International History, 1870-1945

International History, 1870-1945 - Coursebook Notes

Chapter 1: Empire and the Emergence of World Powers 1870–1919

  • Learning Objectives:

    • Understand economic, social, and cultural background of European imperialism.

    • Learn how, when, and why countries developed empires in Africa and China.

    • Understand the impact of empire-building on relations between European countries.

    • Understand the circumstances of Japan and the USA and their rapid development into world powers.

  • Timeline: Key events from 1867 (Opening of the Suez Canal) to 1918 (Wilson's Fourteen Points speech).

Introduction to European Imperialism
  • European nations sought overseas possessions for wealth, prestige, and power (traditional pursuit).

  • Examples:

    • Spain in South America (16th century).

    • Britain and France in North America and India (18th century).

    • Britain's Empire (early 19th century): New Zealand to Canada.

    • Portugal exploring the African coast, Dutch competition from 17th century.

  • Early 19th-century decline in expansion due to costs (expensive wars and maintaining control). Britain lost control of 13 North American Colonies and Spain lost influence in South America.

  • Desire to exploit profitable ventures remained, leading to a new wave of imperialism (1871-1914) with focus shifting to Africa and Asia.

1.1 Why was Imperialism a Significant Force for Late 19th-Century Europe?

Economic and Political Motives

  • Mercantilism: Powerful European nations sought to increase wealth through controlled trade (limiting imports, increasing exports, accumulating gold/silver).

  • Overseas possessions offered cheap raw materials, labor, valuable goods (spices, silks), and guaranteed markets.

  • Private companies/businessmen profited (e.g., slave trade).

  • Decline of Mercantilism: Expensive to maintain control/protect trade routes, leading to wars (e.g., Britain in North America).

  • Economic theories (Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations, 1776) suggested wealth based on production, not gold/silver and that imperial expansion, government control was unnecessary and undesirable. Government interference discouraged investment.

Economic Motives: Industrialization

  • Industrial Revolution prompted the need for raw materials and new markets. Industrialists sought investment opportunities.

  • Britain: Enjoyed early advantages (steam power, textiles, iron/steel). "The Workshop of the World" produced goods quickly/cheaply.

  • Competition: From European rivals, the USA. Railways (& Zollverein) transformed German states by 1850.

  • France: Expanded commercial interests in Africa (Algeria 1830-47), developed the 2nd most powerful navy by 1850-70 with bases in the Indian Ocean/Indo-China.

Economic Motives: The ‘Long Depression’

  • Price deflation (1873-1896) due to rapid industrialization > production outstripping demand.

  • Declining wages and job losses pressured governments to protect economies, leading to competition for overseas' markets.

Economic Motives: Competition for Raw Materials

  • Need for cotton, copper, rubber, tin (Africa & Asia).

  • Products valued in Europe: tea, silk (China), gold, diamonds (Transvaal), palm oil (West Africa).

  • John Hobson (1902): Imperialists needed new markets/investment outlets. Expansion necessary for production.

Political Motives: Growth of Nationalism

  • Borders in Europe settled by 1871. Expansion was sought overseas to enhance wealth, power, prestige, and influence.

  • Nationalism increased: Germany and Italy (establishing themselves), France wished to recover from the Franco-Prussian War (1870–71). Britain emphasized navy power (Naval Defence Act, 1889: ‘two power standard’).

  • Overseas possessions = national pride. France had a duty to extend culture/religion to backwards people. Bishop Lefèbvre, Pellerin and Puginier helped French military forces take control over parts of Vietnam.

Political Motives: Imperialism as Social Policy

  • Implemented due to emergence of a large working class demanded reform. Some senior politicians viewed overseas expansion as a way of diverting popular attention away from social, economic, and political inequalities.

  • Overseas expansion would provide finance for social reform and improved condition of working classes.

Political Motives: Strategic Control of Key Regions

  • Britain established a port in Cape Colony in southern Africa to protect ships trading with India/Far East.

  • Suez Canal (1869) shortened voyages; Britain took over Egyptian administration in 1882 to protect trade route

Activity 1.1 Discussion on Ferry and Fabri's justifications for imperial expansion.

The Emergence of ‘New Imperialism’
  • 1871-1914. Disagreement among historians on the 'newness' of it all. Some see it as earlier overseas efforts while others saw it as being fundamentally different.

Nature of ‘New Imperialism’

  • Geographic scope: Focused on Africa/Asia. Exploring African interiors: minerals/raw materials (Livingstone). Henri Mouhot expeditions to Siam, Cambodia, Laos, paved way for imperial control over Indo-China.

  • Maintaining peaceful relations: Prevent constant warfare > Treaty of Berlin (1885) laid rules for expansion in Africa to avoid confrontation > imperial nations collaborated against China.

  • New imperial countries: USA sought Central/South America control & Asian trade > developed navies/bases.

  • Japan: Industrial/military revolutions created conflict (Russo-Japanese war), subsequent rivalry with the USA.

Factors Enabling ‘New Imperialism’

  • Medical Improvement: Quinine (1817) treated malaria > access to African interior/Asian jungles > Medical advancement.

  • Technological Advancement: high-quality steel mass-produced (Bessemer’s system, after 1856), railroads and steamships for transport. Iron-hulled ships navigated rivers. Improved communication (telegraph). Fast-firing rifles, machine guns, heavy artillery overpowered Africans.

Opposition to Slavery

  • European governments banned the slave trade by 1820 saying that slavery was ‘repugnant to the principles of natural justice.