Ethics and Decision Making
Police Discretion
Exercise of individual choice or judgement.
Police must have autonomy, common sense, and interpret the law.
Criminal law must often times be interpreted.
Limitations of police resources.
Courts, jails also have limited capacity
Factors That Influence Discretion
Situation, setting, and suspect.
Every situation is unique requiring officers to analyze the context.
Officers should not make decisions based soley on gender, race, or appearance.
Officers should consider severity of the offense and potential for harm
Departmental policy and culture.
Range of behaviors that may be permitted.
Department’s leadership determines how officers police.
Police subculture can factor into work in problematic ways.
The law
The law has many gray areas.
Advantages and disadvantages to limiting discretion
Consistency is one advantage.
Unnecessary arrests can be a disadvantage
Political and economic pressure
Police are subject to politics and hot-button issues
Department leaders have to answer to government officials.
The Challenge of Discretion
The consequences of poor discretion can have severe outcomes.
Police must be role models to the community
If public trust is broken, the criminal justice system may be questioned
Quotas
Number of fixed citations or stops that officers are required to make
Biased enforcement can occur as a result.
Quotas are unethical and often illegal
Agencies may deny using quotas
Numbers based on policing can send the wrong message to the public
Quotas can call into question the goals of law enforcement
Problem can be intensified by pressure to write citations as source of revenue.
Ethics and Police Conduct
Ethics is concerned with what is morally right and wrong.
Community-oriented policing relates to ethical decision-making
Police agencies should emphasize ethics and discipline officers for unethical behavior
Ethics in Police Education
Research suggests some tolerance for unethical behavior
Police emphasis on loyalty can undermine ethics.
Ethics education must engage officers.
Law enforcement must engage officers.
Law enforcement academy must teach ethical decision making.
Evaluating Police Ethics
1972 Knapp Commission findings
Referred to officers who accept wrongdoings as grass eaters
Reluctance to report wrongdoing is nonfeasance
Nonfeasance can be result of police subculture
Loyalty to the group is seen as virtue
Code of Conduct and federal laws require officers not to condone unethical behavior
Number of factors influence police ethics
Changing moral standards and lack of moral consensus
Individuals rejecting personal responsibility
High levels of frustration
Conflicting perceptions of role and expectations
Failure to draw moral lines in policy, training, discipline
Code of Conduct adopted by International Association of Chiefs of Police
Standards based on moral principles
Emphasis on role modeling by leaders
Leaders conduct is evaluated in three ways.
Leaders may be poor role models in some cases
Administrators intentionally ignoring ethical issues
Supervisors may perceive unethical practices from their leaders.
Unethical behavior by some tarnishes everyone’s reputations
Those who tell the truth may face backlash
Biased Enforcement and Racial Profiling
Racial profiling occurs when race is part of decision making
Can be grounds for disciplinary action
Action is still profiling if it is one factor among many
Publicized cases of racial profiling
All officers should be aware of consequences
Harassment of individuals is also unacceptable
Leadership and Improving Decision-Making
Background
Clear code of ethical conduct must be established
Chiefs and supervisors must lead by example
Recognize the importance of proper discretion
Guidelines for discretion must be clarified
Leaders must address unethical conduct openly.
56% of people in survey rated police honesty as very high
Rewarding ethical behavior
Law enforcement leaders can encourage ethical behavior
Media Relations
Police-media relations can be problematic
Policing has become a high visibility profession
Police should be transparent with media
Media should be a tool and a partner
Social media can be used to counter false information
Intolerance of Malfeasance
Zero tolerance policies toward misconduct
National Institute of Justice study
Do they know the rules?
How much support for those rules?
Are staff familiar with disciplinary actions?
Do staff view these measures as fair?
How willing are staff to report misconduct?
NIJ study stated that an agencies culture may be more important than hiring practices
Agencies must take action against unethical behavior
Report’s recommendations for encouraging officers to report misconduct.