3
Tracking Teen Food Marketing
Authors and Affiliations
Charlene Elliott, Emily Truman, Jason Edward Black
Affiliations: University of Calgary, Communication, Media and Film; University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences
Keywords
Adolescence, Food Marketing, Monitoring, Policy, Teenager, Power
Abstract
Food marketing influences children's food preferences and consumption patterns.
Teenagers are recognized as a uniquely vulnerable audience for food marketing.
This study engages teenagers (ages 13–17) to capture food marketing targeting them using a mobile app called GrabFM!
Key Findings:
Digital platforms dominate teen-targeted food marketing (Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube).
Advertising primarily consists of branded beverages, fast food, and candy/chocolate (72%).
Persuasive techniques include visual style, special offers, and engaging themes.
1. Introduction
Recognition of the influence of food marketing on teenagers is increasing.
WHO (2018) notes teens are particularly susceptible due to developmental factors.
Current marketing pressures on teens for unhealthy foods are escalating.
There’s a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding marketing methods and their persuasive power toward teenagers.
2. Methods
Data Collection
Participants used the GrabFM! app to document food marketing.
Indicators for Teen-Targeting: Participants selected characteristics indicating the ad is aimed at them (visual style, themes, special offers, etc.).
2.1 Recruitment and Procedure
Participant Demographics: 682 teenagers recruited from various sources.
Participants captured food marketing examples for 7 days.
2.2 Data Cleaning
Exclusion of invalid submissions and classification of brands into categories.
2.3 Statistical Analysis
Analysis performed using R, with statistical significance set at <0.05.
3. Results
3.1 Advertising Collected
Sample: 367 teens, 309 valid entries, average of 6 ads per teen.
Key brands: Starbucks, Tim Hortons, McDonalds.
Top categories: Beverages, Fast Food, Candy/Chocolate (72% of ads).
3.2 Platforms of Exposure
Dominant platforms: 35% Instagram, 17% Snapchat, 13% TikTok.
Low representation from traditional platforms like TV and outdoor ads.
3.3 Platforms by Gender
Gender differences observed in platform use: Girls leaned toward Snapchat and TikTok, while gender non-conforming teens reported Twitch ads disproportionately.
3.4 Indicators of Food Marketing Power
Top Indicators: 1. Visual Style (52%), 2. Special Offers (29%), 3. Theme (26%).
Visual Style includes vibrant colors and appealing aesthetics.
3.5 Power Indicators by Brands
Noteworthy brands and their advertising techniques are highlighted.
3.6 Celebrity and Persuasive Power
Celebrity influence in ads was lower than other factors, but notable personalities were frequently tagged.
3.7 Age Variability in Persuasion
Older teenagers employed more complex reasoning in attribute tagging compared to younger teens.
4. Discussion
Summary of important findings related to platforms and techniques targeting teens.
Analyzed trends highlighted digital platforms' predominance in food marketing.
Marketing messages specifically resonate with characteristics identified by teens.
5. Strengths and Limitations
Strengths include engaging methodology and detailed perspectives from teens.
Limitations include the snapshot nature of the data and potential oversight in captured marketing examples.
6. Conclusion
The study reveals crucial insights into platforms, food products, and persuasive appeals targeting teenagers.
Knowledge gained can aid policymakers in developing effective monitoring strategies for teen-focused food marketing.