Introduction to Public Choice - 1. Public choice and public policy

  • Public choice applies the methods of economics to analyze political decision-making.

    • Looking at how the individuals in the political process make their own individual decisions.

    • How do they make choice and their consequences.

  • The public choice approach analyses the way that political decision-making actually takes place,

    • whereas public policy analysis too often describes the way an ideal political decision-making process might work.

Individual choice in markets versus collective choice in government

  • Economics help to understand how markets allocate resources

    • It is also important to understand how government allocates resources under its control

    • In the USA, more than a third of economic activity occurs through gov

  • Through gov, a single choice is made for all.

    • Compared to markets, where each individual chooses.

  • In markets, transactions are voluntary.

    • In gov, taxes and regulations are imposed by force.

  • The government's activities are a result of the collective choices of individuals as voters and lobbyists.

    • Many activities of government would be difficult to undertake through individual transactions.

    • Ex., roads, water supplies, waste treatment facilities, law and order.

Economic analysis and public choice

  • Most economic analysis of government does not use a public choice perspective.

    • The typical economic approach is to look at reasons why markets fail, and then derive policies that would result in an efficient allocation of resources.

  • Markets fail because: externalities, public goods, monopolies, informational asymmetries, etc.

  • This methodology compares the real-world economy to an ideal outcome that could be produced under certain assumptions.

    • But those assumptions are rarely able to be met in the real world.

    • The two big problems are information and incentives.

  • To compare outcomes in the real-world economy with some theoretical ideal optimum is misleading, and can lead to public policies that do more harm than good.

  • Public choice looks at what real-world governments do in practice.

  • In macroeconomics, for example, it is believed that monetary and fiscal policy can be used to reduce or eliminate economic downturns, and control inflation.

    • So the economy can be controlled by tax cuts, spending increases, etc.

  • But even if the optimal policy were known, policymakers may not have the incentive to implement it.

    • Incentives to work on the economy now to be reelected, but not work on it long-term.

Individual interests and the public interest

  • There is no public interest beyond the individual interests of the individuals who make up the public.

  • Thinking about some concept of the public interest can often be misleading

    • it is a rare public policy that benefits every single individual,

    • so the concept itself implies that the benefits to some more than offset the costs imposed on others.

    • It would be better to recognize interests on both sides rather than imply there's some greater public benefit.

  • Production is often organized through government to use the collective ability of gov to satisfy individual wants.

  • Justifications for gov collective action should not be confused with public interest.

Three areas of inquiry

  • Study of public choice is divided into three areas of inquiry

    • Voter preferences are aggregated under democratic decision-making.

    • The political process produces public policies, following the rules under which government operates.

    • The way that the rules under which government operates are designed (constitutional constraints).

Aggregating voter preferences

  • Voters are demanders of public policy and government output, and go to the ballot box to express their preferences.

    • The choices voters face are more aggregated and the output is less certain.

  • Ex., choosing a whole shopping cart instead of

    • There may be items you do not want.

    • There may be items you can't see.

    • There are other limits, like compromises or constitution.

  • The big is how the demands of individual voters are aggregated to produce a collective demand for public policies.

Designing public policy

  • Demanders of public policy

    • Voters.

    • Other interest groups also hire lobbyists to appeal directly to elected officials.

    • People within the government.

  • If we think of supply and demand in public policies

    • Demand: nobody will get exactly what they want

    • Supply: compromises must be made to pass legislation

  • Information and incentives

    • Academics can debate about optimal public policies, but in reality they don't have enough information to know which policies are optimal.

    • And, even if they did have enough information, they may not have the incentive to implement optimal policies.

  • The public choice approach looks at the way that policies are actually created and implemented,

    • which is not necessarily the way most people would like for them to be designed and implemented

Constitutional design

  • Public policies are designed within a framework of constitutional rules.

    • Some are written in an actual constitution, some are determined by courts, and some are long-standing and generally accepted ways of doing things.

  • Constitutional analysis examines the way groups collectively choose their institutional constraints.

Summary

  • Public choice analysis emphasizes the information available to decision-makers and the incentives they face.

  • It examines the way that the individual decisions people make within the political process are aggregated to produce public policies for the group.

  • While it is possible to analyze political decision-making as people would ideally like to see it,

    • public choice looks at the way that it actually does take place,

    • given the information that voters, elected officials, and government bureaucrats have, and the incentives they face.