Introduction to Psychology: Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Reasoning
Because of egocentricity, young children’s judgment of right and wrong is based on doing what is good for them
Stage 1: Punishment - Obedience
Rules are obeyed to avoid punishment
Actions are judged “good” or “bad” by their physical consequences
Limited sense of reciprocity
“You may scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.”
Stage 2: Personal - Reward
“Right” and “wrong” are determined by personal needs
Favors are paid back as in “you do something good for me and I’ll do something good for you.”
Those who never progress beyond this stage – choose to spend their lives engaged in organized crime
The child takes into view the perspective of others
Adherence to traditional values, law and order, loyalty to others, and society
Approval of one’s beliefs, actions, and laws are of paramount importance
Stage 3: Good-Person
“Good” is determined by what is approved of or by what pleases others
Being …:
Nice
Approved of
Pleasing others
Performing “appropriate behavior”
Fulfilling mutual expectation
Conforming
The golden rule is observed
Stage 4: Law-and-Order
Respecting authority
Doing one’s duty
Maintaining social order for its own sake
The concern enlarges to an awareness of societal, national, and religious values that extend beyond the immediate group of family and friends
Moral principles are defined independently of either authority or group identification
Stage 5: Social-Contract
While laws are necessary, they are relative rather than absolute
Laws are perceived to reflect a social consensus, or agreement, among people to maintain social standards and to protect individual rights
Laws may be changed democratically if they no longer meet society’s needs
The purpose of laws is to enable people to live in harmony and maintain a sense of community while not transcending such individual liberties
Laws serve people and must not interfere with higher-order rights (i.e. individual liberties)
Stage 6: Universal - Ethical - Principle
Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr.
Have a clear vision of abstract moral principles such as justice and fairness
They not only teach these principles to others but sacrifice their lives, if necessary, to stand up for them
Moral reasoning and behaving morally are not the same
Even though moral reasoning is associated with moral behavior, it does not guarantee that moral behavior will occur
There are other factors (inconvenience, personal risk, gender role orientation, perspective taking) that enter into moral decisions
There is an inevitable overlapping between stages
Occasional tendency to appear to move in a backward direction
The complexity of moral decision making based on the number of factors involved may lead to the kind of inconsistency and unpredictability for which a systematic theory of discrete stages has difficulty accounting
Universality and Generality of the Stages
Theory is biased in favor of Western cultures, and particularly among the highest social and educational levels of Western
In Eastern, more traditional cultures, the universal moral principles of postconventional moral reasoning often are based on the traditional and religious beliefs
Few people outside the Western part of the world would be classified as having reached the highest level of moral development
Neither adolescence nor young adulthood
Ages 18-25
Theoretically and empirically distinct from both
Distinguished by relative independence from social roles and from normative expectations
Having left the dependency of childhood and adolescence, and having not yet entered the enduring responsibilities that are normative in adulthood, emerging adults often explore a variety of possible life direction in love, work, and worldviews
A time of life when little about the future has been decided for certain, when the scope of independent expiration of life’s possibilities is greater for most people than it will be at any other period of the life course
How did this happen?
sweeping demographic shifts have taken place over the past half century that have made the late teens and early twenties not simply a brief period of transition into adult roles
Distinct period of the life course
Change and exploration of possible life decisions
How would someone with a sociocultural orientation react to these arguments?
Use the sociocultural perspective to critically examine the generalizability of “emerging adulthood” to other cultures
In economically developing countries, there tends to be a distinct cultural split between urban and rural areas
In developing countries emerging adulthood is often experienced in urban areas but rarely in rural areas
Because of egocentricity, young children’s judgment of right and wrong is based on doing what is good for them
Stage 1: Punishment - Obedience
Rules are obeyed to avoid punishment
Actions are judged “good” or “bad” by their physical consequences
Limited sense of reciprocity
“You may scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.”
Stage 2: Personal - Reward
“Right” and “wrong” are determined by personal needs
Favors are paid back as in “you do something good for me and I’ll do something good for you.”
Those who never progress beyond this stage – choose to spend their lives engaged in organized crime
The child takes into view the perspective of others
Adherence to traditional values, law and order, loyalty to others, and society
Approval of one’s beliefs, actions, and laws are of paramount importance
Stage 3: Good-Person
“Good” is determined by what is approved of or by what pleases others
Being …:
Nice
Approved of
Pleasing others
Performing “appropriate behavior”
Fulfilling mutual expectation
Conforming
The golden rule is observed
Stage 4: Law-and-Order
Respecting authority
Doing one’s duty
Maintaining social order for its own sake
The concern enlarges to an awareness of societal, national, and religious values that extend beyond the immediate group of family and friends
Moral principles are defined independently of either authority or group identification
Stage 5: Social-Contract
While laws are necessary, they are relative rather than absolute
Laws are perceived to reflect a social consensus, or agreement, among people to maintain social standards and to protect individual rights
Laws may be changed democratically if they no longer meet society’s needs
The purpose of laws is to enable people to live in harmony and maintain a sense of community while not transcending such individual liberties
Laws serve people and must not interfere with higher-order rights (i.e. individual liberties)
Stage 6: Universal - Ethical - Principle
Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr.
Have a clear vision of abstract moral principles such as justice and fairness
They not only teach these principles to others but sacrifice their lives, if necessary, to stand up for them
Moral reasoning and behaving morally are not the same
Even though moral reasoning is associated with moral behavior, it does not guarantee that moral behavior will occur
There are other factors (inconvenience, personal risk, gender role orientation, perspective taking) that enter into moral decisions
There is an inevitable overlapping between stages
Occasional tendency to appear to move in a backward direction
The complexity of moral decision making based on the number of factors involved may lead to the kind of inconsistency and unpredictability for which a systematic theory of discrete stages has difficulty accounting
Universality and Generality of the Stages
Theory is biased in favor of Western cultures, and particularly among the highest social and educational levels of Western
In Eastern, more traditional cultures, the universal moral principles of postconventional moral reasoning often are based on the traditional and religious beliefs
Few people outside the Western part of the world would be classified as having reached the highest level of moral development
Neither adolescence nor young adulthood
Ages 18-25
Theoretically and empirically distinct from both
Distinguished by relative independence from social roles and from normative expectations
Having left the dependency of childhood and adolescence, and having not yet entered the enduring responsibilities that are normative in adulthood, emerging adults often explore a variety of possible life direction in love, work, and worldviews
A time of life when little about the future has been decided for certain, when the scope of independent expiration of life’s possibilities is greater for most people than it will be at any other period of the life course
How did this happen?
sweeping demographic shifts have taken place over the past half century that have made the late teens and early twenties not simply a brief period of transition into adult roles
Distinct period of the life course
Change and exploration of possible life decisions
How would someone with a sociocultural orientation react to these arguments?
Use the sociocultural perspective to critically examine the generalizability of “emerging adulthood” to other cultures
In economically developing countries, there tends to be a distinct cultural split between urban and rural areas
In developing countries emerging adulthood is often experienced in urban areas but rarely in rural areas