Cabinet Mission Plan (1946) Notes
Cabinet Mission Plan (1946)
Background
- The Cabinet Mission Plan was a statement by the Cabinet Mission and the Viceroy, Lord Wavell, on May 16, 1946, proposing a framework for India's constitutional future.
- It aimed to address the disagreements between Indian political parties regarding the future of India.
- The mission was dispatched to India in March 1946.
- Members of the Cabinet Mission:
- Lord Penthick-Lawrence, Secretary of State for India
- Sir Stafford Cripps, President of the Board of Trade
- A.V. Alexander, First Lord of Admiralty
- In September 1945, the newly elected Labour government in Britain expressed its intention to facilitate the creation of a constitution for India.
Obstacles
- The Constituent Assembly faced a major challenge: the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League held fundamentally different views on India's future.
- The Muslim League advocated for a separate sovereign state of Pakistan, comprising Muslim-majority provinces.
- The Congress desired a united India.
- The Mission tried to foster an agreement between the Muslim League and the Congress at the Shimla Conference.
- When this failed, the Mission presented its own proposals, known as the Cabinet Mission Plan.
Overview of the Plan
- The Plan is approximately nine pages long, structured around twenty-four points.
- Some sections explain the political context, approach, and rationale behind the proposals.
- Other sections outline the steps to be taken, including the form of elections to the Constituent Assembly and its preliminary functioning, in a quasi-legal style.
- Point 15 is central, outlining the basic form of the future constitution of India, focusing on the federal structure.
- The Plan rejected the Muslim League's demand for a separate state of Pakistan.
- Instead, it proposed an Indian Union encompassing British provinces and Princely States.
- The Plan introduced the concept of grouping/sections, where provinces and princely states could form groups within the Union, possessing a legislature and executive with significant autonomy.
Acceptance and Rejection
- Initially, the Muslim League and the Congress Party accepted the Plan.
- However, the Congress Party soon rejected the 'grouping' aspect, specifically opposing the grouping of provinces based on religion.
- The Muslim League was unwilling to modify any aspect of the Plan, leading to a breakdown in consensus between the Congress and the Muslim League.
- Further reconciliation attempts by the Cabinet Mission were unsuccessful.
- The proceedings of the Constituent Assembly commenced, and an interim government, led by Jawaharlal Nehru, was established.
- The Muslim League declined to participate and initiated 'Direct Action Day,' resulting in widespread violence across the country.
Influence and Significance
- The Plan, also known as the 'State Paper,' significantly influenced the Constituent Assembly's deliberations, especially regarding Nehru's Objective Resolution and federalism.
- The Assembly acknowledged its creation by the Plan and aimed to adhere to its proposals to maintain legal legitimacy and encourage the Muslim League to join the proceedings.
- The Assembly also asserted that its legitimacy stemmed from the people of India, not solely from the Plan.
- The Cabinet Mission Plan is essential for scholarly research on Indian constitutionalism, law, politics, and history, particularly concerning partition and federalism.
- Recent studies emphasize British self-interest in establishing the Cabinet Mission, such as securing Britain's defense interests in India and the Indian Ocean Area.
- Granville Austin argues that the Cabinet Mission's attempt to mediate between the Congress and the Muslim League was 'foredoomed to failure'.
British Prime Minister Attlee's Statement
- On March 15th, Mr. Attlee stated the mission's intention to help India attain freedom as speedily and fully as possible.
- The decision regarding the form of government was for India to make.
- He expressed hope that India would remain within the British Commonwealth, but emphasized it must be by India's own free will.
- He acknowledged India's right to independence and pledged to help make the transition smooth and easy.
Mission's Efforts and Outcomes
- The Cabinet Ministers and the Viceroy worked to assist the two main political parties in reaching an agreement on the unity or division of India.
- Prolonged discussions in New Delhi led to a conference at Simla.
- Both parties made considerable concessions, but ultimately, they couldn't bridge the gap.
- The mission felt obligated to propose the best possible arrangements for setting up the new constitution.
Recommendations
- Immediate arrangements should be made for Indians to decide on the future constitution of India.
- An Interim Government should be set up to carry on the administration of British India until the new constitution is established.
- The aim was to be just to all sections of the people and recommend a solution that would lead to a practicable way of governing India, providing a sound basis for defense and opportunity for social, political, and economic progress.
Considerations Regarding Partition
- The mission examined the possibility of a partition of India due to the genuine anxiety of Muslims about being subjected to a perpetual Hindu-majority rule.
- This feeling was widespread among Muslims and couldn't be allayed by paper safeguards.
- Internal peace in India required measures that would assure Muslims control in matters vital to their culture, religion, and economic interests.
- The mission examined the question of a separate and fully independent sovereign State of Pakistan as claimed by the Muslim League, comprising areas in the North-West and North-East.
