Module 2.1-2.2
MODULE 2 |
FUNDAMENTAL MORAL THEOLOGY |
MORALITY AND RELIGION |
Christian Vocation
Values of Kingdom of God
Moral Theology
Christian Ethics
International Theological Commission, In Search of a Universal Ethic: A New Look at Natural Law, 20 May 2009:
“39. Every human being who attains self-awareness and responsibility experiences an interior call to do good. He discovers that he is fundamentally a moral being, capable of perceiving and of expressing the call that, as we have seen, is found within all cultures: “One must do good and avoid evil”…
ITC made this because of moral relativism/skepticism
Relationship between morality and religion
“Religious faith brings to morality a depth, intensity, and urgency by situating it in relation to the person’s fundamental response to God who calls… Religious faith, therefore, challenges individuals to stretch their horizons of meaning, to seek more and become more.” (Astorga, Catholic Moral Theology and Social Ethics: A New Method, 82 and 83)
Human Person ←→ God
Response to transcendent being (Human Call)
Religion can add depth, intensity, and urgency
To be ultimately loving, righteous persons
Types of Morality
Objective Morality → Actions → Right or Wrong
Subjective Morality → Actor → Good or Bad (Sinful)
Sources of Catholic Moral Tradition
Scripture
Written Form
Decalogue/10 Commandments
Tradition
Non-written form/Oral
Human Experience
World
Magisterium
For the Catholic Church
NATURAL LAW (COCHRAN) |
What is natural law?
Two premises:
Ontological
World & Relationship has order → precedes existence
There’s an objective moral order of right and wrong that’s not of human origin and can be expressed in ethical norms to which humans area accountable
Epistemological
Humans have reason → capable of discovering the order
Humans can know through their own with the use of reason alone the demands of this objective moral order
Various NL traditions
Thomistic NL tradition
Most robust among Christian theories
Non-Christian in origin
“What I ought to do?” → “What is natural?”
Humans have basic natural inclinations
Self-preservation → eating, resting
Reproduction → perpetuation of human species
Sociability → relationships
Knowledge → education
Basic human inclinations aligned to survival and flourishing
Natural?
“Natural” = does not require supernatural revelation/faith (God)
“Natural” ≠ imposed, but = “given”
Christian adaptation (Thomas Aquinas)
NL tradition started from the Greek Stoic Philosophy
NL as participation in God’s Eternal Law ≠ divinely imposed.
God’s Eternal Law → God’s Governance (how God would direct the World and the ways human community according to a plan conceived in God’s wisdom and love)
Divine Revelation → Needed to guide
NL is rational direction of life (self-preservation, goods shared with animals, and goods proper to our own nature)
Like Co-creators (OT Vocation)
Human finitude (Limited/Finite) → divine revelation, ≠ necessity of faith
4th-10th commandments are matters of natural law
Recognizes complexity of life
NL aligned to human good & flourishing
Rational direction of life
Sin → unnatural → harms our relationship with others and God
Importance
Supports moral realism (vs. moral relativism)
Don’t throw scripture and rely on reason (Natural Law)
Springboard for dialogue with other cultures, religious beliefs, and peoples. (Pluralistic Society)
Recognizes complexity of moral life.
Clarification and nuances
Two possible ways to proceed with NL: pluralist and universalist (E.g. informed consent)
Tension is not necessarily bad
Pluralist → Multiple cultural → allow some variations
Universalist → one standard across → device specific norms
Challenge: balancing act → individual exercise of practical wisdom (prudence) in pursuing eudaimonia in the context of a teleological view of the human person.
“Telus” → goal
Goal-oriented view