Summary Judgment
Definition
According to RHC Order 14, summary judgment is a judgment obtained by the plaintiff without a full trial.
It's designed to be a speedy way of obtaining judgment, thereby avoiding delays, risks, and substantial costs.
A summary judgment is a valid and legitimate judgment.
Operation
The plaintiff must demonstrate that the case falls within the scope of RHC Order 14.
The writ must have been correctly served to the defendant.
The defendant should return the acknowledgment of service (Form 14) within the prescribed time, indicating an intention to contest the proceedings.
The Order 14 procedure should not be abused and is designed for clear-cut cases with no arguable defence (Sin Hua Bank Ltd v Sung Foo Kee Ltd [1993]).
Procedure
The plaintiff initiates the RHC Order 14 procedure by an inter partes summons supported by affirmation.
This summons is served on the defendant 10 clear days before the hearing day.
The affirmation must state the plaintiff's belief that the defendant has no defence to the claim.
Once the Order 14 application is made, the burden shifts to the defendant to demonstrate a triable issue or other reasons for a full trial (Manciple Ltd v Char On Man [1995]).
The defendant can file an affirmation in reply at least 3 days before the hearing date, outlining their proposed defence.
The initial hearing before a master is typically a 15-minute “call-over” for directions.
If the defendant contests the application, the application is adjourned for a second hearing, which takes place a few months after the first.
The second hearing is not a “mini-trial”; no witnesses are called. It is based on affirmations and submissions (Ng Shou Chun v Hung Chun San [1994]).
At the second hearing, the master assesses whether there is a triable issue.
Possible Orders by the Master
The master can make one of the following orders:
Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Summons: The summons is dismissed with costs and action proceeds as a normal trial.
Judgment for the Plaintiff: If there is no triable issue, judgment will be given to the plaintiff.
Unconditional Leave for Defendant to Defend: The defendant is granted unconditional leave to defend and proceeds as a normal trial (Billion Silver Development v All Wide Investments Ltd [2000]).
Conditional Leave for Defendant to Defend: The defendant is granted conditional leave to defend where the defence is a bit thin but still arguable (Wu Cho Mei t/a Mui FCR v Wang Suiau Yu [1994]).
Conditions imposed must be reasonable and may include the defendant paying part or the whole of the sum claimed into court.
Conclusion
The summary judgment procedure is meant for cases where the defendant has no arguable defence.
The speaker agrees with the statement about RHC Order 14 in the question, underscoring its purpose and application.