A Preservice Teacher's Learning of Instructional Scaffolding in the EAL Practicum – Minh Hue Nguyen & Cara Penry Williams
Abstract
Qualitative case study of a preservice EAL teacher's learning during a two-week practicum.
Examines scaffolding in EAL, using interviews, reflections, and lesson recordings.
Framework based on sociocultural perspectives and the van de Pol et al. (2010) scaffolding model.
Findings show various scaffolding strategies were implemented, shaped by theoretical knowledge and belief in the importance of scaffolding.
Learning in practice was crucial for understanding students' abilities and challenges.
Instructional scaffolding must be emphasized in teacher education.
Introduction
Growing EAL Population
Increasing diversity among EAL students in Australian schools.
Victoria's EAL student statistics: 28% from LBOTE backgrounds (159,863 students).
Challenges for EAL learners include limited previous education and linguistic differences.
Effective support is necessary for EAL students to engage with mainstream curriculum.
Theoretical Framework
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory on individual learning through interaction;
Importance of teacher scaffolding for enhancing language learning and understanding.
Scaffolding defined in two forms: macro (planning) and micro (real-time interaction).
Focus on how preservice teachers can practice these strategies in actual classrooms.
Methodology
Research Design
Qualitative case study approach focusing on preservice teacher 'Frank' during EAL practicum.
Empirical inquiry to understand instructional scaffolding within real-life context.
Participant and Setting
Frank: Singaporean preservice teacher with experience in education and business.
Redwood Secondary College is a multicultural school with many EAL students.
Frank’s praction contains key EAL practices like creative, argumentative writings.
Data Collection and Analysis
Data from interviews, lesson reflections, and recorded lessons for triangulation.
Qualitative content analysis applied for a holistic examination and theme classification.
Findings and Discussion
Scaffolding Practices
Vocabulary Development: Integration of vocabulary book into EAL content.
Students write down unfamiliar words, their meanings and sentences as practice.
Utilization of strategies: Cognitive structuring, frustration control, and modeling.
Establishing peer-support rules to enhance reading confidence without ridicule.
Teacher Cognition
Understanding of student characteristics and contextual needs shaped Frank’s scaffolding.
The importance of theoretical knowledge from coursework and practical application observed in the classroom.
Effective scaffolding requires adapting strategies to current student needs; students' socio-economic backgrounds were considered.
Conclusions and Implications
The complexity of instructional scaffolding beyond mechanical teaching, focusing on learners’ needs and theoretical understanding.
Teacher education must integrate theory and practical experience effectively to prepare preservice teachers.
The value of mentoring in enhancing preservice teachers' skills during practical experiences.