LF 5.0
Introduction to Syntax
Syntax is a component of mental grammar that deals with sentence construction.
It relates to how sentences and phrases can be constructed from smaller phrases and words.
Native speakers instinctively know which combinations of words form valid sentences in their language due to their understanding of syntactic combinations.
Syntax also refers to a subfield of linguistics that studies this aspect of grammar.
Importance of Syntax
Sentence construction is complex; not all combinations of words create valid sentences.
Understanding which combinations of words form sentences and which do not is a key focus for syntacticians.
Questions explored in syntax include:
What factors influence permissible word combinations?
How do languages compare regarding sentence structure?
Contents Overview
5.1 Basic Ideas of Syntax
Introduces linguistic expressions, grammaticality, and independent syntactic properties.
5.2 Syntactic Properties
Discusses word order restrictions and co-occurrence requirements of expressions, including arguments and adjuncts.
5.3 Syntactic Constituency
Introduces syntactic constituents and general constituency tests.
5.4 Syntactic Categories
Explains syntactic categories and distribution, introducing major syntactic categories in English.
5.5 Constructing a Grammar
Guides the reader in constructing a simple descriptive grammar of English.
5.6 Practice
Provides exercises, discussion questions, activities, and further readings related to syntax.
Basic Ideas of Syntax
(Un)Grammaticality
Syntax focuses on how words and phrases combine into larger structures.
Linguistic expressions can be single words or phrases, each with form, meaning, and syntactic properties.
Successful combinations of words lead to grammatical sentences; unsuccessful ones lead to ungrammatical strings.
Example:
Grammatical: "Sally likes Bob."
Ungrammatical: "*Likes Bob Sally."
A grammaticality judgment reflects a speaker’s mental grammar rather than prescriptive rules.
Example of a syntactically acceptable but prescriptively incorrect sentence: "We are going to quickly wrap up this paragraph..."
Relationship between Syntax and Semantics
Syntax and semantics intersect since sentence assembly communicates complex meanings.
Example comparison:
"Sally likes Bob."
"Bob likes Sally."
Although both sentences use the same words, the different syntactic arrangements lead to different meanings.
Principle of Compositionality: The meaning depends on the combination of expressions, leading to infinite new sentences despite a finite lexicon.
Independence of Syntax and Semantics
Syntax can produce grammatical sentences with bizarre meanings and non-sentences that convey understandable meanings.
Example of a grammatical but nonsensical sentence by Chomsky: "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."
Comparison:
Syntactically valid: "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."
Syntactically invalid: "*Green sleep colorless furiously ideas."
It is also clear that meanings do not determine syntactic properties.
Syntactic Behavior Variation
Example verbs:
"Sally ate an apple."
"Sally devoured an apple."
But:
"Sally ate."
"*Sally devoured."
Possessive pronouns example:
"This dog is mine." (grammatical)
"*This dog is my." (ungrammatical)
Different languages exhibit distinct syntactic properties despite similar meanings.
Example in English: "Ana has a dog."
Equivalent in Serbo-Croatian exhibits different syntactic requirements.
Anglicized: "*Ana has dog."
Serbo-Croatian allows: "Ana ima psa."
Conclusion: Syntactic rules are not governed solely by meanings and are influenced by the innate rules of the language.