RELIBAILITY AND VALIDITY IN DIAGNOSIS
RELIABILITY
Diagnosis of schizophrenia must be repeatable and reach the same conclusions at two points in time
Inter-rater reliability measured using a kappa score between 0 and 1, 0.7 is considered good
In DSM-V field trials, diagnosis only had a kappa score of 0.46
\n
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN DIAGNOSIS
Copeland gave 134 US and 194 British psychiatrists a description of a patient where 69% of US diagnosed but only 2% of British did showing cultural differences can affect reliability of diagnosis
Luhrmann found hearing voices influenced by cultural environment as 60 people from Ghana, India and the US were interviewed and those in Ghana and India reported positive experiences of voices such as offering advice whereas US reported more violent and hateful because its more common in the West so isn’t an inevitable feature
\n
EVALUATION: RELIABILITY
LACK OF INTER-RATER RELIABILITY ✅
Little evidence that DSM is routinely used with high reliability by mental health clinicians
Whaley - inter-reader reliability correlations in the diagnosis of schizophrenia as 0.11
\n
UNRELIABLE SYMPTOMS ✅
For diagnosis, only one of the characteristics of bizarre delusions is required
When 50 psychiatrists were asked to differentiate between bizarre and non-bizarre delusions, inter-rater reliability correlations were only 0.40
\n
CULTURAL DIFFERENCES ✅
Ethnic minorities experience less distress because of protective characteristics and social structures
Supported by 184 white Americans, African Americans and Latinos diagnosed with schizophrenia
\n
GENDER BIAS
Occurs when accuracy of diagnosis is dependant of the gender of an individual
Accuracy of diagnostic judgement varies on gender-based diagnostic criteria or stereotypes
Some diagnostic criteria in DSM-V argue that criteria are causes towards one gender
Clinicians in the US equate healthy mental behaviour with male behaviour
Women to be perceived as less mentally healthy
\n \n
SYMPTOM OVERLAP
Despite the claim that classification of positive and negative symptoms would make more valid diagnosis, many are found in other disorders eg bipolar
Ellason and Ross = people with DID have more schizophrenic symptoms than those diagnosed
Most who are diagnosed have sufficient symptoms of other disorders that they could also receive at least one other diagnosis
\n
COMORBIDITY
Common among patients eg substance abuse, anxiety, depression
Buckley = comorbid depression in 50% of patients and 47% have a lifetime diagnosis of comorbid substance abuse
Schizophrenia and OCD occur together more than chance would suggest
Swets = 12% fulfil the diagnostic criteria for OCD with 25% showing symptoms
\n
EVALUATION: VALIDITY
GENDER BIAS SUPPORT ✅
Loring and Powell = 290 male and female psychiatrists diagnosed two case studies
Male or no info = 56%
Females = 20%
Gender bias among female psychiatrists as well as male in 1988
\n
CONSEQUENCES OF COMORBIDITY ✅
Weber = 6 million hospital discharges
Primary diagnosis with schizophrenia also diagnosed with medical problems such as asthma, hypertension and diabetes
Patients tend to receive lower standard of medical care due to psychiatric diagnosis
\n
DIFFERENCES IN PROGNOSIS ✅
20% recover previous level of functioning
10% achieve significant with lasting improvement
30% some improvement
There’s little predictive validity
Psychosocial factors seem to play a role in outcome
\n \n \n \n