Challenges - Bultmann:
Rudolf Bultmann:
Agreed that Kerygma is an announcement, not a doctrine/treaching.
No interest in trying to prove a unified Kerygma like Dodd.
Acts contain myths that are irrelevant to the modern age.
Must distinguish between myth and Kerygma
This results in an existential decision of faith.
Adapting the Christian message:
Three options for acts:
Believe them literally - ignore the modern world.
Cut out the myths - try and construct faith from what remains.
Find the Kerygma - discover the truth about existence expressed through the mythological language.
Two mythologies in the NT:
Jewish apocalyptism - the current era will be replaced by the end of the world.
Gnosticism - Each person is a spark of life trapped in the world. A being of light is sent by God to liberate our sparks.
Both types of myth are hard to take literally.
We must find the Kerygma within.
It cannot be understood without cultural expression.
Kerygma of the NT:
For Bultmann, the Kerygma is:
We are not masters of the world
Our powers are finite
There is a transcendent power
We can be forgiven
We cannot control life
It is possible to find a spirit of openness in the future.
The Kerygma elicits an emotional response
A decision is required
Bultmann:
Kerygma is not myth - it is communicated through myth.
No ‘pure’ Kerygma exists outside of culture.
Power was felt when people heard rhe message
It is still powerful now.
“When they heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and to the other Apostles, “brothers what should we do?” - Acts 2:37
Demands a faith response.
Realised eschatology.
‘End time.’ Related to real judgement by a higher power now.
Kerygma:
The exact compositional elements do not matter.
It cannot be explained through science.
It is never complete.
It is not doctrinal.
It cannot be proven historically
It is not myth - it is heard through myth.