Natural Environment Teaching (NET) Notes
Learning Stages & Instructional Outcomes
- 4 sequential stages of learning/teaching in ABA
- Acquisition – initial learning of a skill
- Fluency – increasing speed/accuracy
- Discrimination – differentiating when/where to use the skill
- Generalization – using the skill across people, settings, & stimuli
- Purpose of generalization
- Promote use of skills in everyday life & environments
- Establish stimulus control so natural cues evoke target behaviors
- Increase adaptive performance outside contrived settings
Natural Environment Teaching (NET) – Core Ideas
- ABA‐based instruction delivered in real‐life settings rather than at a table or single workstation
- Teacher/RBT capitalizes on naturally occurring situations & reinforcers
- Maintains alignment with client’s program book (goals/objectives remain the same)
- Often necessary for skills that are hard to replicate in a clinic (e.g., toothbrushing in an actual bathroom)
- Can include aids from clinic (token boards, visuals) to scaffold learning in vivo
Skills Especially Suited for NET
- Functional communication (manding/tacting)
- Social interaction & play skills
- Self-care routines (toothbrushing, bathing)
- Homemaking / daily living (laundry, cooking)
- Community navigation (shopping, money use)
- Gross-motor play (swinging, sliding, running)
Incidental Teaching – Overarching NET Strategy
- Definition: Systematically using unplanned, naturally occurring opportunities to teach targeted behaviors
- Less pre-structured, more responsive to child’s motivation & environment
- Still data-driven; teacher tracks progress toward IEP/plan goals
MAND-Model Procedure (within Incidental Teaching)
- Teacher observes learner’s interest in an item/activity
- Teacher models the correct language/response (“Push me, please”)
- Learner is prompted/required to imitate or approximate the model
- Natural reinforcer is delivered immediately (swing pushes, access to toy)
Case Study 1 – Beatrice (Early Language Learner)
- Schedule: 20 hrs/week clinic + 20 hrs/week home NET
- Clinic targets: manding, tacting, listener responding
- Home NET capitalizes on outdoor play & pet cat “JoJo”
Original Mand Targets (Partial List)
- “kitty / JoJo”
- “apple”
- “iPad”
- “slide”
- “jump”
- “water”
- “swing”
NET-Generated/Generalized Mands
- “puppy” (generalized from “kitty” with both animals present)
- “bubbles” (contrived by RBT withholding bubbles)
- “banana” (emerged when no apple available)
- “play” (modeled by siblings, reinforced by RBT)
- “push” (needed on swing)
- “go / outside” (context not available in clinic)
- “mud” (incidental teaching exemplar)
Detailed Incidental Teaching Sequence – “Mud”
- Beatrice swinging; discovers puddle → squeals (identify motivation)
- RBT lets her splash a few times (verify durability of reinforcement)
- RBT halts swing just before feet hit puddle; prompts “Say ‘mud’!”
- Learner says “mud” → immediate release into splash (natural reinforcer)
- Skill maintained next day with parents; generalized inside house → spontaneous “mud” mand to RBT
Case Study 2 – Gordon (10-yr-old with ASD)
- Language in short sentences; deficits in waiting & tone with peers
- Intervention mix: 3 individual sessions/week + 2 NET cafeteria/playground sessions
- Key goals: appropriate tone when making requests; waiting turn in games
Cafeteria Incident (Ketchup)
- Gordon (gruff tone): “Pass the ketchup.” → Peer annoyed, refuses
- Potential escalation (peer is naïve; treats Gordon like any other 10-yr-old)
- RBT implements MAND-model
- Gains attention: “Pass the ketchup, please.” (model)
- Gordon protests (“I did ask!”) – shows confusion about tone/ politeness cue
- RBT increases prompt: “Say it like me.”
- Gordon modifies tone; peer passes ketchup (RBT ensures follow-through)
- Outcomes
- Teaches Gordon nuance beyond word usage (prosody, politeness)
- Provides peer with live model on de-escalation, fostering inclusion
Obstacles & Risks in NET
- Privacy & Confidentiality
- Informed consent must specify community/home training
- RBT must know what info can/cannot be shared with teachers, bystanders
- Funding / Reimbursement Constraints (handled by BCBA/agency)
- Safety Concerns
- Client behaviors: aggression, elopement, SIB, false accusations
- Environmental variables: roads, animals, strangers
- Reduced control compared to clinic
- Observer Reactions
- Naïve peers/ public may escalate or interfere
Implementation Tips & Best Practices
- Verify informed consent for each natural setting
- Pre-visit & research the site (traffic, animals, typical crowd, hazards)
- Build a hierarchy of natural settings
- Start with semi-controlled (group room, classroom, home)
- Progress to less structured (park, store) only after mastery & instructional control
- Ensure high baseline accuracy & compliance before NET session
- Bring extra/high-value reinforcers for unexpected challenges
- Rehearse scenarios in clinic or during transit
- Scripts for initiating play, requesting help, polite forms
- Panic signal or escape option for learner
- Plan for worst-case events
- Additional staff or parent present
- Shorter initial durations; clear exit strategy
- Debrief & feed observations back to BCBA → adjust discrete-trial materials or goals
Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications
- Empowering clients: Real-world competence > rote table skills
- Promotes dignity through participation in typical routines (e.g., shopping, park play)
- Balances autonomy with safety; respects least-restrictive environment principles
- Encourages collaboration with families & community while safeguarding confidentiality
Connections to Foundational ABA Principles
- Stimulus Control: NET ensures natural SDs (mud puddle, peer request) evoke correct responses
- Motivating Operations: Uses naturally strong MOs (desire to splash, need for ketchup)
- Generalization & Maintenance: Direct practice across people, settings, stimuli → durable behavior change
- Shaping & Prompt Fading: E.g., RBT escalating prompt from model → “Say it like me” → independent polite request
Key Terminology Quick-Reference
- NET (Natural Environment Teaching): ABA instruction occurring in real-life contexts
- Incidental Teaching: Leveraging naturally occurring events for instruction
- MAND: A request controlled by motivation (e.g., saying “mud” to get splash)
- MAND-Model: Teacher models the desired mand, then prompts imitation
- Stimulus Control: Behavior reliably occurs in presence of the correct cue
- Instructional Control: Learner’s cooperation with instructor; prerequisite for safe NET
Numerical References
- Clinic vs. home hours for Beatrice: 20 + 20 hours/week
- Gordon’s weekly schedule: 3 individual sessions, 2 NET sessions
- Development timeline for Gordon’s language growth: 2 years
Summary Takeaways
- NET bridges clinic gains to life functionality; requires careful planning, strong control, informed consent
- Incidental teaching & MAND-model allow RBTs to seize motivation moments for rapid language/social growth
- Real-world settings reveal nuanced barriers; data from NET guides refinement of discrete-trial programs
- Ethical practice in NET involves safeguarding privacy, ensuring safety, and promoting client dignity at all times