Study Notes on Exploring the Everyday Philosophies of Physical Education Teachers
Introduction
The study focuses on the everyday philosophies of physical education (PE) teachers in secondary schools in the north-west of England, based on semi-structured interviews with 35 PE teachers.
Primary aim: To explore teachers' everyday philosophies of PE from a sociological perspective.
Key findings: Existence of several ideological themes such as sport, health, academic value, education for leisure, and 'sport for all', which contrast sharply with academic conceptions of PE.
Highlights a significant 'theory-practice gap' between philosophical understandings of PE and the actual ideologies adopted by teachers.
Philosophical and Ideological Context
PE philosophy has been dominated by two broad themes since the 1970s:
The 'standard' academic conception, linked to liberal analytical philosophy (Reid, 1996a, 1996b).
The cultural practice-focused conception associated with 'sport education' (Arnold, 1992; Hirst, 1994).
This study hypothesized teachers' philosophies, viewed through a figurational sociological lens, would reflect ideologies rather than abstract philosophies, enabling insights into the socio-genesis of their orientations.
Philosophy, Ideology, and Sociology of Knowledge
There are two main traditions in studying human knowledge (Elias, 1978; Wilterdink, 1977):
Philosophical Tradition: Knowledge as an isolated pursuit of definite truths.
Sociological Tradition: Knowledge as culture-bound and socially determined, thus ideological.
The figurational perspective suggests knowledge exists on a continuum of adequacy and must be understood as a social construct.
Important concepts:
Philosophy: Rational principles underlying knowledge.
Everyday Philosophy: Teachers' views on PE, more ideologically charged than rigorously academic.
Ideology: Viewed as incorporating elements of falsehood and distortion generated by unconscious motivations.
Discourse: The communication methods through which ideologies are articulated and developed, integral to the work of 'doing' ideology, not merely reflecting it.
Methodology
Data Collection: Semi-structured interviews with 35 PE teachers from 17 schools in late June/early July 1998.
Purposive sampling method to select male and female PE teachers from a diverse range of schools in various locations (cities, towns, rural areas).
Sample Overview:
15 males and 20 females, with 15 heads of department (HoD), across various age groups.
Interview structure focused on teachers' philosophies regarding PE, perceptions of the curriculum, and contextual constraints.
Data Analysis: Content analysis of transcribed interviews to identify core themes and clusters of meaning, based on frequency and significance of various ideologies discussed.
Findings: Everyday Philosophies of PE Teachers
Teachers' responses reflected ideological themes: sport, health, education for leisure, and academic value, with additional emphasis on enjoyment.
Enjoyment
Central Theme: Almost universally emphasized, regardless of gender or age of the teacher.
Enjoyment identified as essential for engagement, control, and learning: "Success might just mean enjoyment."
Often viewed as an end in itself or a necessary condition for achieving various outcomes.
Teachers linked enjoyment to greater participation, control, and skill acquisition in PE lessons.
Not commonly seen as a goal in educational discourse outside PE, hints at perception of PE as less serious.
Sport
Majority of teachers emphasized enjoyment in the context of sports: PE inherently linked to competitive sports and enjoyment.
Notably male teachers viewed competition as central to sport, thus paramount in PE ethos.
Skill acquisition seen as a primary focus throughout secondary education, and many teachers sought to restore traditional sport emphasis in PE curricula.
Critique of recreational approaches indicating a desire for traditional standards in PE practices.
Education for Leisure
Increased awareness of changing youth cultures and leisure activities led teachers to adapt PE offerings.
Teachers aimed to make PE enjoyable and relevant, enabling lifelong engagement in sports post-school.
'Sport for All'
Teachers expressed strong commitment to inclusivity, especially in disadvantaged areas, indicating a localism in their 'philosophies'.
Teachers articulated a need for participation, focusing on broader access to various sports rather than elite performance.
Academic Value
Concept of PE as contributing to character building, often described as part of a 'silent curriculum'.
Specific references were made to teamwork, social skills, and moral development through PE, although concrete examples in practice were often lacking.
Examination of PE as a pragmatic response to the status of the subject, resulting in a perceived necessity to develop examinable PE curricula.
Health
Shift towards health and exercise-based ideologies among teachers, with an emphasis on active lifestyles post-school.
Some teachers felt that health considerations increasingly overshadowed traditional competitive sporting aspects of PE.
Conclusion and Discussion
PE teachers' 'philosophies' are marked by confusion and an amalgamation of disparate ideologies.
These reflect a blend of pragmatic concerns rather than a coherent philosophical rationale.
Sociological perspectives offer richer insights into understanding PE teachers' beliefs and practices than traditional philosophical views, emphasizing the influence of habitus and practical experience.
Key takeaway: Educational philosophies in PE may be better understood as processes shaped by teachers' lived experiences and the broader social context rather than static concepts.