Evidence — Presentation of Evidence
Presentation of Evidence
Overview of rules involving the presentation of evidence in trials.
Each rule is distinct, focusing on individual aspects of evidence presentation.
Witnesses
Types of witnesses: Lay witnesses (regular people) and expert witnesses.
Who Can Be a Witness?
Anyone with personal knowledge can testify.
Personal Knowledge = Lay witness testimony; no legal conclusions can be drawn, only perceptions.
Examples of perceptions: Speed of a car, time estimation based on experience.
Oath or Affirmation
Witnesses can be required to take an oath/affirmation to testify truthfully.
Eligibility
Judges and jurors cannot testify as witnesses in trials except for improper conduct within the jury room.
Children can be witnesses if they understand the difference between truth and lies.
Expert Witnesses
An expert witness must be qualified to testify and provide opinion based on specialized knowledge.
Laying Foundation
Prove qualifications through education, experience, publications, etc. (CV, resume, awards).
Expert Opinion
Can give opinions based on both current and outside materials.
Can provide conclusions except concerning the mental state of a defendant in criminal cases.
Key Exception in Criminal Cases:
Expert witnesses cannot give opinions about the defendant's mental state as it relates to the elements of a crime.
Focus should be on intent and mental capacity in such situations.
Scope of Expertise
An expert's testimony is limited to the subject matter they're recognized as an expert in.
Rules While Witness is on Stand
Control of Witnesses
The court must maintain reasonable control to prevent wasting time or embarrassing witnesses.
Leading Questions
Generally prohibited during direct examination.
Allowed during cross-examinations or in specific situations (e.g., hostile witnesses, young/shy witnesses, refreshing memory).
Refreshing Memory
Documents/pictures can be shown to refresh a witness's memory but are not read into evidence.
Different from recorded recollection, which is a hearsay exception.
Roles of Judge and Jury
Judge's Role
Determines rules of law (admissibility of evidence).
Jury's Role
Decides questions of fact and the weight of evidence.
Exclusion of Witnesses
Witnesses generally cannot hear testimonies of other witnesses except under certain circumstances (party status, statutory allowances).
Objections and Offers of Proof
Objection:
Pointing out issues with admissible evidence; must be timely and specify grounds.
Offer of Proof:
Presented when evidence is excluded; aims to demonstrate why evidence should have been admitted for potential appeal.
Burden of Persuasion and Production
Burden of Production: Initial burden on the plaintiff or prosecution to prove each element of a claim.
Burden of Persuasion:
In civil cases, requires proof by the preponderance of evidence (more than 50%).
In criminal cases, proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Rebuttable Presumption:
Once the plaintiff/prosecution meets their burden, it creates a presumption that can be rebutted by the defense.
Conclusive Presumption:
Where no contrary evidence can be introduced, often linked to statutory rules.
Impeachment
Focused on witnesses and their credibility.
Types of Impeachment Questions:
Regular impeachment targets contradictions or inconsistencies in testimony.
Impeaching witness character focuses on past bad acts or criminal convictions.
Rules on Prior Convictions:
Convictions can be admitted depending on the nature of the crime (felony vs. honesty-related crimes).
Prior bad acts cannot be used to impeach unless they pertain to truthfulness.
Collateral Matters: Witnesses cannot be impeached over irrelevant matters not tied to their testimony.
Hearsay Exception:
If a statement is both impeachable and a hearsay exception, it may be used for both purposes.
Conclusion
Understand these rules distinctly and practice application in hypothetical scenarios to effectively answer trial-related questions.