Introduction to Electromagnetic Theory Study Guide

Fundamental Concepts of Electromagnetic Fields

  • Electric Field vs. Magnetic Field:

    • An Electric Field (E\mathbf{E}) is generated by static or moving electric charges and exerts forces on both stationary and moving charges.

    • A Magnetic Field (B\mathbf{B}) is generated by moving charges (electric currents) or permanent magnets and exerts forces exclusively on moving charges and magnetic materials.

  • Comparison Between Electric and Magnetic Fields:

Property

Electric Field (E\mathbf{E})

Magnetic Field (B\mathbf{B})

Source / Origin

Produced by electric charges

Produced by magnets and moving charges (currents)

Action / Target

Acts on both stationary and moving charges

Acts only on moving charges and magnetic materials

Symbol

E\mathbf{E}

B\mathbf{B}

SI Unit

N/C\text{N/C} or V/m\text{V/m}

Tesla (T\text{T})

Field Line Direction

From positive charge to negative charge

From North pole to South pole (outside a magnet)

Force Equation

\mathbf{F} = q \n\mathbf{E}

F=qvBsin(θ)F = q v B \sin(\theta) or F=q(v×B)\mathbf{F} = q (\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B})

  • Electromagnetic Waves:

    • Electromagnetic waves consist of time-varying electric field vectors (E\mathbf{E}) and magnetic field vectors (B\mathbf{B}) oscillating in mutually perpendicular planes, propagating perpendicular to both fields.

    • In a plane EM wave traveling along the xx-axis, if the electric field oscillates along the yy-axis, the magnetic field oscillates along the zz-axis.


Transverse Electromagnetic Wave Propagation
  • The Electromagnetic Spectrum:

    • Electromagnetic waves span a continuous spectrum of wavelengths (λ\lambda) and frequencies:

    • Gamma rays: 1013cm\approx 10^{-13}\,\text{cm}

    • X-rays: 109cm\approx 10^{-9}\,\text{cm}

    • Ultraviolet: 106cm\approx 10^{-6}\,\text{cm}

    • Visible light: 104cm\approx 10^{-4}\,\text{cm}

    • Infrared: 102cm\approx 10^{-2}\,\text{cm}

    • Microwaves: 1cm\approx 1\,\text{cm}

    • Radio waves: 1km\approx 1\,\text{km}


The Electromagnetic Spectrum
  • Magnetic Flux:

    • Magnetic flux (ΦB\Phi_B) quantifies the total magnetic field passing through a given surface area AA.

    • Formula: ΦB=BAcos(θ)\Phi_B = B A \cos(\theta)

    • Where BB is the magnetic field magnitude in Tesla (T\text{T}), AA is the surface area in square meters (m2\text{m}^2), and θ\theta is the angle between the magnetic field vector B\mathbf{B} and the surface normal.

Faraday's Laws of Electromagnetic Induction & Lenz's Law

  • Electromagnetic Induction:

    • Electromagnetic induction is the phenomenon where an electromotive force (EMF) or current is generated in a conductor by a changing magnetic flux.

  • Faraday's First Law:

    • Whenever the magnetic flux linked with a closed coil or circuit changes over time, an electromotive force (EMF) is induced in it.

    • This induced EMF persists only as long as the change in magnetic flux continues.

  • Faraday's Second Law:

    • The magnitude of the induced EMF (ε\varepsilon) is directly proportional to the time rate of change of magnetic flux linkage through the circuit.

    • Equation: ε=NdΦBdt\varepsilon = -N \frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}

    • Where NN represents the total number of turns in the coil, and dΦBdt\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt} represents the rate of change of magnetic flux.

  • Lenz's Law:

    • Statement: The direction of the induced EMF (and the resulting induced current) is always such that it opposes the change in magnetic flux that produces it.

    • The negative sign in Faraday's law formula reflects Lenz's law.

    • Physical Mechanism:

    • As a North magnetic pole approaches a coil, the magnetic flux through the coil increases. According to Lenz's law, the induced current flows in a direction that generates a North pole on the near face of the coil to repel the approaching magnet.

