Notes on Realist Theory of International Politics

Politics Among Nations by Hans J. Morgenthau

Works by Hans J. Morgenthau:
  • "Politics Among Nations" (1948, multiple editions)
  • "In Defense of the National Interest" (1951)
  • "The Purpose of American Politics" (1960)
  • "Principles and Problems of International Politics" (edited with Kenneth W. Thompson, 1950)

A Realist Theory of International Politics

Theory Evaluation
  • A theory of international politics must be judged empirically and pragmatically, not abstractly.
  • It should bring order and meaning to complex phenomena.
  • The theory needs to be consistent with facts and internally logical.
Two Schools of Thought
  • One school believes in achieving a rational and moral political order based on universally valid abstract principles.
    • Assumes human goodness and malleability.
    • Blames social order failures on lack of knowledge, obsolete institutions, or depraved individuals.
    • Trusts education, reform, and force to remedy defects.
  • The other school believes the world's imperfections result from inherent forces in human nature.
    • One must work with these forces.
    • Moral principles are approximated through balancing interests and settling conflicts.
    • Sees checks and balances as a universal principle.
    • Appeals to historic precedent and aims for the lesser evil.
Political Realism
  • Deals with human nature as it is and historic processes as they take place.
Six Principles of Political Realism
  1. Objective Laws:

    • Politics is governed by objective laws rooted in human nature.
    • Understanding these laws is necessary to improve society.
    • These laws are impervious to our preferences.
    • Rational theory can reflect these objective laws.
    • Distinguishes between objective truth and subjective judgment.
    • Human nature hasn't changed since classical times.
    • Theory consists of ascertaining facts and giving them meaning through reason.
    • Foreign policy character is ascertained through political acts and their consequences.
    • Approach political reality with a rational outline to understand foreign policy.
    • Test rational hypotheses against facts to give meaning to international politics.
  2. Interest Defined as Power:

    • The concept of interest defined as power is the main signpost.
    • Links reason and facts.
    • Sets politics as an autonomous sphere apart from economics, ethics, aesthetics, or religion.
    • Statesmen think and act in terms of interest defined as power.
    • This allows us to understand and anticipate their actions.
    • Provides rational discipline in action and continuity in foreign policy.
    • Guards against the fallacy of focusing on motives and ideological preferences.
    • Motives are illusive and distorted.
    • There is no necessary correlation between motives and the quality of foreign policy.
    • Good intentions do not guarantee morally praiseworthy or politically successful policies.
    • What matters is the intellectual ability to comprehend essentials and translate them into successful action.
    • Political theory judges the political qualities of intellect, will, and action.
    • Avoid equating foreign policies with philosophic or political sympathies.
    • Distinguish between "official duty" (national interest) and "personal wish" (moral values).
    • Requires a sharp distinction between the desirable and the possible.
    • Deviations from rationality occur due to personality, prejudice, and weaknesses.
    • Democratic control can impair rationality.
    • Aims to present the rational essence of foreign policy.
    • Modern psychology might provide a counter-theory of irrational politics.
    • The Indochina War suggests factors like:
      • Imposing simplistic pictures of the world.
      • Refusing to correct misperceptions.
      • Using intelligence to reinterpret reality to fit policy.
      • Egotism widening the gap between perception and reality.
      • Urge to close the gap through action creating the illusion of mastery.
    • Difference between international politics and rational theory is like a photograph versus a painted portrait.
    • Political realism contains a normative element.
    • Stresses rational elements of political reality to make it intelligible.
    • A rational foreign policy minimizes risks and maximizes benefits.
    • Theory must focus on rational elements, and foreign policy ought to be rational.
  3. Interest as an Objective Category

    • Realism assumes interest defined as power is universally valid, but its meaning isn't fixed.
    • The idea of interest is essential to politics.
    • Thucydides: "Identity of interests is the surest of bonds."
    • Lord Salisbury: "The only bond of union that endures is the absence of all clashing interests."
    • George Washington: Interest is the governing principle for most people.
    • Max Weber: Interests dominate actions, but ideas determine the tracks of those actions.
    • The kind of interest depends on the political and cultural context.
    • Power includes anything that establishes control of man over man.
    • Power can be disciplined by moral ends or be untamed and barbaric.
    • Realism doesn't assume current conditions can't be changed.
    • The balance of power can operate under stability and peace.
    • The connection between interest and the nation-state is a product of history.
    • The realist position doesn't prevent replacing nation-states with larger units.
    • Transformation can be achieved through manipulating perennial forces.
    • Cannot transform by confronting political reality with an abstract ideal.
  4. Moral Significance of Political Action:

    • Aware of the tension between moral command and political action.
    • Universal moral principles must be filtered through concrete circumstances.
    • Individuals can sacrifice themselves for a moral principle, but states cannot put moral disapprobation above national survival.
    • No political morality without prudence.
    • Prudence is the supreme virtue in politics.
    • Political ethics judges action by political consequences.
    • Lincoln: Do the best you can, and if the end is right, criticism won't matter.
  5. Moral Aspirations and Moral Laws:

    • Refuses to identify a nation's moral aspirations with universal moral laws.
    • Distinguishes between truth and idolatry.
    • Nations are tempted to clothe actions in moral purposes.
    • Belief that all nations are under God's judgment differs from believing God is always on one's side.
    • Equating nationalism with Providence is morally indefensible.
    • Concept of interest defined as power saves us from moral excess and political folly.
    • If we look at all nations pursuing interests, we can do justice to them.
    • Moderation in policy reflects moderation of moral judgment.
  6. Difference Between Realism and Other Schools:

    • Distinct intellectual and moral attitude.
    • Maintains autonomy of the political sphere.
    • Thinks in terms of interest defined as power.
    • Subordinates other standards to those of politics.
    • Takes issue with the "legalistic-moralistic approach."
    • Examples:
      • Soviet Union attacking Finland (1939): France and Great Britain focused on the legal violation rather than the impact on their interests and power balance.
      • Communist government of China: The Western world focused on moral principles rather than the interests and power dynamics.
      • Great Britain entering World War I: Could be justified realistically (preventing hostile power control of Low Countries) or legalistically-moralistically (violation of Belgium's neutrality).
    • The realist defense doesn't disregard other modes of thought but assigns each its proper sphere.
    • Based on a pluralistic conception of human nature (economic, political, moral, religious man, etc.).
    • To understand one facet, abstract from others and apply appropriate standards.
    • Economics developed as an autonomous theory through this process.
    • Aims to contribute to similar development in politics.
    • A theory based on these principles won't meet unanimous approval.
    • Runs counter to trends that disparage power and those that can't face the truth of politics.
    • The human mind disguises and distorts the truth.
    • A theory understanding international politics as it is must overcome psychological resistance.