Species Interactions and Coevolution

Topic 16: Species Interactions Continued

Relationships Between Species in a Community

  • Interspecific interactions consider how the interaction affects each species.
  • The interaction can have one of three outcomes for each species:
      - Positive (+)
      - Negative (-)
      - Neutral (0)

Types of Interspecific Interactions

  • Species A and B interactions:
      - + - 0
      - Mutualism (+/+)
      - Predation (+/-)
      - Grazing (+/-)
      - Parasitism (+/-)
        - Types of Parasitism:
          - Endoparasitism
          - Ectoparasitism
          - Behavioral Parasitism
      - Parasitoidism (+/-)
      - Interspecific Competition (-/-)
      - Commensalism (+/0)
      - Amensalism (-/0)
      - Neutralism (0/0)

Learning Objectives

  • After completing this lecture, you should be able to:
      1. Understand the different categories of interspecific interactions, including subtypes:
         A. Grazing
         B. Predation
         C. Parasitism (endo, ecto, behavioral)
         D. Parasitoidism
      2. Explain the ecological and evolutionary effects of +/- interactions:
         A. Lotka-Volterra predator-prey models
         B. Adaptations of predators and prey
      3. Define coevolution and the Red Queen Principle
      4. Understand how coevolution occurs in response to:
         A. Mutualistic interactions
         B. Antagonistic interactions
      5. Contrast exponential, logistic, competition, & predator-prey models
      6. Recognize the different types of mutualism (obligate and facultative), commensalism, and amensalism

Classification of +/- Interactions

  • Classifications based on two factors:
      - Duration of interaction
      - Extent of lethality
  • Categories:
      1. Grazer:
         - Consumes part of prey non-lethally in a short interaction
      2. Predator:
         - Kills and consumes prey lethally in a short interaction
      3. Parasite:
         - Harms a host non-lethally over a long period
      4. Parasitoid:
         - Long-term relationship that is lethal to the host

Types of Interactions

Grazing (+/-)
  • One species quickly consumes another in a non-lethal manner, often involving plants or algae as prey.
Predation (+/-)
  • One species quickly consumes another lethally.
  • Predator and Prey dynamic is characterized by a predator actively hunting and killing its food.
Parasitism (+/-)
  • One species harms the other non-lethally, often over an extended period.
  • Types of Parasitism:
      1. Endoparasitism:
         - Examples include heartworms, tapeworms, and Plasmodium (malaria).
      2. Ectoparasitism:
         - Examples include ticks, lice, and lampreys that feed on external surfaces of hosts.
      3. Behavioral Parasitism:
         - The parasite harms the host without residing on or in it.
         - Example: Brood parasites like the European Cuckoo and Brown-headed Cowbird manipulate host behaviors for their benefit.
Parasitoidism (+/-)
  • One species harms another lethally over a long period.
  • Typically involves a parasitoid, which lays eggs on host organisms.

Remaining Species Interactions

  • Commensalism (+/0):
      - One species benefits while the other is neither helped nor harmed.
      - Example: Sea cucumber and crab; cattle egret with cattle.

  • Amensalism (-/0):
      - One species is harmed while the other is unaffected.

Effects of +/- Interactions

  • Example of predator-prey dynamics between snowshoe hares and lynx over years.
      - Years: 1850, 1875, 1900, 1925
      - Hare Population (Thousands): 160, 120, 80, 40
      - Lynx Population (Thousands): 9, 6, 3, 0
  • Ecologically: These interactions create cycles in predator-prey dynamics.
  • Evolutionarily: Adaptations arise to increase survival and reproductive success.

Modeling Predator-Prey Dynamics

  • Lotka-Volterra equations help model these interactions.

  • Prey Growth:
    dNprey/dt=rNprey(cNprey)PdN_{prey}/dt = rN_{prey} - (cN_{prey}) P
      - Where:
        - NpreyN_{prey}: prey population
        - PP: predator population
        - cc: capture efficiency (per capita death rate of prey per predator)

  • Example of Prey Growth:
      - Given values: Nprey=100N_{prey} = 100, r=2r = 2, P=10P = 10, c=0.01c = 0.01
      - dNprey/dt=(2100)(0.01100)10dN_{prey}/dt = (2 * 100) - (0.01 * 100) * 10
      - Calculation:
    dNprey/dt=20010=190dN_{prey}/dt = 200 - 10 = 190

  • Predator Growth:
    dP/dt=b(cNprey)PdPdP/dt = b(cN_{prey})P - dP
      - Where:
        - bb: conversion efficiency
        - dd: death rate (per capita death rate of predator)
      - Example: If Nprey=100N_{prey} = 100, P=10P = 10, b=1.25b = 1.25, d=0.1d = 0.1, then:
    dP/dt=1.25(0.1100)10(0.110)dP/dt = 1.25(0.1 * 100) * 10 - (0.1 * 10)
    dP/dt=12.51=11.5dP/dt = 12.5 - 1 = 11.5

Adaptations to +/- Interactions

  • Adaptations occur to enhance success rates in these interactions, such as:
      1. Hiding: Cryptic coloration examples include caterpillars and ptarmigans.
      2. Countershading: Provides camouflage in both land and aquatic environments.
      3. Deception/Mimicry: Mimicking features to confuse predators or prey.
      4. Mechanical Defenses: Physical adaptations such as armor or spines.
      5. Agility: Enhancing speed for evasion or pursuit.
      6. Living in Groups: Increased survival probability through flocking behavior.
      7. Masting: Synchronizing reproduction in prey to overwhelm predator consumption.
      8. Alarm Calls and Mobbing: Warning calls or collective deterrence of threats.
      9. Chemical Defenses: Use of toxins for both offensive and defensive purposes.

Coevolution

  • Defined as the process where two species respond to each other's adaptations over time.
  • Mutualism: Benefits both species involved through specific adaptations (e.g., pollinators and plants).
  • Antagonistic Interactions: Each party adapts to counteract the other's advantages, such as predator-prey dynamics leading to natural selection.

The Red Queen Principle

  • States that species must continually adapt to maintain their relative fitness due to constant competitive pressures.
  • Example: The adaptation in coloration in mimicry, where a non-toxic species evolves to resemble a toxic one, requiring both species to continue to evolve to retain their survival strategies.