Overview of a controversial aspect of Brexit: the Ireland-Northern Ireland Protocol.
Aims to protect the Belfast Agreement (1998).
Established political stability post-conflict (1969-1998).
Endorsed by referenda in Northern Ireland and Ireland (May 1998).
Flexible notions of citizenship and identity facilitated cooperation.
Brexit proposed an economic border between UK and EU;
Protocol established the border in the Irish Sea with efforts to avoid a hard border.
Focus on consent principle from the Belfast Agreement.
Consent principle acknowledges:
Northern Ireland's status as part of the UK.
Potential for a united Ireland upon majority wish.
Critics claim the economic border undermines the consent principle and violates the Act of Union (1800).
Northern Ireland Court of Appeal ruled the Protocol consistent with the consent principle.
Strand One: Internal arrangements in Northern Ireland.
Strand Two: North/South cooperation.
Strand Three: East-West relations between Ireland and Britain.
Northern Ireland institutions must comply with both UK and EU law.
UK Withdrawal Act 2018 incorporated the Protocol into UK law.
Northern Ireland Assembly can modify retained EU law, except where restricted by the UK government.
EU law has supremacy under the Protocol, affecting legal decisions in Northern Ireland.
Analysis of Re Allister’s Application highlights:
Issue of conflict between constitutional statutes: Protocol (via Withdrawal Act) vs. Act of Union.
Importance of consent principle.
Court maintained that parliamentary sovereignty is intact and the Protocol does not violate constitutional status.
Protocol addresses rights, safeguards, and equality per Belfast Agreement.
Economic border implications analyzed; democratic consent required in 2024 regarding the Protocol.
Protocol reflects ongoing constitutional engineering in Northern Ireland.
Necessity for recognizing complexities of Northern Ireland's governance.
Possible implications for future of Irish unification discussions.