    • As the North pole moves away, flux decreases; the coil induces current in the opposite direction to form a South pole on the near face, attracting the receding magnet.

    • Energy Conservation Basis: Lenz's law is a direct consequence of the principle of conservation of energy. Mechanical work must be expended against the repulsive or attractive magnetic forces to maintain flux variation, which is converted into electrical energy.


Faraday Law and Lenz Law Demonstration
  • Parameters Controlling Induced Current:

    • Direction reversal occurs if:

    1. The motion of the magnet is reversed.

    2. The opposite magnetic pole (South instead of North) enters the coil first.

    • Magnitude increases by:

    1. Increasing the relative velocity/speed between magnet and coil.

    2. Increasing the magnetic field strength of the magnet.

    3. Increasing the number of turns (NN) on the coil.

  • Fleming's Right-Hand Rule:

    • Purpose: Determines the direction of induced current when a conductor moves across a magnetic field.

    • Statement: Stretch the thumb, forefinger (index finger), and middle finger of the right hand so that they are mutually perpendicular to each other:

    • Thumb: Points in the direction of the Motion of the conductor.

    • Forefinger (Index finger): Points in the direction of the Magnetic Field (from North to South).

    • Middle finger: Points in the direction of the Induced Current (or induced EMF).

S

Fleming Right Hand Rule

Electrodynamics Before Maxwell

  • Historical Pre-Maxwell Equations:

    • Before James Clerk Maxwell's modifications, classical electrodynamics was summarized by four distinct experimental laws in electrostatic and magnetostatic regimes.

  • Comparative Unit Formulations (SI vs. Gaussian/CGS):

Law

SI Unit Form

Gaussian (CGS) Unit Form

Electrostatic Gauss's Law

E=ρϵ0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}

E=4πρ\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4\pi\rho

Magnetostatic Gauss's Law

B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0

B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0

Faraday's Law of Induction

×E=Bt\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}

×E=1cBt\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}

Ampère's Circuital Law (Unmodified)

×B=μ0J\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}

×B=4πcJ\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \frac{4\pi}{c}\mathbf{J}

  • Detailed Derivation of Equation 1: Electrostatic Gauss's Law:

    • Integral Form: The net electric flux through any closed surface SS equals the enclosed electric charge divided by ϵ0\epsilon_0: ΦE=SEdA=qenclosedϵ0\Phi_E = \oint_S \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A} = \frac{q_{\text{enclosed}}}{\epsilon_0}

    • Expressing enclosed charge in terms of volume charge density ρ\rho: qenclosedϵ0=Vρϵ0dV\frac{q_{\text{enclosed}}}{\epsilon_0} = \int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}\,dV

    • Applying Gauss's Divergence Theorem to the surface integral of E\mathbf{E}: SEdA=V(E)dV\oint_S \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{A} = \int_V (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})\,dV

    • Equating the volume integrals: V(E)dV=Vρϵ0dV\int_V (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})\,dV = \int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}\,dV

    • Since this relation holds for any arbitrary volume VV, the integrands must be equal, yielding the Differential Form: E=ρϵ0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}


Electrostatic Gauss Law Surface
  • Detailed Derivation of Equation 2: Magnetostatic Gauss's Law:

    • Integral Form: The net magnetic flux through any closed surface SS is identically zero: SBdS=0\oint_S \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{S} = 0

    • Applying Gauss's Divergence Theorem: V(B)dV=SBdS=0\int_V (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B})\,dV = \oint_S \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{S} = 0

    • Because the volume VV is arbitrary, the Differential Form is: B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0

    • Physical Significance:

    • Magnetic field lines do not start or terminate on isolated sources; they form continuous closed loops.

    • The magnetic field vector B\mathbf{B} is a solenoidal vector field.

    • Isolated magnetic monopoles (free magnetic charges) do not exist in nature, unlike free electric charges (+q+q and q-q) in electrostatics.


