IM

chapt 7

American and Texas Government - Judiciary Notes

Overview of the Judiciary

  • The Judiciary refers to the judicial branch of government in the American and Texas systems.

    • Developed by Shannon Bow O'Brien, Ph.D.

    • Created under the College of Liberal Arts at the University of Texas at Austin.

Section 7: Judiciary

Introduction
  • Introduction to the concepts of the judiciary in American and Texas contexts.

Historical Context

  • Framers' Perspective:

    • The Framers of the Constitution did not express significant concern regarding potential tyranny from the judicial branch.

    • Article III of the Constitution contains vague language that grants Congress the power to establish lower federal courts.

    • The concept of judicial review is not explicitly stated in Article III of the Constitution.

Important Legal Precedent
  • Marbury vs. Madison:

    • This landmark case clarifies the powers of judicial review, establishing the judiciary's authority to invalidate laws that conflict with the Constitution.

Power of the Courts

  • Judicial Independence:

    • To protect justices from public whims, they are given life terms in office.

  • Checks on Judicial Power:

    • Congress can:

    • Alter the jurisdiction of the courts.

    • Propose constitutional amendments to reverse judicial decisions, pending ratification.

    • Impeach and remove federal judges.

    • The President is responsible for appointing all federal judges.

    • Notably, the U.S. Supreme Court has been located in its current building since 1935.

Early Federal Courts

  • Judiciary Act of 1789:

    • This act provides the organizational structure for federal courts.

    • During the latter half of its first session, Congress deliberated extensively on establishing federal judiciary systems.

  • Marshall Court (1801-1835):

    • This court met at various locations in the US Capitol from 1810 to 1860 before moving to the Old Senate Chamber until 1935.

Powers of the Supreme Court

Jurisdictions
  • Supreme Court powers include:

    • Original Jurisdiction: The Court hears cases first, particularly those involving diplomats, ambassadors, and when a state is a party.

    • Appellate Jurisdiction: Hears cases on appeal from lower courts.

  • Jurisdiction Claims: The Supreme Court has a significant role in interpreting laws through both constitutional and statutory interpretations.

Interpretation Theories
  • Living Constitution: This theory suggests that the Constitution is a dynamic document that adapts to contemporary society.

  • Statutory Construction: The process of interpreting the meaning of statutes.

  • The Court can decide to refuse to hear a case based on its discretion.

Structure of the American Legal System

  • Dual System: Comprising both federal and state courts.

    • Trial Courts: Initial courts where cases are heard.

    • Appellate Courts: Courts that review the decisions of trial courts.

  • Types of Cases:

    • Criminal Cases: Involving violations of criminal laws.

    • Civil Cases: Disputes between individuals or organizations.

    • Plea Bargain: An agreement between a defendant and prosecutor.

    • Class Action Suit: A lawsuit filed by one or more individuals on behalf of a larger group.

    • Standing: The legal right to initiate a lawsuit.

Court Systems and Case Load

Federal Court System
  • Original Jurisdiction Cases: Comprises about 5% of cases which include diplomatic and ambassadorial matters, and cases involving states.

  • Legislative Courts: Established under Article I, Section 8, for specific technical expertise (e.g., U.S. Court of Military Appeals).

  • U.S. Tax Court: Hears tax-related cases.

Appeals Statistics (2022)
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals: 13 courts with a total of 2022 - 179 judges, handling around 50,000 cases annually.

  • State Supreme Courts: Approximately 85,000 cases per year.

  • U.S. Supreme Court: Issued 70-90 opinions during the 2021-2022 term, agreeing to hear 68 cases, dismissing 4, and removing 1. The Court received 7,000-8,000 appeals, with about 100-140 granting writs of certiorari.

  • Trial and District Courts: Significant volume of cases:

    • State Trial Courts: 89 million cases per year.

    • 94 U.S. District Courts: 274,000-300,000 cases per year in 2018.

Supreme Court Structure

Composition & Jurisdiction
  • Current Justices: Originally 6 justices; increased to 9 justices in 1869.

  • Jurisprudential Roles:

    • Writ of Certiorari: A document issued when the Court agrees to hear a case.

    • Amicus Curiae: Briefs submitted by non-parties to offer information on relevant issues.

  • Majority Opinion Types:

    • Opinion of the Court: The official statement of the ruling.

    • Plurality Opinion: Supports a decision without majority agreement.

    • Concurring Opinion: Agreement with the outcome but for different reasons.

    • Dissenting Opinion: Disagreement with the majority view.

    • Per Curiam Opinion: An unsigned opinion from the court.

    • In Forma Pauperis: Allows individuals without funds to pursue legal action.

  • Order of Justices in 2022:

    • Seated Justices: Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan.

    • Standing Justices: Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Federal Judicial Circuits

Overview
  • Thirteen Federal Judicial Circuits: Each handles a designated geographical area of cases.

  • Special Circuit - Federal Circuit: Hears cases related to patents and government contracts.

Activism vs. Restraint

Judicial Philosophies
  • Judicial Activism:

    • Judges actively shape doctrine to align with personal views of the Constitution and prevailing social policies.

  • Judicial Restraint:

    • Judges take a conservative approach, deferring to policies set forth by elected branches unless there is a clear constitutional violation.

    • Emphasis on original intention and strict constructionism.

    • Test Case: A significant court case intended to establish a legal precedent.

Activist Viewpoints
  • Characteristics of Activist Judges:

    • Regular use of the power to declare laws unconstitutional, viewing it as a legitimate tool of governance rather than a measure of last resort.

    • Challenging the notion that the judiciary is inherently the least democratic of the three government branches.

  • Note: Judicial activism is not tied to a particular political ideology (liberal or conservative).

  • Importance in identifying which justices lean towards striking down congressional statutes.