prompt 7

More government money should be spent on free-time activities for young people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

view 1: Benefits for young people

view 2: Long-term benefits for society

opinion 

  • Improves physical & mental health

  • Reduces screen addiction

  • Builds social skills (teamwork, communication)

  • Prevents negative behavior (crime, substance abuse)

  • Helps young people discover talents

  • Develops useful skills for future jobs

  • Considered an investment in human capital

  • Government budgets are limited

  • Other sectors (healthcare, education, infrastructure) are essential

  • Funding should be selective and efficient

It is believed that the governments should allocate more funding to leisure activities for young people, as such investment can produce significant social and long-term economics benefits. However, this spending should be carefully balanced with other essential public needs.

On the one hand, investing in leisure and recreational activities can contribute significantly to the youth physical and mental development. Access to social clubs, sports facilities and art centers incentivize young people adopt healthy lifestyles, reduce stress, and develop teamwork and social skills. This is particularly important in modern society where many adolescents spend excessive time on screens, leading to certain health problems as well as social isolation. Moreover, structured free-time programs can help prevent negative behaviors such as crime or substance abuse by keeping young people engaged in meaningful activities.

In addition, investing in young people’s recreational activities can also benefit the society as a whole. Programs related to music, technology and volunteering may help adolescents discover their talents which further translate into valuable skills for the workforce. From this perspective, government spending in this area should not be perceived as a cost, but a long-term investment for the human capital and the social stability.

However, it must be acknowledged that public resources are limited and that excessive spending on leisure programs may come at the expense of essential sectors such as education, healthcare, or infrastructure. Therefore, government should avoid overspending and instead prioritize high-quality, inclusive programs that genuinely benefit a large number of young people.

In conclusion, I firmly agree that public money should be allocated to leisure activities as it is essential for talents discovery and social stability, but this investment should be well-managed and balanced with other priorities.