Jurisdiction and Civil Procedure Quick Notes

Federal Courts Overview

  • Dual court system: federal and state courts exist side by side.
  • Federal structure: US Supreme Court (top), US district courts (trial courts; ~9090 nationwide; Florida has 33 districts), US Courts of Appeals (11 circuits; DC Circuit; Federal Circuit handles patents/trademarks).
  • Appellate path: district court → US Court of Appeals → US Supreme Court (discretionary review).
  • State structure (example: Florida): trial courts (county court; circuit court), appellate courts, state supreme court; small claims and specialized courts exist.

Jurisdiction Basics

  • Jurisdiction types:
    • Subject matter jurisdiction: which court can hear a type of case (federal vs state; exclusive vs concurrent).
    • Personal jurisdiction (in personam): over the defendant; can be obtained via service or long-arm statutes.
    • In rem jurisdiction: over property located in the forum state.
  • “Long-arm” statutes: allow a state to exercise personal jurisdiction over non-residents who engage in certain activities within the state.
  • Forum and choice-of-law: contract clauses can dictate where suit is filed and which law applies.

Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction

  • Certain cases must be filed in federal court:
    • Federal criminal prosecutions.
    • Bankruptcy cases.
    • Antitrust cases.
    • Patent and trademark cases.
    • Suits against the US government.
    • Maritime cases (in many scenarios).
  • When exclusive, state courts cannot hear these matters.

Concurrent Jurisdiction: Federal Question and Diversity

  • Federal question jurisdiction: arises from federal law or US Constitution; can be filed in either state or federal court.
    • If both federal and state issues exist, federal procedural law applies in federal court; state substantive law may apply for state-law issues.
  • Diversity of citizenship: can also allow filing in federal court when not a federal question.
    • Requirements: complete diversity (all plaintiffs are from different states than all defendants) and amount in controversy > 75,00075{,}000.
    • If diversity exists, defendants can sometimes remove a case from state to federal court.
  • Amount in controversy threshold in diversity cases is 75,00075{,}000 (relevant for exam purposes).

Forum, Forum Shopping, and Choice of Law in Contracts

  • Forum selection clause: directs where lawsuits must be filed (often a specific state/court).
  • Choice of law clause: determines which state's law governs the contract.
  • Practical effect: can simplify litigation and reduce cross-border complexity (e.g., Florida forum + Florida law for contracts with out-of-state parties).

In Rem vs Personal Jurisdiction in Action

  • In rem: sue over real property located in the forum; you may obtain a judgment related to the property even if the defendant is not present.
  • Personal jurisdiction (in personam): requires valid service and a basis (e.g., long-arm statute) to bring a non-resident defendants into the forum.

Choice of Law and Procedure in Federal vs State Courts

  • When federal question is involved: federal law governs the federal issue; state law may govern other issues.
  • When diversity of citizenship governs: federal court applies state substantive law (e.g., contract law of the forum state or chosen state) and federal procedural law.
  • Procedural law is generally federal in federal court; substantive law is state law for state issues.
  • If a case transfers between courts, the applicable law rules depend on the type of issue (procedural vs substantive) and on forum selection/choice-of-law provisions.

Appeals and Judicial Process Notes

  • Appellate review typically involves three judges; most cases start at the appellate level after a trial court decision.
  • In Florida, appellate courts can issue a per curiam affirmance (PCA) with no written opinion; this can limit the opportunity for review unless the party seeks further review.
  • Prejudicial error: appellate courts overturn trial court decisions only if there was a significant error that would have changed the outcome.
  • Trial court follows applicable higher court precedents; federal courts follow US Supreme Court decisions; state courts follow state supreme court decisions, plus federal law where applicable.

Practical Litigation Considerations

  • Before filing, attempt to resolve disputes to avoid litigation; contracts should incentivize quick resolution where possible.
  • Choose forums and laws wisely in contracts to reduce uncertainty and travel costs.
  • Reading and understanding terms in contracts is crucial; forum and choice-of-law clauses can determine exposure and cost.
  • In business disputes, consider the leverage of bargaining power and potential impact on relationships when deciding whether to sue or seek alternative dispute resolution.

Quick Reference Constants

  • Amount in controversy for diversity: 75,00075{,}000.
  • Small claims thresholds (varies by jurisdiction; example: Florida small claims up to 8,0008{,}000).
  • Number of federal circuits: 1111 (plus DC and Federal Circuit for patents; some categorization adds up to 12–13 in specific contexts).
  • Typical timelines: trial to appellate can span multiple years depending on complexity and caseload.

Key Concepts to Remember

  • Federal exclusive jurisdiction: criminal, bankruptcy, antitrust, patent/trademark, US government suits.
  • Concurrent jurisdiction: federal question or diversity; eligibility for filing in either court; removal possible under certain conditions.
  • Diversity requirements: complete diversity + amount in controversy > 75,00075{,}000.
  • Choice of forum vs. choice of law crucial in contracts; long-arm statutes enable service on out-of-state defendants.
  • Procedural vs. substantive law in federal vs. state courts; federal procedure generally follows federal rules; state procedure follows state rules; substantive law follows the applicable substantive rules (often state law for state issues).