Lecture 3 - PHIL222: Truth Tables and Logical Propositions
Preliminaries
Truth Tables
Negation (¬)
- Truth Table:
- If α is true, ¬α (negation of α) is false, and vice versa.
Conjunction (∧)
- Definition: A conjunction is true only if both conjuncts are true.
- Truth Table:
- Has 4 rows due to two component propositions.
Disjunction (∨)
- Definition: A disjunction is true if at least one disjunct is true.
- Truth Table:
- Is inclusive; true if at least one is true.
Conditional (→)
- Definition: A conditional is false only if the antecedent is true and the consequent is false.
- Truth Table:
α | β | (α → β) |
|
---|
T | T | T |
|
T | F | F |
|
F | T | T |
|
F | F | T | |
| | | |
Biconditional (↔) | | | |
- Definition: A biconditional is true if both propositions have the same truth value.
- Truth Table:
α | β | (α ↔ β) |
|
---|
T | T | T |
|
T | F | F |
|
F | T | F |
|
F | F | T | |
| | | |
Truth Values of Complex Propositions | | | |
Example: Evaluate (¬P ∧ (Q ∨ R)) given P=T, Q=F, R=F.
- Compute ¬P: T -> F
- Compute (Q ∨ R): F ∨ F -> F
- Final computation: F ∧ F = F
- Thus, (¬P ∧ (Q ∨ R)) is false.
Another Example: Evaluate ((A ↔ B) → (¬A ∨ B)) given A=F, B=F.
- A ↔ B: F ↔ F = T
- ¬A: F -> T
- ¬A ∨ B: T ∨ F = T
- Final computation: T → T = T
Building Truth Tables
- General Approach: List all possible combinations of truth values for component propositions to fill out the truth table.
- Number of Rows: Each component doubles the number of rows:
- 1 component: 2^1 = 2 rows
- 2 components: 2^2 = 4 rows
- 3 components: 2^3 = 8 rows
- n components: 2^n rows
Complex Proposition Example
- Setup: Create a truth table for ((P → Q) ∧ (P ∧ ¬Q)). Enter all combinations of truth values for P and Q, then compute each segment step-by-step.
Conclusion
Truth tables are fundamental in assessing the truth values of complex propositions in propositional logic, allowing logic operators to be understood and analyzed systematically.
The process applies universally regardless of the structure of the proposition, reinforcing the consistency of logical analysis.