Electric Dipole vs Magnetic Bar Magnet Field Lines
  • Detailed Derivation of Equation 3: Faraday's Law of Induction:

    • Induced EMF around a closed loop CC is the line integral of the electric field E\mathbf{E}: EMF=CEdl=ddt[SBn^dA]\text{EMF} = \oint_C \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = -\frac{d}{dt} \left[ \int_S \mathbf{B} \cdot \hat{n}\,dA \right]

    • Applying Stokes' Theorem to transform the closed line integral into a surface integral: CEdl=S(×E)n^dA\oint_C \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \int_S (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) \cdot \hat{n}\,dA

    • Equating the two surface integrals: S(×E)n^dA=S(Bt)n^dA\int_S (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) \cdot \hat{n}\,dA = \int_S \left(-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\right) \cdot \hat{n}\,dA

    • Since this equality holds for any surface SS, the Differential Form is: ×E=Bt\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}

  • Detailed Derivation of Equation 4: Original Ampère's Circuital Law:

    • Integral Form: The line integral of magnetic field B\mathbf{B} along a closed path CC equals μ0\mu_0 times the total enclosed current IenclosedI_{\text{enclosed}}: CBdl=μ0Ienclosed\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I_{\text{enclosed}}

    • Expressing current in terms of volume current density J\mathbf{J} over surface SS: Ienclosed=SJdSI_{\text{enclosed}} = \int_S \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{S}

    • Applying Stokes' Theorem to the left side: CBdl=S(×B)dS\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \int_S (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \cdot d\mathbf{S}

    • Equating integrals gives: S(×B)dS=μ0SJdS\int_S (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \cdot d\mathbf{S} = \mu_0 \int_S \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{S}

    • Differential Form (Original Ampère's Law): ×B=μ0J\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}

  • Mathematical Inconsistency of Original Ampère's Law:

    • Taking the vector divergence of both sides of Faraday's Law: (×E)=(Bt)=t(B)\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) = \nabla \cdot \left(-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\right) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B})

    • Since the divergence of any curl vector is mathematically zero ((×A)0\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{A}) \equiv 0) and B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0, both sides equal zero (0=00 = 0), confirming mathematical consistency.

    • Taking the vector divergence of both sides of original Ampère's Law: (×B)=μ0(J)\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) = \mu_0 (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J})

    • Since (×B)=0\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) = 0, this requires: μ0(J)=0    J=0\mu_0 (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}) = 0 \implies \nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0

    • While J=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0 holds true for steady, direct currents (magnetostatics), it fails for time-varying currents and non-steady fields where charge density changes in time.

    • Consequently, original Ampère's law is incomplete and incorrect beyond steady-state magnetostatics.

Volume Current Density and the Continuity Equation

  • Volume Current Density (J\mathbf{J}):

    • When electric charge flows through a three-dimensional region, current distribution is described by the volume current density vector J\mathbf{J}.

    • Definition: Consider a tube of infinitesimal cross-sectional area dada_\perp aligned parallel to charge flow carrying current dIdI: JdIda\mathbf{J} \equiv \frac{dI}{da_\perp}

    • Physical Meaning: J\mathbf{J} represents the electric current passing per unit cross-sectional area perpendicular to the flow.

    • Total Current Equation: The net current II crossing a macroscopic surface SS is: I=SJda=SJdaI = \int_S J\,da_\perp = \int_S \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{a}

    • Microscopic Charge Relation: If ρ\rho is the mobile volume charge density and v\mathbf{v} is charge velocity: J=ρv\mathbf{J} = \rho \mathbf{v}


Volume Current Density Tube
  • Derivation of the Continuity Equation (Local Charge Conservation):

    • The total electric charge leaving a volume VV bounded by surface SS per unit time is: SJda=Sρvda\oint_S \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{a} = \oint_S \rho \mathbf{v} \cdot d\mathbf{a}

    • By the principle of conservation of charge, charge cannot be created or destroyed. Any outward flow of charge through surface SS must decrease the total remaining charge inside volume VV: SJda=ddt[Vρdτ]=V(ρt)dτ\oint_S \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{a} = -\frac{d}{dt} \left[ \int_V \rho\,d\tau \right] = -\int_V \left(\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right)\,d\tau

