Hiring Call: JD Alignment & Candidate Submission

Conversation appears to be a very brief status-check between (likely) a recruiter and another team member.
Purpose: Ensure alignment on a hiring submission in relation to the job description (JD) and candidate location preferences.

Confirmation of technical connection
- Opening line: “Is it okay now?” / “Yeah. It’s okay now.”
- Implies a quick check that audio or call quality is functioning.
Reference to the Job Description (JD)
- Phrase repeated twice: “According to the JD.”
- Indicates that all subsequent decisions must align with the written JD requirements.
Resume Update Requirement
- “Resume update here.” Likely a reminder/action item: make sure candidate résumé is revised before submission.
Candidate Selection Criteria
- “The simple choose from the location.”
  • Interpretation: shortlist will be simplified by filtering on candidate location.
- “First local prefer.”
  • Priority is to identify local candidates first (i.e.
  geographically closest to client site).
Vendor‐Supplied Candidate
- Mention of “The candidate, a vendor, which is 99\%.”
  • Possibly indicating confidence or suitability level of vendor-provided candidate (99 % fit with JD).
Submission Process
- Phrase “submit submit submit” emphasizes urgency or multiple steps.
- “Bills are Recently relocated.”
  • Could be a note that ‘Bills’ (likely a candidate named Bill) has recently moved; requires confirmation whether that satisfies ‘local’ preference.
Offer of Assistance
- “We can provide you a little bit.” Suggests the speaker can supply extra support or documents (e.g., pay rate details, relocation notes, or résumé tweaks).

Update candidate résumé to match JD keywords.
Filter pipeline by location:
1. Local candidates first.
2. Recently relocated individuals considered next.
Verify vendor candidate’s 99\% JD match and finalize submission package.
Clarify any related billing/relocation nuances for the candidate named Bill(s).