming Assignments
  • Future assignments will involve evaluating case reports utilizing the Naranjo algorithm to determine ADR causality.