- The Muslim League was prepared to consider adjustments of boundaries later but insisted that the principle of Pakistan should first be acknowledged.
- The argument for Pakistan was based on the right of the Muslim majority to decide their government and the necessity to include areas with Muslim minorities to make Pakistan workable.
Problems with the Pakistan Proposal
- The size of non-Muslim minorities in a Pakistan comprising the six provinces would be very considerable.
- The Muslim minorities in the remainder of British India numbered some 20 million dispersed among a total population of 188 million.
- Creating a separate sovereign State of Pakistan would not solve the communal minority problem.
- There was no justification for including non-Muslim areas within Pakistan.
- Every argument for Pakistan could be used for excluding non-Muslim areas from Pakistan.
- A smaller sovereign Pakistan confined to Muslim-majority areas was considered impracticable by the Muslim League.
- It would entail the exclusion of several areas, including parts of Punjab, Assam, and Western Bengal, including Calcutta.
- Any solution involving a radical partition of the Punjab and Bengal would be contrary to the wishes and interests of a large proportion of the inhabitants.
- Bengal and the Punjab had a common language and a long history and tradition.
- Division of the Punjab would divide the Sikhs, leaving substantial bodies on both sides of the boundary.
- Neither a larger nor a smaller sovereign State of Pakistan would provide an acceptable solution for the communal problem.
Administrative, Economic, and Military Considerations
- The transportation, postal, and telegraph systems of India were established on the basis of a united India, and disintegrating them would gravely injure both parts.
- A united defense was even more critical.
- The Indian Armed Forces were built up as a whole for the defense of India, and breaking them in two would inflict a deadly blow on their traditions and efficiency.
- The Indian Navy and Indian Air Force would become much less effective.
- The two sections of the suggested Pakistan contained the two most vulnerable frontiers in India, and the area of Pakistan would be insufficient for successful defense in depth.
- Indian States would find it more difficult to associate themselves with a divided British India.
- The two halves of the proposed Pakistan State were separated by approximately seven hundred miles, and communications between them would depend on the goodwill of Hindustan.
Decision Against Separate Sovereign States
- The British Government was advised against handing over power to two entirely separate sovereign states.
- The real Muslim apprehensions that their culture and political and social life might become submerged in a purely unitary India were acknowledged.
- The Congress put forward a scheme under which Provinces would have full autonomy subject only to a minimum of Central subjects, such as Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Communications.
- Provinces could cede optional subjects to the Centre for economic and administrative planning.
Disadvantages of the Congress Scheme
- Such a scheme would present considerable constitutional disadvantages and anomalies.
- It would be difficult to work a Central Executive and Legislature in which some Ministers were responsible to the whole of India, while others were responsible only to those Provinces which had elected to act together in respect of optional subjects.
- This difficulty would be accentuated in the Central Legislature, where it would be necessary to exclude certain members from speaking and voting when subjects with which their Provinces were not concerned were under discussion.
- It would not be fair to deny to other Provinces, which did not desire to take the optional subjects at the Centre, the right to form themselves into a group for a similar purpose.
- This would be no more than the exercise of their autonomous powers in a particular way.
Relationship of Indian States to British India
- With the attainment of independence by British India, the relationship between the Rulers of the States and the British Crown would no longer be possible.
- Paramountcy could neither be retained by the British Crown nor transferred to the new Government.
- The States were ready and willing to cooperate in the new development of India.
- The precise form of their cooperation would be a matter for negotiation during the building up of the new constitutional structure, and it would not necessarily be identical for all the States.
Recommended Solution
- The recommended solution would be just to the essential claims of all parties and most likely to bring about a stable and practicable form of constitution for All-India.
Basic Form of the Constitution
- There should be a Union of India, embracing both British India and the States, which should deal with Foreign Affairs, Defence, and Communications and have the powers necessary to raise the finances required for these subjects.
- The Union should have an Executive and a Legislature constituted from British Indian and States representatives. Any question raising a major communal issue in the Legislature should require for its decision a majority of the representatives present and voting of each of the two major communities as well as a majority of all the members present and voting.
- All subjects other than the Union subjects and all residuary powers should vest in the Provinces.
- The States will retain all subjects and powers other than those ceded to the Union.
- Provinces should be free to form Groups with executives and legislatures, and each Group could determine the Provincial subjects to be taken in common.
- The constitutions of the Union and of the Groups should contain a provision whereby any Province could, by a majority vote of its Legislative Assembly, call for a reconsideration of the terms of the constitution after an initial period of 10 years and at 10 yearly intervals thereafter.
Constitution-Making Machinery
- The object was not to lay out the details of a constitution but to set in motion the machinery whereby a constitution could be settled by Indians for Indians.
