Leadership Power and Influence Study Notes
SCHOOL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP & BUSINESS INNOVATION
University: University of Guyana, Turkeyen Campus
Course Code: MNG 2101: Business Leadership
Lecturer: Mr. Bruce Lovell
Semester: 1
Email: jullian.lovell@uog.edu.gy
STUDENT NOTES – 7 LEADERSHIP POWER AND INFLUENCE
Lecture Outline
Four kinds of influential leaders.
Types of power and influencing tactics.
Increasing power through political activity.
Abuse of leadership power.
The dark side of leadership.
Spiritual values and leadership.
Lecture Objectives
Describe the four major styles of influential leadership.
Discuss similarities and differences among the seven types of power and the use of influencing tactics.
Describe the four leader frames of reference and political tactics for asserting leader influence.
Understand how leaders use power and politics ethically and responsibly.
Describe some common reasons why people fail in leadership positions.
Describe the principles of spiritual leadership and workplace spirituality.
FOUR KINDS OF INFLUENTIAL LEADERSHIP
Leadership is closely associated with power and influence, as a leader's power enables them to exercise influence.
Leadership power is often granted by an organization and derives from the leader's position, but leaders can also possess personal power that is independent of their job title.
Types of influential leadership include:
Transformational Leadership
Charismatic Leadership
Coalitional Leadership
Machiavellian-style Leadership
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Characteristics:
Transformational leaders drive significant change in followers and the organization.
They lead changes in vision, strategy, culture, and promote innovation.
Comparison with Transactional Leadership:
Transactional Leadership:
Involves an exchange process between leaders and followers.
Focuses on recognizing and rewarding followers' needs for fulfilling objectives.
Concentrates on management functions like planning and controlling.
Emphasizes stability over change.
Transformational Leadership:
Focuses on inspiration, vision, and shared values.
Encourages followers to transcend personal interests for the group's benefit.
Elevates concerns from basic physical needs to higher psychological needs, like self-esteem and self-actualization.
Aims to develop followers into leaders.
Learning Transformation Skills:
Skills for transformational leadership can be learned, while transactional skills are equally essential in a changing world.
CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP
Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders:
They have a profound emotional impact and inspire relentless effort in followers, often leading them to pursue group goals over personal sacrifices.
Example: Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group, chooses ventures based on passion, transferring enthusiasm to others.
Attributes of Charismatic Leaders:
Articulate a compelling vision that connects with followers.
Set high expectations and foster confidence.
Communicate complex ideas in understandable ways.
Display nonverbal communication effectively to convey emotions.
Source of influence derives from personal attributes rather than formal authority.
Comparison with Non-charismatic Leaders:
Non-charismatic Leaders: Maintain status quo, weak articulation, and rely on position authority.
Charismatic Leaders: Encourage change, articulate an idealized vision, and engage through personal power.
COALITIONAL LEADERSHIP
Focuses on a coalition of supporters rather than a single leader.
Involves understanding patterns of interaction and influence within the organization.
Skills of Coalitional Leaders:
Develop relationships and networks.
Talk with a broad range of stakeholders to understand perspectives.
Build coalitions among advocates, partners, resisters, and observers.
Facilitate cooperation across departments to achieve goals.
Example: Elon Musk’s approach at Tesla stressing anti-silo cooperation within departments.
MACHIAVELLIAN-STYLE LEADERSHIP
Machiavelli's Influence:
Niccolo Machiavelli emphasized using power for stability and objectives, encapsulated in "the ends justify the means."
Contrast to contemporary views where Machiavellianism reflects unscrupulous self-serving behavior.
Characteristics:
Always vigilant against challenges to their power.
Prefer being feared over being liked, understanding that mercy can lead to disorder.
Utilization of deception and manipulation, if necessary.
Employ rewards and punishments to shape follower behavior.
Differences with Coalitional Leaders: Machiavellian leaders focus on individual power compared to coalitional leaders who focus on collaboration.
TYPES OF POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTICS
Definition of Power:
The potential ability of one person to influence others to attain desired outcomes.
Differentiation between position power (hard power) and personal power (soft power).
Position Power (Hard Power):
Derived from formal authority in the organizational hierarchy.
Essential for managers to achieve objectives.
Personal Power (Soft Power):
Based on relationships and behaviors exhibited by leaders.
Individuals can influence others without formal management roles.
Sources and Types of Power with Influencing Tactics
Sources of Power:
Position Power/Hard Power:
Types:
Legitimate
Reward
Coercive
Personal Power/Soft Power:
Types:
Referent
Expert
Information
Connection
Influencing Tactics:
Legitimisation
Consultation
Rational Persuasion
Exchange
Pressure
Coalitions
Personal Appeal
Inspirational Appeal
Ingratiation
LEGITIMATE POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTICS
Definition:
Authority granted by an organization allowing managers to direct employees.
Influencing Tactics:
Legitimisation Tactics: Make requests based on position authority.
Consultation Tactics: Include others in decision-making to enhance feedback.
Rational Persuasion Tactics: Use logical arguments and evidence to influence behavior.
Steps for Rational Persuasion:
State the objective's necessity clearly.
Communicate personal benefits to followers.
