EQ: How do ideologies of the two major parties shape policy debates?
Functions of Political Parties
Recruit Candidates and Run Campaigns
Parties nominate candidates for election.
Give Cues to Voters
Parties provide information to voters that influences their decisions based on party image.
Articulate Policies
Parties express their positions on various issues through platforms.
Example: Views on abortion and the death penalty.
Coordinate Policymaking
Congress operates based on party affiliation, affecting legislative organization.
Political Party Agenda
Platform
A series of statements that outline a party's principles, beliefs, and positions on issues.
Example of issues: Abortion, Death Penalty.
Plank
Each individual part of the party platform.
Example: Democratic support of abortion; Republican support of the death penalty.
Purpose: Communicate party goals to voters, although rarely read by the public today.
Political Platforms
Definition: A statement of a political party's goals and policies for the upcoming four years; the best formal expression of party beliefs.
Notable Political Parties:
Green Party
Libertarian Party
Reform Party
Communist Party
Constitution Party
US Pacifist Party
US Natural Law Party
America First
Prohibition Party
The Two-Party System
The U.S. Constitution does not specifically outline a party system in the U.S.; it developed through tradition and manipulation of the existing political framework.
Reasons for Two-Party System:
Winner-Take-All Elections/First Past the Post
Most electoral votes go to the candidate with the most votes in a state. Third parties do not gain electoral votes even if they receive significant votes.
Alternative Party Systems
Multiparty System
No single party can achieve full government control.
Common in countries like Germany and Israel.
One-Party System
The party and government are integrated.
Example: People's Republic of China (Communist Party)
Third Parties
Definition: Smaller, minor parties that seek to influence political discussions.
Influence: Often bring attention to issues that mainstream parties ignore; while they have not won the presidency, their ideas have sometimes been adopted by Democrats or Republicans.
Types of Third Parties
Single Issue Parties
Formed to advocate for specific issues. Example: Prohibitionist Party (1872).
Ideological Parties
Focused on specific philosophical ideals.
Examples:
Socialist Labor Party and Communist Party USA: Advocate for the replacement of free enterprise with government ownership of businesses.
Libertarian Party: Aims to reduce the size of the federal government and increase personal freedoms.
Independent Candidates
Led by strong personalities, often short-lived.
Examples: H. Ross Perot (1992, 1996), Ralph Nader (2000).
Obstacles for Third Parties
Debate Participation
Since 1992, third-party candidates are excluded from presidential debates.
Federal Financing
Third parties require at least 5% of the popular vote to qualify for federal funding.
Parties receiving 5-25% receive funding proportionate to their vote count.
Social Stigma
There exists a societal bias against voting for third-party candidates.
Ballot Access
Each state has unique requirements for ballot access, often involving numerous signatures and financial costs.
Leading Third-Party Presidential Candidates (1948-2004)
Election Year - Candidate - Political Party - Votes (in thousands)
1948 - Strom Thurmond - States' Rights - 1,176
1952 - Vincent Hallinan - Progressive - 104
1956 - T. Coleman Andrews - States' Rights - 111
1960 - Eric Hass - Socialist Labor - 48
1964 - Eric Hass - Socialist Labor - 45
1968 - George Wallace - American Independent - 9,906
1972 - John Schmitz - American - 1,099
1976 - Eugene McCarthy - Independent - 757
1980 - John Anderson - Independent - 5,720
1984 - David Bergland - Libertarian - 228
1988 - Ron Paul - Libertarian - 432
1992 - H. Ross Perot - Independent - 19,742
1996 - H. Ross Perot - Reform - 8,085
2000 - Ralph Nader - Green - 2,883
2004 - Ralph Nader - Independent - 464
Beginnings of the Two-Party System
Emergence from Washington's presidency:
Democratic-Republicans (Jefferson): Limited federal government, strict Constitution interpretation, pro-French Revolution, identified with common people, especially farmers.
Federalists (Hamilton): Strong central government, loose Constitution interpretation, pro-British, elite governance, believed business/industry was America's backbone.
Liberals: Less military spending, less willingness to commit troops.
Conservatives: Favor military intervention and maintaining peace through strength.
Social Policy:
Liberals: Support freedom of choice on issues like abortion.
Conservatives: Favor right-to-life positions.
Economic Policy:
Liberals: Advocate for government regulation for public interest, higher taxes on the wealthy, and increased spending for social services.
Conservatives: Favor free-market solutions, low taxes, and spending control.
Ideology and its Historical Context
Liberalism
Classical Liberalism:
Limited government, sees government as a threat to liberty.
Modern Liberalism:
Expanded government role to address corporate greed and provide protection for the less fortunate.
Historical Fluctuations: Shifted from a strong presence (1930s-1970s) to a backlash (1980s-1990s) leading to Neo-liberalism.
Neo-Liberals
Advocacy for less government dependency while still recognizing a role for government to solve problems (ex. welfare reform).
Modern Liberal Shifts
Rising movements like Occupy and BLM have shifted focus back towards government interventions.
Struggles with messaging and direction within the party.
Conservatism
Perceived as a reactionary force against the excesses of liberalism since the late 1970s.
Emphasizes reducing government involvement.
Neoconservatives and Religious Right: Focus on traditional social values and aggressive foreign policy stances.
Socialism vs. Libertarianism
Socialism: Advocates for government control over industries; less popular in the U.S. with fears of dependency.
Libertarianism: Seeks to minimize government involvement in personal and economic matters; advocates for personal freedoms and national defense limited to essential protective measures.
Conclusion - Political Parties Today
Increased polarization in American society.
Growing number of people identify as independents rather than aligning with major parties.
The urban-rural split highlights deepening divisions across the political landscape.