Functionalist no2
Functionalists see education as a positive institution that maintains social order and prepares individuals for the workplace. Education is based on meritocracy and serves the needs of the economy and promoting social solidarity.
Durkheim: Social solidarity and specialist skills
Education creates a sense of belonging and shared norms/values-
Schools teach shared norms and values so they can live peacefully within a society
The curriculum- History helps them develop a shared sense of identity
School anthem can reinforce unity
Social solidarity- Schools are a society- They teach cooperation, discipline and commitment to the wider community
Education teaches specialist skills for a complex division of labour (engineers/ doctors)
In a complex society, individuals have to learn a range of skills to perform specific roles in the division of labour
Therefore, the school system teaches the general education (basic maths and English) and specialist skills (vocational or technical) needed for economic or social functions
Strengths-
Durkheim focus on the importance of social cohesion highlights how education helps to unify a diverse society
His view on specialist skills reflects the importance of schools in preparing students for modern economies
Criticisms-
Marxists argue that Durkheim overlooks how the education system reinforces class inequalities benefiting the elite
Feminists point out Durkheim ignores how schools often reinforce gender roles and patriarchy
Education dosen’t always promote solidarity but instead creates division
Parsons: Bridge between family and society
Acts as bridge because in the family you get treated as an individual and in school and society your treated by universal standards
Believed education operates on a meritocratic basis
Everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed and success is based on ability and effort and not class, gender or background
School rewards those who work hard and perform well- reflecting the values of wider society and capitalism
Exam results determine who goes to the best university therefore, who gets the best job
Education helps to maintain a value consensus- Shared norms and values needed for a stable society
Parsons believed the two main values promoted by a society are achievement and equality of opportunity
Education helps to match individuals to roles in society
Strengths
Helps to explain how individuals are prepared for impersonal rules of modern society
Recognises the importance of schools in promoting shared norms and values
Reflects how schools and workplaces operate with rules and standards
Criticisms-
Marxists disagree that society is meritocratic- Argue schools reinforce class inequality and serve interests of capitalism
Feminists say education dosen’t offer equal opportunity- Gender roles are reinforced in subject choices and expectations
Cultural capital, race and class can affect success
Davis and Moore: Role allocation
Role allocation
Education is a mechanism for selecting and allocating individuals into the most appropriate roles in society
Does this by assessing talents, skills and efforts
Most able and hardworking are sorted into the most functionally important jobs (doctors) which offer higher rewards
Inequality is necessary
Argue that social inequality is functional and necessary
Some jobs are more important to the functioning of society (Surgeons vs Baristas)
Require more skill and training therefore, offer a better reward
Meritocracy reinforced
Believe education was meritocratic- Positions are earned through ability and effort and not background or effort
Schools promote this idea which makes it seem fair
Strengths-
Explains how education prepares individuals for specific jobs and roles
Highlights a link between education, motivation and economic needs
Criticisms-
Marxists argue that this is a myth as inequality is based on social class and capital not meritocracy
Feminists say that gender inequality in the job market means its not fair or meritocratic
Evaluation of functionalist view
Strengths
Highlights the importance of education in maintaining social cohesion
Explains how schools match people to jobs and prepare them for the wider society
Criticisms
Marxists- Education legitimates inequality
Feminists- Education reinforces patriarchal values- gender roles still exists in school
Not all students succeed despite equal opportunities so meritocracy is a myth