    • Applying Gauss's Divergence Theorem to the surface integral of J\mathbf{J}: SJda=V(J)dτ\oint_S \mathbf{J} \cdot d\mathbf{a} = \int_V (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J})\,d\tau

    • Equating both volume integrals: V(J)dτ=V(ρt)dτ\int_V (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J})\,d\tau = -\int_V \left(\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right)\,d\tau

    • Since this relation holds for any arbitrary volume VV, the integrands must be identical: J=ρt\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = -\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}

    • Rearranging yields the standard Continuity Equation: J+ρt=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = 0

    • Statement: The continuity equation is the precise mathematical statement of local charge conservation.

Maxwell's Modification of Ampère's Law & Displacement Current

  • The Capacitor Paradox:

    • Consider a circuit containing a battery charging a parallel-plate capacitor with conduction current II flowing in the connecting wires.

    • Apply original Ampère's Law CBdl=μ0Ienclosed\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I_{\text{enclosed}} to an Amperian loop CC enclosing the wire:

    1. Flat Surface Option: If a flat disk surface bounded by loop CC is selected, the wire penetrates the surface carrying current II. Thus Ienclosed=II_{\text{enclosed}} = I, and CBdl=μ0I\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I.

    2. Balloon Surface Option: If a balloon-shaped surface bulging between the capacitor plates is selected, no conduction wire crosses this surface (Ienclosed=0I_{\text{enclosed}} = 0). Thus CBdl=0\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = 0

    • Contradiction: Two different surfaces sharing the exact same boundary curve CC give conflicting magnetic field predictions. Ampère's law fails in the gap between capacitor plates.


Capacitor Amperian Loop Inconsistency
  • Maxwell's Resolution & Derivation of Displacement Current:

    • The uniform electric field EE between parallel capacitor plates with charge QQ and surface area AA is: E=σϵ0=Qϵ0AE = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0 A}

    • Differentiating with respect to time tt: Et=1ϵ0AdQdt=Iϵ0A\frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0 A} \frac{dQ}{dt} = \frac{I}{\epsilon_0 A}

    • Expressing conduction current II in terms of rate of change of electric field: I=ϵ0AEt=ϵ0S(Et)daI = \epsilon_0 A \frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = \epsilon_0 \int_S \left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right) \cdot d\mathbf{a}

    • Maxwell defined this time-varying electric field term as the Displacement Current (IDI_D): IDϵ0ΦEt=ϵ0S(Et)daI_D \equiv \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \Phi_E}{\partial t} = \epsilon_0 \int_S \left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right) \cdot d\mathbf{a}

    • Definition of Displacement Current Density (JD\mathbf{J}_D): JD=ϵ0Et=Dt\mathbf{J}_D = \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t}

    • Where D=ϵ0E\mathbf{D} = \epsilon_0 \mathbf{E} is the electric displacement field.

  • Modified Ampère's Law (Ampère-Maxwell Law):

    • Maxwell added displacement current to conduction current, defining total current Itotal=IC+IDI_{\text{total}} = I_C + I_D

    • Integral Form: CBdl=μ0Ienclosed+μ0ϵ0S(Et)da\oint_C \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I_{\text{enclosed}} + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \int_S \left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right) \cdot d\mathbf{a}

    • Differential Form: ×B=μ0JC+μ0ϵ0Et\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}_C + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}

  • Proof of Consistency with Charge Conservation:

    • Taking divergence of both sides of the Ampère-Maxwell Law: (×B)=μ0(JC)+μ0ϵ0(Et)\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) = \mu_0 (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}_C) + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right)

    • Substituting (×B)=0\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) = 0: 0=μ0(JC)+μ0ϵ0t(E)0 = \mu_0 (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}_C) + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})

    • Substitute Electrostatic Gauss's Law (E=ρϵ0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}): μ0(JC)+μ0ϵ0t(ρϵ0)=0\mu_0 (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}_C) + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}\right) = 0 μ0(JC+ρt)=0    JC+ρt=0\mu_0 \left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}_C + \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = 0 \implies \nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}_C + \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = 0

    • The modified law perfectly recovers the continuity equation, resolving the mathematical contradiction.

