Part 1

Introduction to Factor Analysis

  • A statistical technique distinct from other methods.

  • Analyzes individual items forming a scale of psychological constructs rather than composite scores.

  • Aims to find coherent clusters of correlated items that are relatively independent from others.

Key Purpose and Process of Factor Analysis

  • Aims for parsimony by summarizing numerous items into a few components while explaining maximum variance in the correlation matrix.

  • Seeks to identify underlying structures (latent variables) represented by items regarding psychological constructs.

Example of Graduate Student Readiness

  • Aspects include: motivation, intellectual ability, academic performance, family history, health.

  • Items for survey responses run through factor analysis to investigate correlations.

  • Patterns revealed help identify how items cluster into factors reflecting dimensions of graduate readiness.

  • Poor items not aligning with dimensions may be identified for deletion.

Applications of Factor Analysis

  • Extensively used in psychology for:

    • Testing dimensionality of psychometric scales.

    • Development of new scales from a large set of items to a smaller set.

  • Example: Starting with 40 items to assess readiness reduced to 20 items after analysis.

Cautionary Note

  • Factor analysis measures correlation but doesn’t ascertain if remaining items accurately reflect their dimensions.

  • Critical evaluation is essential after performing factor analysis.

Exploratory vs. Confirmatory Factor Analysis

  • Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is not hypothesis testing; requires multiple alterations to arrive at a solution.

  • Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tests hypothesis fit and is done with structured software like AMOS, not SPSS.

  • This course focuses on EFA for foundational understanding.

Starting Point of Factor Analysis

  • The correlation matrix (also termed R matrix) is the initial step—investigating correlations between items.

Case Study: Popularity Construct

  • Variables in survey: talk, social skills, interest, self-talk, selfish, liar.

  • Factor analysis reduces R matrix into smaller dimensions reflecting sociability and consideration.

Factor Loadings

  • Graphing factor loadings helps visualize relationships between items and factors.

  • Factor loadings represent strength of the relationship between an item and the respective factor, akin to a Pearson correlation.

  • Loadings range from -1 to +1; higher is better.

  • Ideal scenario: one factor strongly represents items correlating with it while being weakly related to others.

Guidelines for Factor Loadings
  • Ideal loadings: 0.4 or higher on its factor, while 0.3 or lower on others.

  • Can distinguish factors needed summarizing correlation patterns.

Types of Factor Analysis

  • Two main distinctions:

    • Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).

    • Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (not covered in this unit).

  • EFA types: Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Principal Axis Factoring.

Principal Components Analysis (PCA)

  • Used by researchers focused on observable data.

  • Aims to explain maximum variance with a transformed dataset of linear components.

Principal Axis Factoring

  • Used by researchers interested in latent psychological constructs.

  • Aims to explain common variance among items, disregarding unique variance.

  • PCA treats total variance fully, while Factor Analysis addresses only shared (common) variance.

Commonality in Factor Analysis

  • Communality: Proportion of variance an item shares with other items.

    • Range: 0 (no common variance) to 1 (all variance shared).

  • In PCA, initial commonalities are set at 1 (100% shared).

  • In Factor Analysis, commonalities are lower due to accounting for unique variance first.

Graphical Representation of Variance

  • Visual illustrations help to convey shared and unique variances across items, demonstrating commonality.

Output from SPSS in Factor Analysis

  • Displays initial and after extraction commonalities as criteria for evaluating items.

  • High commonality indicates good representation; low commonality flags potential problematic items.

Mathematical Representation in Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis Equations

  • Factor analysis predicts scores based on measured items from underlying factors.

Principal Components Analysis Equation

  • Describes how items contribute to a linear model and establishes component loadings.

Running Factor Analysis

  • Initially produces as many factors as original items, then retains minimum number required for maximum variance.

  • Both methods produce tables of loadings detailing item-factors relationships.

Utilizing Factor Scores

  • Factor scores depict composite scores for individual factors in place of raw item scores.

  • Various techniques exist for calculating these scores—Anderson Rubin method is recommended for unbiased results in SPSS.

Final Reading Recommendations

  • Chapter 18 in Andy Field's textbook on Exploratory Factor Analysis.

  • Chapter 9 in Mertler's textbook “Advanced Multivariate Statistical Methods”.