Chapter 1: Science and Sustainability: An Introduction to Environmental Science – Lecture Outlines

Page 1

  • Source: Lecture Outlines for Environment: The Science Behind the Stories, James Dauray, Sixth Edition (Chapter 1).
  • Focus: Introduction to environmental science, sustainability, and the scientific method.
  • Purpose: Prepare students to understand how natural systems work, how humans interact with them, and how science informs environmental decisions.

Note: This page sets the stage for the course by presenting the origin of the materials and the scope of topics to be covered in Chapter 1.


Page 2

Lecture objectives

  • Describe the field of environmental science.

  • Compare renewable and nonrenewable resources.

  • Explain the importance of natural resources.

  • Discuss population growth and resource consumption.

  • Explain ecological footprint.

  • Describe the scientific method.

  • Identify major pressures on the global environment.

  • Discuss sustainability and cite examples.

  • These objectives frame the course, linking natural resources, population dynamics, scientific inquiry, and sustainable practices.


Page 3

Our Island, Earth

  • The environment consists of all living and nonliving things around us, including humans, who are part of nature.

  • Environmental science is the study of:

    • how the natural world works,
    • how the environment affects us,
    • how we affect the environment.
  • This page emphasizes the interconnectedness of humans and natural systems and sets up the systems-thinking approach used throughout the course.


Page 4

We rely on natural resources

  • Natural resources are substances and energy sources taken from the environment.

  • Renewable natural resources can replenish over short periods of time.

  • Nonrenewable natural resources are finite in supply and form far more slowly than we use them.

  • Implication: Resource management depends on renewal rates and consumption rates; unsustainable use leads to depletion.


Page 5

  • Some renewable resources, like sunlight, are inexhaustible because they are constantly renewed.

  • Others (timber, water, soil) renew over months, years, or decades and are exhaustible when consumption outpaces renewal.

  • Key distinction: inexhaustible renewables vs exhaustible renewables.


Page 6

Ecosystem services

  • Ecosystem services include:

    • purification of water and air,
    • cycling of nutrients,
    • recycling of water flow,
    • flood prevention,
    • erosion reduction.
  • These services arise from normal ecosystem function.

  • They can be depleted or degraded through overuse, pollution, habitat loss, and climate change.

  • Concept: Humans depend on ecosystem services for survival and well-being; protecting ecosystems sustains these services.


Page 7

Population growth amplifies our impact

  • Agricultural revolution: humans began growing crops, domesticated animals, and settled in villages.

  • Result: population growth rate began to increase.

  • Insight: Early changes in land use and agriculture set the stage for later population expansion and resource use.


Page 8

The industrial revolution and its effects

  • Shift to urban society powered by fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas).

  • Fossil fuels are nonrenewable energy sources.

  • Improvements in medicine and agriculture contributed to population growth.

  • Connection: Technological advances increase carrying capacity and resource demand, influencing sustainability challenges.


Page 9

Resource consumption and environmental pressures

  • Population growth leads to increased consumption of the planet’s resources.

  • An ecological footprint expresses this consumption as the area of land and water required to provide resources or absorb waste for an individual or population.

  • Framework: Footprint accounting helps visualize pressure on ecosystems and informs policy and conservation strategies.


Page 10

  • Our species is estimated to be using 64\% more of the planet’s renewable resources than are sustainably available.

  • This condition is called an overshoot: we are surpassing Earth's capacity to sustainably support us.

  • Implication: Immediate and long-term strategies are needed to reduce overshoot, including efficiency improvements, population stabilization, and changes in consumption patterns.


Page 11

Conserving Earth’s natural capital: a bank account analogy

  • Natural capital includes all resources and ecosystem services.

  • Living sustainably means not taking more of Earth’s renewable resources than can be replenished.

  • Analogy: This is like living off the interest produced by a savings account; the principal (stock of resources) must be preserved for future withdrawals.

  • Environmental scientists aim to study and develop solutions to problems caused by depleting natural capital.

  • Takeaway: Sustainability requires balancing current needs with future availability.


Page 12

Environmental science is interdisciplinary

  • Environmental science integrates multiple disciplines.

  • Natural sciences study the life-supporting systems and physical processes.

  • Social sciences examine human interactions, institutions, policies, and behavior.

  • Central idea: Complex environmental problems require cross-disciplinary approaches for understanding and solutions.


Page 13

Distinctions among related fields

  • Environmental science vs environmental studies vs environmentalism:

    • Environmental science emphasizes natural sciences and empirical inquiry.
    • Environmental studies emphasizes social sciences and humanities perspectives.
    • Environmentalism is a social movement advocating for environmental protection, not a scientific discipline.
  • Importance: Clarifies scope and methodology across these related but distinct fields.


Page 14

The Nature of Science

  • Science is a systematic process for learning about the world and testing our understanding.

  • Many societal improvements (transportation, resource management) are informed by science.

  • Theme: Science provides a framework for evidence-based decision making and policy.


Page 15

How scientists test ideas

  • Descriptive science collects basic information about organisms, materials, or systems.

  • Hypothesis-driven science seeks deeper explanations of how and why things occur.

  • Experiments test hypotheses within the framework of the scientific method.

  • Distinction: Data collection vs theory-driven hypothesis testing.


Page 16

The scientific method (traditional approach)

  • Technique for testing ideas via a formal series of logical steps.

  • First, an observation is made about a phenomenon to be explained.