  • Comparison: Conduction Current vs. Displacement Current:

Property

Conduction Current (ICI_C / JC\mathbf{J}_C)

Displacement Current (IDI_D / JD\mathbf{J}_D)

Origin / Source

Produced by actual movement of free charge carriers

Produced by a time-varying electric field

Medium

Exists only in conducting materials

Exists in dielectrics, insulators, and vacuum

Free Carriers

Requires free charge carriers (electrons, ions)

Does not require free charge carriers

Thermal Heating

Causes Joule heating (I2RI^2 R)

Does not cause Joule heating

Governing Formula

Obeys Ohm's law: JC=σE\mathbf{J}_C = \sigma \mathbf{E}

Defined as: JD=Dt=ϵ0Et\mathbf{J}_D = \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t} = \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}

Electron Transport

Continuous flow of physical electrons

No actual electron movement through dielectric

Circuit Type

Present in both DC and AC circuits

Significant primarily in AC or time-varying fields

Magnetic Field

Produces a magnetic field around conductor

Produces a magnetic field between plates/space

Complete Formulation and Properties of Maxwell's Equations

  • Complete Set of Maxwell's Equations:

  • In SI Units:

    1. Gauss's Law for Electrostatics: E=ρϵ0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}

    2. Gauss's Law for Magnetostatics: B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0

    3. Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction: ×E=Bt\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}

    4. Ampère-Maxwell Law: ×B=μ0J+μ0ϵ0Et\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}

  • In Gaussian (CGS) Units:

    1. E=4πρ\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4\pi\rho

    2. B=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0

    3. ×E=1cBt\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}

    4. ×B=4πcJ+1cEt\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \frac{4\pi}{c}\mathbf{J} + \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}

  • Lorentz Force Law Integration:

    • Maxwell's equations together with the Lorentz force equation summarize the entire classical electrodynamics theory: F=q(E+v×B)\mathbf{F} = q \left( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} \right)

  • Core Properties of Maxwell's Equations:

    1. Linearity: Maxwell's equations are linear differential equations. This property underpins the principle of superposition: if two electric/magnetic fields satisfy Maxwell's equations, their vector sum also satisfies them.

    2. Implicit Charge Conservation: Divergence of the 4th equation automatically yields the continuity equation J+ρt=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = 0, enforcing global and local charge conservation.

    3. Field Mutual Interconversion:

    • A time-varying magnetic field generates a space-varying electric field (×E=Bt\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}).

    • A time-varying electric field generates a space-varying magnetic field (×B=μ0ϵ0Et\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}).

    • This continuous interconversion allows self-sustaining electromagnetic wave propagation through space without physical media.

Electromagnetic Wave Equation in Free Space

  • Maxwell's Equations in Free Space (Vacuum):

    • In vacuum, there are no free electric charges (ρ=0\rho = 0) and no electric conduction currents (J=0\mathbf{J} = 0).

    • Expressing fields in terms of E\mathbf{E} and H\mathbf{H} (where B=μ0H\mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{H} and D=ϵ0E\mathbf{D} = \epsilon_0 \mathbf{E}): E=0— (1)\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 \quad \text{--- (1)} H=0— (2)\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H} = 0 \quad \text{--- (2)} ×E=μ0Ht— (3)\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mu_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{H}}{\partial t} \quad \text{--- (3)} ×H=ϵ0Et— (4)\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} \quad \text{--- (4)}

  • Derivation of Wave Equation for Electric Field (E\mathbf{E}):

    • Take curl of equation (3): ×(×E)=×(μ0Ht)\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) = \nabla \times \left(-\mu_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{H}}{\partial t}\right)

