Power sharing
Belgium
A small country in Europe
59% lived in flemish regions and speaks the Dutch language
40% of people lived in the wallonia region and speak French
1% of the population speaks German
In the capital, Brussels, 80% of people speak French and 20% speaks Dutch
It has borders with france, Germany, Netherlands and Luxembourg
Population over 1 crore half the population of haryana
Reasons for tension in Belgium
The minority French speaking Community was relatively rich and powerful
This was resented by Dutch speaking Community who got the benefit of economic development and education much later
This led to tension between the two communities during the 1950s and 1960s
The tension was more acute in Brussels
Dutch speakers were the majority in the country but a minority in the capital
Sri lanka introduction
Sri lanka has a diverse population
Sri lanka got independence in 1948
The major social groups are- sinhala and Tamil speakers
74% were sinhala speakers
18% were Tamil speakers
Among tamils there are 2 sub groups- sri lankan tamils and Indian tamils
13% of the Tamil group was the sri lankan tamils
Sri lankan tamils were native to the country
The rest whose forefathers came from India as Plantation workers during colonial period were the Indian tamils
7% of Christians spoke both sinhala and Tamil
Most Sinha speakers were Buddhists
Tamil speakers were either hindu or Muslims
Majoritariansim in sri lanka
Steps taken to establish sinhala supremacy
In 1956, an act was passed to recognize sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding tamils
The government followed preferential policies that favored Sinhala applicants for university positions or government jobs
A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism
The impact
All these measures increased the feeling of alienation among sri lankan tamils
They felt sinhala Buddhists leaders were not sensitive towards thier culture and language
They felt the government and constitution policies denied them equal political rights
Tamils were discriminated against getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored their interests.
Results
The relations between the sinhala and Tamils were strained
The sri lankan tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official language
They also demanded regional autonomy and Equality for opportunities in securing education and jobs
Sri lankan tamils were denied repeatedly
In 1980s, political organizations were formed and demanded an independent tamil Eelam (state) in the northern and Eastern parts of sri lanka.
This resulted in civil war, which caused a terrible set back to the social, cultural and economic life of the country and thousands of people of both the communities were killed. It ended in 2009.
Accommodation in Belgium
In Belgium there were differences and diversity in the population but the Belgium leaders took a different path. They recognized the existence of regional differences an cultural diversities.
Belgium model
Between 1970 &1993, they amended thier constitution 4 times so as to work out an arrangement that would enable everyone to live together.
Number of Dutch and French speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government to ensure that decisions are not being made unilaterally.
More powers of central government is given to state government of the 2 regions of the country. state government are not subordinate to central government.
Brussels have a separate govt in which both the communities have equal representation.
A Third kind of govt, community government, elected by people of one language community- Dutch, French,German- wherever they live.
Powers of community government
The community government has powers regarding Cultural, educational and language related issues.
Results
Avoided civic strives between the two major communities.
Avoided Division of country on linguistic lines.
Many countries of Europe came together to form European union, Brussels chosen as it's headquarters.
Why power sharing is desirable?
For 2 reasons- Prudential and moral
Prudential
Power sharing is good because it helps us to reduce the possibility of conflict between social group.
Prudential reasons for power sharing
Social conflicts often leads to political instability and violence, power sharing ensures political stability.
Imposing Majoritariansim may not be effective in the long run
Tyranny of majority isn't only oppressive towards minority; it often brings ruins to the majority aswell.
Moral
Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy.
Moral reasons for power sharing
Power sharing is the very spirit if democracy.
People have the right to be consulted on how they're governed.
A Democratic rule includes sharing Power with those who are affected and who have to live with its effect.
A legitimate government is one where one citizen, through participation, acquire a stake in the system.
While Prudential reasons stress that power sharing will bring out better outcomes,Moral reasons emphasise the very act of power.
Forms of power sharing