- It was necessary to make recommendations as to the broad basis of the future constitution to get the two major communities to join in setting up the constitution-making machinery.
- The constitution-making machinery should be brought into being forthwith to enable a new constitution to be worked out.
Representation
The first problem was to obtain as broad-based and accurate a representation of the whole population as possible.
The most satisfactory method would be by election based on adult franchise, but this would lead to an unacceptable delay.
The only practicable course was to utilize the recently elected Provincial Legislative Assemblies as the electing bodies.
The numerical strengths of the Provincial Legislative Assemblies do not bear the same proportion to the total population in each Province.
The strengths of the several communities in each Provincial Legislative Assembly are not in proportion to their numbers in the Province due to the weightage given to minorities by the Communal Award.
The fairest and most practicable plan would be:
- To allot to each Province a total number of seats proportional to its population, roughly in the ratio of one to a million, as the nearest substitute for representation by adult suffrage.
- To divide this provincial allocation of seats between the main communities in each Province in proportion to their population.
- To provide that the representatives allotted to each community in a Province shall be elected by the members of that community in its Legislative Assembly.
For these purposes, it is sufficient to recognize only three main communities in India: General, Muslim, and Sikh.
Arrangements were made to give smaller minorities full representation on all matters of special interest to them.
Election of Representatives
Each Provincial Legislative Assembly would elect representatives, with each part of the Legislative Assembly (General, Muslim, or Sikh) electing its own representatives by proportional representation with the single transferable vote.
Note: Representation would be added for Chief Commissioners’ Provinces and British Baluchistan.
The States would be given appropriate representation in the final Constituent Assembly, based on calculations adopted for British India.
Preliminary Meeting and Sections
- A preliminary meeting would be held to decide the general order of business, elect officers, and set up an Advisory Committee on the rights of citizens, minorities, and tribal and excluded areas.
- The provincial representatives would divide into three sections (A, B, and C).
- These sections would settle the Provincial Constitutions for the Provinces included in each section and decide whether any group constitution should be set up and with what provincial subjects the group should deal.
- Provinces would have the power to opt out of the groups.
- The representatives of the sections and the Indian States would reassemble to settle the Union constitution.
Voting and Communal Issues
- In the Union Constituent Assembly, resolutions varying the provisions of paragraph 15 or raising any major communal issue would require a majority of the representatives present and voting of each of the two major communities.
- The Chairman of the Assembly would decide which resolutions raise major communal issues and consult the Federal Court if requested by a majority of the representatives of either of the major communities.
Opting Out of Groups
- After the new constitutional arrangements have come into operation, any Province could elect to come out of any group in which it has been placed. This decision would be taken by the Legislature of the Province after the first general election under the new constitution.
Advisory Committee
- The Advisory Committee on the rights of citizens, minorities, and tribal and excluded areas would contain full representation of the interests affected.
- Their function would be to report to the Union Constituent Assembly upon the list of Fundamental Rights, the clauses for the protection of minorities, and a scheme for the administration of the tribal and excluded areas and to advise whether these rights should be incorporated in the Provincial, Group, or Union constitution.
Next Steps
- The Viceroy would request the Provincial Legislatures to proceed with the election of their representatives and the States to set up a Negotiating Committee.
- The process of constitution-making should proceed as rapidly as possible.
- A treaty would be negotiated between the Union Constituent Assembly and the United Kingdom to provide for certain matters arising out of the transfer of power.
Interim Government
- It was of the greatest importance to set up an interim Government having the support of the major political parties.
- Maximum cooperation was essential during the interim period.
- Besides day-to-day administration, there was the danger of famine, decisions in matters of post-war development, and important international conferences.
- A Government having popular support was necessary for all these purposes.
- The Viceroy had started discussions to form an interim Government in which all the portfolios, including that of War Member, would be held by Indian leaders having the full confidence of the people.
- The British Government would give the fullest measure of cooperation to the Government in its tasks of administration and in bringing about as rapid and smooth a transition as possible.
Appeal to the Leaders and People of India
- The leaders and people of India had the opportunity of complete independence.
- Despite the efforts made, it had not been possible for the Indian people to agree upon the method of framing the new constitution.
- The proposals were presented in the hope that they would enable India to attain independence in the shortest time and with the least danger of internal disturbance and conflict.
- Statesmanship demanded mutual accommodation.
- The alternative to acceptance of these proposals would be a grave danger of violence, chaos, and even civil war.
- The proposals were offered in the spirit of accommodation and goodwill.
- All were appealed to extend their vision beyond their own community or interest to the interests of the whole four hundred millions of the Indian people.
- It was hoped that the new independent India might choose to be a member of the British Commonwealth but these were matters for India's own free choice.
- Whatever the choice, a future of ever-increasing prosperity was envisioned.