    • Apply vector identity ×(×E)=(E)2E\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E}) = \nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}) - \nabla^2 \mathbf{E}: (E)2E=μ0t(×H)\nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}) - \nabla^2 \mathbf{E} = -\mu_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla \times \mathbf{H})

    • Substitute E=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 from (1) and ×H=ϵ0Et\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} from (4): 2E=μ0t(ϵ0Et)-\nabla^2 \mathbf{E} = -\mu_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right) 2E=μ0ϵ02Et2\nabla^2 \mathbf{E} = \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2}

    • Rearranging gives the 3D Wave Equation for E\mathbf{E}: 2Eμ0ϵ02Et2=0\nabla^2 \mathbf{E} - \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = 0

  • Derivation of Wave Equation for Magnetic Field (H\mathbf{H}):

    • Take curl of equation (4): ×(×H)=×(ϵ0Et)\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{H}) = \nabla \times \left(\epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\right)

    • Apply vector identity ×(×H)=(H)2H\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{H}) = \nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H}) - \nabla^2 \mathbf{H}: (H)2H=ϵ0t(×E)\nabla(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H}) - \nabla^2 \mathbf{H} = \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla \times \mathbf{E})

    • Substitute H=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H} = 0 from (2) and ×E=μ0Ht\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mu_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{H}}{\partial t} from (3): 2H=ϵ0t(μ0Ht)-\nabla^2 \mathbf{H} = \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(-\mu_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{H}}{\partial t}\right) 2H=μ0ϵ02Ht2\nabla^2 \mathbf{H} = \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{H}}{\partial t^2}

    • Rearranging gives the 3D Wave Equation for H\mathbf{H}: 2Hμ0ϵ02Ht2=0\nabla^2 \mathbf{H} - \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{H}}{\partial t^2} = 0

  • Velocity of Propagation & Speed of Light:

    • Standard 3D wave equation for a scalar wave function ff: 2f=1v22ft2\nabla^2 f = \frac{1}{v^2} \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial t^2}

    • Comparing 2E=μ0ϵ02Et2\nabla^2 \mathbf{E} = \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} with standard form: 1v2=μ0ϵ0    v=1μ0ϵ0\frac{1}{v^2} = \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \implies v = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}}

    • Substituting fundamental physical constants:

    • Permeability of free space: μ0=4π×107N/A2\mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7}\,\text{N/A}^2

    • Permittivity of free space: ϵ08.854×1012F/m\epsilon_0 \approx 8.854 \times 10^{-12}\,\text{F/m} v=1μ0ϵ0=c=3×108m/sv = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}} = c = 3 \times 10^8\,\text{m/s}

    • Conclusion: Electromagnetic waves travel in free space at speed c=3×108m/sc = 3 \times 10^8\,\text{m/s}, establishing theoretical proof that light is an electromagnetic wave.

Transverse Nature of Electromagnetic Waves

  • Plane Wave Solutions:

    • Plane harmonic wave solutions propagating in direction of wave vector k\mathbf{k}: E=E0exp[i(krωt)]\mathbf{E} = \mathbf{E}_0 \exp\left[i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)\right] H=H0exp[i(krωt)]\mathbf{H} = \mathbf{H}_0 \exp\left[i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)\right]

    • Where E0\mathbf{E}_0 and H0\mathbf{H}_0 are constant complex amplitude vectors, k\mathbf{k} is the wave vector, r\mathbf{r} is position vector, and ω\omega is angular frequency.

  • Mathematical Proof of Transversality:

    • Substituting wave solutions into free-space Gauss's divergence equations (E=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 and H=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H} = 0): E=ikE=0    kE=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 \implies \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 H=ikH=0    kH=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{H} = i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{H} = 0 \implies \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{H} = 0

    • Significance: The zero dot products kE=0\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 and kH=0\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{H} = 0 mathematically prove that both electric field vector E\mathbf{E} and magnetic field vector H\mathbf{H} are perpendicular to propagation wave vector k\mathbf{k}.

    • Therefore, electromagnetic waves in free space are strictly transverse waves.