Study Notes on the Russian Legislature and Electoral System
Introduction to the Legislature
The legislative structure of Russia is bicameral, consisting of a lower house and an upper house.
Lower House: The Duma
The term "Duma" derives from the Russian word meaning "to think."
Composition:
Total seats: 450
Powers and Functions:
Initiates legislation and has the ability to reject it.
Can override a presidential veto if two-thirds of the members support it.
Responsible for approving the Prime Minister.
Has the ability to call a vote of no confidence against the Prime Minister.
Notably, if this vote of no confidence is exercised three times, the President can dismiss the Duma and call for new elections.
However, this action has not yet occurred.
Historical Context:
Under President Yeltsin, most legislation originated in the Duma.
Under Presidents Putin and Medvedev, legislative initiatives shifted to be primarily top-down.
Upper House: The Federation Council
Composition:
Total seats: 170
Powers and Functions:
Has the authority to reject international treaties.
Approves presidential appointments to the Constitutional Court.
Can declare war and martial law.
Responsible for approving budgetary bills but can be overridden by the Duma with a two-thirds vote.
Generally holds weaker power compared to the Duma.
Electoral System Evolution
Historical Overview:
Transitioning towards democracy, Russia's electoral evolution denotes various systems in use from 1990 to present.
Initially, an SMD (Single Member District) system was used for the Duma.
Following the 1993 Constitution, a mixed electoral system was implemented:
50% plurality SMD
50% proportional representation (PR)
This included a 5% threshold for the Duma.
Resulted in two large parties and some smaller parties often necessary for coalition formation.
Electoral Changes Starting 2007:
In an effort to strengthen United Russia, the number of SMD seats was dropped.
Transitioned solely to a PR system with a 7% threshold, effectively keeping opposition parties at bay.
Parties that failed to meet this threshold had their votes distributed proportionally among those that did.
Created a scenario where parties could gain a higher number of seats than their actual vote percentage.
Significant Change in 2013:
Putin reverted to the mixed system of half SMD, half PR, reducing the threshold back to 5%.
A closed-list PR system was established, making party registration easier.
Registered political parties increased from 7 in 2012 to 76 in 2013.
This development provided the illusion of increased democracy, though it primarily served to strengthen United Russia by fracturing the opposition vote.
Impacts of Electoral Changes on Political Landscape
Election Results Overview:
In the elections prior to these changes, United Russia secured a majority with 238 seats, a notable decline from 2007 amid social protests.
Following the reforms in 2016, United Russia acquired an additional 100 seats, totaling 343 out of 500 seats.
Other party results in 2016 included:
Communist Party: 42 seats (a decrease of 50 from 2011)
Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR): 39 seats (down by 17)
Just Russia: 23 seats (down by 41)
This strategic electoral maneuvering significantly benefited Putin and United Russia.
Changes in Upper House Elections
Historical Structure:
Originally, the upper house was made up of a governor and a Duma representative from each of the regions, numbering around 90 regions, now consolidated to approximately 86.
System Under Putin:
Following his rise to power, there was a significant reduction in local power at the national level. The Federation Council continues to represent local interests with:
Two representatives from each region — one chosen by the regional legislature and one by the governor.
Political Dynamics:
From 2004 to 2012, governors were directly appointed by Putin as part of power consolidation.
By 2013, with strengthened control over the United Russia party, governors were allowed to be elected by the populace.
Despite this, the political environment remains characterized as competitive authoritarianism, indicating limited genuine democratic competition and substantial control by Putin.
Conclusion
The Russian legislative landscape, shaped by a mix of institutional powers, election reforms, and political strategies, reflects a consolidation of authority under President Putin while providing a façade of democratic processes.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing Russia's current political structure and the challenges facing its democratic development.