Evidence — Presentation of Evidence

Presentation of Evidence

  • Overview of rules involving the presentation of evidence in trials.

  • Each rule is distinct, focusing on individual aspects of evidence presentation.

Witnesses

  • Types of witnesses: Lay witnesses (regular people) and expert witnesses.

  • Who Can Be a Witness?

    • Anyone with personal knowledge can testify.

    • Personal Knowledge = Lay witness testimony; no legal conclusions can be drawn, only perceptions.

    • Examples of perceptions: Speed of a car, time estimation based on experience.

  • Oath or Affirmation

    • Witnesses can be required to take an oath/affirmation to testify truthfully.

  • Eligibility

    • Judges and jurors cannot testify as witnesses in trials except for improper conduct within the jury room.

    • Children can be witnesses if they understand the difference between truth and lies.

Expert Witnesses

  • An expert witness must be qualified to testify and provide opinion based on specialized knowledge.

  • Laying Foundation

    • Prove qualifications through education, experience, publications, etc. (CV, resume, awards).

  • Expert Opinion

    • Can give opinions based on both current and outside materials.

    • Can provide conclusions except concerning the mental state of a defendant in criminal cases.

  • Key Exception in Criminal Cases:

    • Expert witnesses cannot give opinions about the defendant's mental state as it relates to the elements of a crime.

    • Focus should be on intent and mental capacity in such situations.

  • Scope of Expertise

    • An expert's testimony is limited to the subject matter they're recognized as an expert in.

Rules While Witness is on Stand

  • Control of Witnesses

    • The court must maintain reasonable control to prevent wasting time or embarrassing witnesses.

  • Leading Questions

    • Generally prohibited during direct examination.

    • Allowed during cross-examinations or in specific situations (e.g., hostile witnesses, young/shy witnesses, refreshing memory).

  • Refreshing Memory

    • Documents/pictures can be shown to refresh a witness's memory but are not read into evidence.

    • Different from recorded recollection, which is a hearsay exception.

Roles of Judge and Jury

  • Judge's Role

    • Determines rules of law (admissibility of evidence).

  • Jury's Role

    • Decides questions of fact and the weight of evidence.

  • Exclusion of Witnesses

    • Witnesses generally cannot hear testimonies of other witnesses except under certain circumstances (party status, statutory allowances).

Objections and Offers of Proof

  • Objection:

    • Pointing out issues with admissible evidence; must be timely and specify grounds.

  • Offer of Proof:

    • Presented when evidence is excluded; aims to demonstrate why evidence should have been admitted for potential appeal.

Burden of Persuasion and Production

  • Burden of Production: Initial burden on the plaintiff or prosecution to prove each element of a claim.

  • Burden of Persuasion:

    • In civil cases, requires proof by the preponderance of evidence (more than 50%).

    • In criminal cases, proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Rebuttable Presumption:

    • Once the plaintiff/prosecution meets their burden, it creates a presumption that can be rebutted by the defense.

  • Conclusive Presumption:

    • Where no contrary evidence can be introduced, often linked to statutory rules.

Impeachment

  • Focused on witnesses and their credibility.

  • Types of Impeachment Questions:

    • Regular impeachment targets contradictions or inconsistencies in testimony.

    • Impeaching witness character focuses on past bad acts or criminal convictions.

  • Rules on Prior Convictions:

    • Convictions can be admitted depending on the nature of the crime (felony vs. honesty-related crimes).

    • Prior bad acts cannot be used to impeach unless they pertain to truthfulness.

  • Collateral Matters: Witnesses cannot be impeached over irrelevant matters not tied to their testimony.

  • Hearsay Exception:

    • If a statement is both impeachable and a hearsay exception, it may be used for both purposes.

Conclusion

  • Understand these rules distinctly and practice application in hypothetical scenarios to effectively answer trial-related questions.