Provide evidence supporting the objective's feasibility.
preemptively resolve potential concerns.
REWARD POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTIC
Definition:
The authority to provide rewards that are valued by followers.
Influencing Tactic:
Exchange Tactic: Leaders foster reciprocal favor exchanges.
To enhance reward power, managers should:
Control performance evaluations, salary, and promotion criteria.
Clarify the rules for earning rewards.
COERCIVE POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTIC
Definition:
Authority to punish or withhold rewards to ensure compliance.
Influencing Tactic:
Pressure Tactic: Involves threats in enforcement of compliance.
To strengthen coercive power, leaders must:
Have the authority to apply penalties.
Exercise coercive power carefully to avoid resentment.
Be persistent in follow-ups after requests.
EXPERT POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTIC
Definition:
Authority based on expertise and specialized knowledge.
Influencing Tactic:
Uses Rational Persuasion.
To increase expert power, leaders should:
Pursue ongoing education and stay updated on industry trends.
Leverage expertise through visibility and proof of competence.
REFERENT POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTICS
Definition:
Power derived from personal relationships and loyalty.
Influencing Tactics:
Personal Appeal Tactic: Encourage compliance through personal connection.
Inspirational Appeal Tactic: Generate positive emotional responses to initiatives.
Ingratiation Tactic: Build goodwill through praise and compliments before requests.
To enhance referent power, leaders should cultivate good relationships with peers and employees.
INFORMATION POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTICS
Definition:
Authority based on possessing relevant knowledge or data.
Influencing Tactics:
Employ Rational Persuasion or Inspirational Appeals to leverage information power.
To increase information power, maintain a flow of valuable insights within the organization.
CONNECTION POWER AND INFLUENCING TACTIC
Definition:
Power established through relationships with influential actors.
Influencing Tactic:
Employ Coalition Tactics for support.
To expand connection power, engage and network with key stakeholders.
FOLLOWER RESPONSES TO THE USE OF POWER
Follower reactions to power use can result in:
Compliance: Following directives without agreement, often resultant from positional power usage.
Resistance: Intentional avoidance of directives, often seen with coercive power being overexerted.
Commitment: A strong alignment with a leader's viewpoint fostered through personal power.
Effective leadership blends both position and personal power for optimal results.
INCREASING POWER THROUGH POLITICAL ACTIVITY
Organizational success often requires effective navigation of the political landscape within and outside the organization.
Politics encompasses the strategies employed to acquire and leverage power in response to uncertainties.
Leaders must build relationships as a means to achieve their goals, thereby recognizing organizational politics as critical to effective leadership.
POLITICAL TALENTS AND LEADERSHIP
Leaders engage in political activities to influence policies beneficial to their organizations.
Political behavior can positively or negatively impact organizations by allowing leaders to implement methods beyond formal policies.
LEADER FRAMES OF REFERENCE
A leader's worldview and frame of reference shape their interactions and decision-making approach.
Four Leader Frames of Reference:
Structural Frame: Emphasizes organization and efficiency, viewing the organization as a machine relying on authority.
Human Resource Frame: Focuses on interpersonal relations and empowerment, treating the organization as a clan or family.
Political Frame: Sees the organization as a source of tension and resource contestation, leveraging power through coalitions.
Symbolic Frame: Interpret the organization as a theater emphasizing culture and shared meaning to inspire commitment.
Leaders need to adapt and integrate perspectives for maximum effectiveness.
POLITICAL TACTICS FOR ASSERTING LEADERSHIP INFLUENCE
Successful leaders select the most effective approach when applying their power to influence others.
Six Principles for Asserting Influence:
Appeal to a Higher Vision
Rely on Rational Persuasion
Foster Likeability and Friendliness
Leverage Reciprocity
Build Alliances
Make Direct Appeals
ABUSE OF LEADERSHIP POWER
The misuse of power can lead to significant harm within an organization.
Approach to power utilization can be categorized as:
Personalized Leadership: Focus on self-serving motives.
Socialized Leadership: Aims to uplift organizational and community goals.
GUIDELINES FOR RESPONSIBLE USE OF POWER
Leaders should reflect on their motivations (self-interest vs. collective organizational goals) when making decisions.
Align actions with individual rights, fairness, and personal accountability in decision making to ensure the responsible use of power.
THE DARK SIDE OF LEADERSHIP
Poor leadership can stem from destructive practices, incompetence, and derailment.
Destructive Leadership: Effective in achieving results but often violates ethical principles.
Managerial Incompetence: Frequently arises from ill-prepared individuals in leadership roles.
Managerial Derailment: Common causes for failure in leadership roles include lack of adaptability, poor interpersonal skills, and situational misalignment.
SPIRITUAL VALUES AND LEADERSHIP
The infusion of spiritual values into leadership behaviors correlates with higher organizational success.
Spiritual Leadership: Encompasses values and behaviors that inspire meaningful work and enhanced commitment.
Spiritual Leadership Behaviors:
Creating an inspiring vision.
Establishing a culture of altruistic love and support.
Instilling hope and faith within the organization.
Workplace Spirituality: Provides a holistic environment that aligns individual values with organizational purpose, enhancing productivity, loyalty, and commitment.