  • Core idea: Observation leads to questions that guide hypothesis formation and experimental testing.


Page 17

From observation to hypothesis

  • Example question: What causes surface algae to grow heavily on a nearby pond?

  • A testable explanation (hypothesis): Agricultural fertilizers running into the pond cause algae to increase.

  • Process: Observation -> Question -> Hypothesis.


Page 18

From hypothesis to prediction and testing

  • Prediction: If agricultural fertilizers are added to a pond, then the quantity of algae will increase.

  • Next step: Conduct an experiment to test the prediction.

  • Core idea: Hypotheses generate testable predictions to be evaluated experimentally.


Page 19

Variables in experiments

  • Experiments manipulate conditions that can change" called variables.

  • Independent variable: The variable that the researcher changes (e.g., fertilizer input).

  • Dependent variable: The variable measured in response (e.g., quantity of algae).

  • Example: Fertilizer input (independent) vs algae quantity (dependent).


Page 20

Controlled experiments and data collection

  • In a controlled experiment, two identical groups are tested:
    • Control: not exposed to the independent variable (e.g., pond with no fertilizer runoff).
    • Treatment: exposed to the independent variable (e.g., pond with fertilizer runoff).
  • Data are collected to compare outcomes between groups.

Page 21

Data types: quantitative measurements

  • Researchers aim for quantitative data expressed with numbers, enabling statistical analysis.
  • Examples:
    • Dry mass of algae per unit volume of water.
    • Percent of water surface covered by algae.

Page 22

Data visualization

  • Graphs reveal patterns and trends in data.
  • Line graphs: Show change over time.
  • Pie charts: Show proportions of a whole.

Page 23

Statistical analysis

  • Statistical tests assess the strength and reliability of observed patterns.
  • Concepts:
    • Correlation between two variables.
    • Averaged measurements between two groups.

Page 24

Evaluating hypotheses

  • Data and analysis may disprove a hypothesis, leading to rejection and new experimental design.
  • A hypothesis may be supported but is never proven conclusively.
  • Alternative explanations may be proposed and tested.
  • Example question: Does the fertilizer kill fish and other animals that consume the algae?

Page 25

Scientific process vs scientific method (summarized diagrams)

  • Two representations:

    • Scientific process (conducted by the scientific community): Observations → Questions → Hypothesis → Predictions → Test → Results → Publication → Peer review → Repeatability → Theory → (potential acceptance or revision) → New questions.
    • Scientific method (used by an individual researcher): Observations → Questions → Hypothesis → Predictions → Test → Results → Publication → Peer review → Repeatability → Theory.
  • Outcome: If a hypothesis survives peer review and repeated testing, it may contribute to a theory.

  • Theory: A broad explanation that integrates many hypotheses and is widely supported.


Page 26

Testing hypotheses in different ways

  • Manipulative (experimental) experiments: Researchers actively control the independent variable (e.g., the pond algae study).
  • Natural experiments: Occur when controlled experiments are not possible; dependent variables are naturally occurring (e.g., climate change impacts).
  • Correlation: Scientists look for statistical relationships among variables.
  • Example: A survey of 50 ponds reveals that ponds fed by fertilizer runoff have seven times more algae growth.

Page 27

The scientific process after data collection

  • Findings are submitted to a scientific journal for peer critique.
  • Reproducibility: Other scientists must be able to reproduce results.
  • If hypotheses withstand peer review and replication, they contribute to theory.

Page 28

Paradigm shifts in science

  • As knowledge accumulates, attitudes and interpretations may change.
  • A paradigm is a dominant scientific view.
  • A paradigm shift occurs when the dominant view changes due to new ideas and evidence.
  • Example: The shift from an Earth-centered (geocentric) to a Sun-centered (heliocentric) solar system in the 16th century.

Page 29

Achieving sustainable solutions

  • Sustainability challenge: Living in ways that Earth's resources can sustain us into the future.
  • Key components:
    • Conserving resources for future generations,
    • Developing long-term solutions to environmental problems,
    • Maintaining fully-functional ecological systems.

Page 30

Population, consumption, and global impact

  • More than 2\times 10^5 people are added daily to the planet.

  • Consumption has increased rapidly, but not equally across populations.

  • Economic inequality: The 20 wealthiest nations have 55\times the per capita income of the 20 poorest nations.

  • Wealth distribution in the U.S.: The wealthiest 10% own more than 70\% of total wealth.

  • Takeaway: Population growth and unequal consumption patterns drive environmental impact.


Page 31

Ecological footprint comparisons

  • The ecological footprint of an average U.S. citizen is much greater than that of someone in a developing country.

  • Implication: Wealth and lifestyle choices influence resource demand and environmental pressure.


Page 32

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) findings

  • Over the past 50 years, humans have altered ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than ever.

  • Changes to ecosystems have contributed to net gains in human well-being but at the cost of ecosystem degradation and worsening poverty for some.

  • Ecosystem degradation could worsen during this century.

  • Reversing degradation is possible but requires significant modification of policies, institutions, and practices.

  • Significance: Provides a global assessment of ecosystem services, human well-being, and policy implications.


Page 33

Environmental science prepares you for the future

  • Movements to reduce ecosystem degradation:

    • Campus sustainability initiatives aiming to reduce ecological footprints,
    • Environmental literacy to inform the public about Earth’s physical and living systems.
  • Takeaway: Environmental science equips individuals to participate in sustainability efforts and informed civic actions.