DIS LECTURE 3 NOTES
Reliability Analysis: Understanding Cronbach's Alpha
Introduction
Instituted By: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Social Sciences
Objective: Analyze the reliability of a measurement tool using Cronbach's Alpha.
What is a Good Alpha?
Dependence on Context: Definition of a good alpha varies among experts.
Rule of Thumb: Commonly, a good alpha is considered to be greater than 0.8.
Item Correlation and Number of Items:
Alpha is influenced by inter-item correlation.
More items generally lead to a higher alpha.
Thus, a value of 0.8 may be acceptable under certain conditions depending on these aspects.
Increasing Reliability
Criteria for Improvement
Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
Evaluate the alpha's value if a particular item is removed.
Use this comparison to establish whether removing helps in increasing reliability.
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
This measures the relationship between an individual item and the total score from other items.
Acceptable Standard: Should be greater than 0.5.
Squared Multiple Correlation
Computes the proportion of variance in an item explained by other items in the scale.
Acceptable Standard: Should be greater than 0.3.
Detailed Breakdown of Criteria
1. Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
Compare this value with the overall Cronbach’s Alpha (e.g., 0.866).
2. Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Assess how much an item correlates with the total score from the other items.
A value greater than 0.5 indicates strong correlation.
3. Squared Multiple Correlation (R²)
Represents the R² from a regression analysis where this item is treated as a dependent variable, with other items as predictors.
A threshold of 0.3 is deemed acceptable.
Decision Making for Item Removal
Guidelines for Removal
If an item fails to meet the criteria:
A low Corrected Item-Total Correlation (< 0.5) and/or
A low Squared Multiple Correlation (< 0.3)
Additionally, assess the impact on overall Cronbach's Alpha when considered for removal.
Importance of Theoretical Meaning: Consider if item removal makes sense based on the concept being measured.
Example Items for Assessment
Questions on emotional responses:
Losing patience
Being irritated by small things
Remaining angry
Feeling like shouting or taking revenge
Perceptions of unfairness or jealousy
Assess the distribution of responses for interpreting reliability and validity.
Final Notes
Interpretation Importance
Always contextualize and interpret statistical results meaningfully within the broader framework of the research objectives.