Leadership and Governance
Consent
to align with ethical principles - autonomy
support:
informed consent - patient can understand/make decision, get full explanation, comprehend information, act voluntarily
truth-telling - give full information to patient
confidentiality - not sharing patient information without their consent
getting consent: CORU code of conduct and ethics
HSE National Consent Policy 2022
patients have legal and ethical rights to control their own lives, make informed decisions about their lives, decide what happens to their bodies
ongoing process
Steps to Getting Consent
healthcare worker providing intervention explains information to patient in way they can understand
healthcare worker needs to be qualified
give full information about the intervention
information about risks and benefits
information about alternative intervention options
information about what will happen if don’t go with intervention
give time for patient to ask any questions they have
patient can give written, verbal, non-verbal, or implied consent
when sure patient has decision-making capacity, can understand and remember information go ahead with intervention
clearly document information provided, patient agreement, type of consent obtained
Not valid consent if:
information not explained in a way patient could understand
patient doesn’t get sufficient information on risks/benefits of intervention
patient doesn’t get information on alternative options or information on what happens if they don’t get the intervention
they don’t have decision-making capacity
if person giving information about the intervention doesn’t have sufficient knowledge to give all information and answer patients questions
if person is in a state where they cannot remember and understand information (e.g. due to sedation, medicine, intoxication, fatigue, destress, condition)
they are acting under duress
threats/pressure from third party (family/therapist/other) and patient feels they have to consent
linked to safeguarding
Patient Refusing to Consent
respect valid consent
document: intervention offered and declined, detail what was explained to patient, alternative interventions provided, patient’s decision to refuse intervention
Patient Withdraws Consent
can withdraw at any time, even during intervention
if they withdraw: stop intervention, listen to and understand persons concerns, explain consequences of not doing intervention
document - refusal to consent
Open Disclosure
HSE Open Disclosure Policy 2019
Concerning safety incidents:
Harm event: unintended harm to patient
No-harm event: no actual harm caused but believed could have harmed
Near miss event: harm prevented by chance or quick save but could have caused harm
Aligns with duty of candour
Steps In Practice
From Open Disclosure Policy 2019 and National Open Disclosure Framework 2023
Safety Incident occurs
Staff member that detected incident will assess and talk with principal therapist to determine level of response (low or high response) - can use HSE risk assessment tool to support decision
Communication with patient within 24-48 hours (often meeting with patient and with a manager or colleague)
acknowledge the situation and impacts on patient
offering factual explanation of how and why happened
listening to patient’s experience of event
offering honest and meaningful apology
reassure patient about ongoing care - shared decision making about ongoing care and management of incident
reassure and discuss steps that will be taken to ensure event does not happen again
Patient support: entitled to acknowledgement, explanation, apology, reassurance
Staff support: encouraging reporting incidents, communication skills training, support through open disclosure process
Promoting an Open Disclosure Culture: developing a ‘just’ culture that acknowledges people make mistakes, and focus on learning and improvement
Governance: governance frameworks (policy, legislation, clinical governance and monitoring) and accountability structures should be in place
Monitoring and Evaluation: ongoing reporting, recording and measuring open disclosure practices
ongoing and consistent monitoring
reporting - to identify safety incidents
recording - documenting meeting, what was discussed, and agreed actions
reviewing - patient involved in review
Safeguarding
HSE Policy: Safeguarding vulnerable persons at risk of abuse (2014)
Types:
physical
sexual
financial
institutional
discriminator
neglect
psychological
Risk Factors
Personal
impaired social skills or judgement
impaired capacity
physical dependence
requires support with PADLs
lack of knowledge on how to defend against abuse
Organisational
low staff levels
high staff turnover
no ongoing staff training
reduced policy awareness
weak or inappropriate management
Procedures
concern raised due to
observation of incident
observation of signs of abuse
disclosure from vulnerable person
disclosure from friend/family
anonymous report
organisational complaints report
Day 1
immediate protection of person
listen, reassure, support person
if concerned about criminal offence - report to Garda
record and preserve physical evidence
document ASAP
when concern raised
who was involved and witnesses
what happened/what was disclosed - factual and in persons own words
relevant information such as past incidents
report to line manager/designated officer/safeguarding and protection team
Line manager/designated officer conducts preliminary screening process (within 3 days)
Self Neglect
Can manifest as:
poor hygiene
life threatening behaviour
mismanagement of financial
Procedure
consider possibility and discuss with person
go to safeguarding and protection team for support
assess
person’s awareness of referral and reactions to
gather information about concerns - info from other staff and previous attempts to intervene
meet with person to understand views and wishes
MDT meeting and possible comprehensive assessment
plan
lead person work with manager to co-ordinate and review
develop safeguarding plan with team and patient (if agree and has capacity)
build trust and monitor well-being - if disagrees and has capacity
review continuously
Ethics and GDPR
CORU code of professional conduct and ethics (2019)
Beneficence - acting for the wellbeing of the patient
non maleficence - avoiding doing or risking harm to the patient
autonomy - individuals have the right to make their own decisions
justice - fair and equal treatment of patients
GDPR and Confidentiality
Principles of GDPR
lawful, fairness, transparency
purpose limitation
data minimisation
accuracy
storage
integrity and confidentiality
accountability
Decision Making Capacity
Assisted Decision Making Act (2015) and the National Consent Policy (2022)
Principles
presume capacity
unwise decisions to not equal a lack of capacity
no lack of capacity until all supports are given
if lack capacity use least restrictive intervention
align assessment and intervention with clients will and preference
capacity is time and decision specific
Assessing
OT, SLT, SW, doctor, nurse, midwife
understand client circumstances before assessment
fully explain to patient why being assessed
lead by therapist proposing intervention
functional assessment - holistic review - MDT involvement (Usher and Stapleton, 2022)
institutional factors - limits functional assessment use as less staff and time, more adherence to risk management than patient autonomy (Usher and Stapleton, 2022)
cognitive assessment is not a capacity assessment - overemphasis on cognitive assessments (Usher and Stapleton, 2022)
Mindful of power imbalances in decision making - staff, environment, family (Usher and Stapleton, 2022)
Have Capacity If Can:
understand information about the decision
retain the information
use and weigh the information
communicate the decision
Supports
visual aids
AI
Language use
advocates
time
location
Levels of Assistance
decision making assistant
co-decision maker
decision making representative
attorney
designated healthcare representative
Decision support service: clients register with for assistance
QI and PDSA
Key Elements
PDSA - small changes/interventions to support confidence, efficacy, and reduce resistance to change
stakeholder involvement - people impacted by the change - important for buy in (Crowfoot and Prasad, 2017)
Oversimplifying and unclear on steps leads to failed projects (Reed and Card, 2016)
Institutional limitations include resources and time limiting consistent data collection and reflective practice, more focus on doing than reflecting - leads to less time in study phase and adapting actions (Reed and Card, 2016)
Example topics: creation and use of templates, clinical pathways, increasing use of standardised assessments, modifying tools used in practice
PDSA Steps
Model of Improvement
SMART Goal
Measurement of change
Ideas for change
example: 90% of all patients will receive OT initial contact within two days of admission by June (Ige and Hunt 2022)
PDSA
plan - aim, predicted outcomes, data collection, who, what, when, where, why, SWOT
do - carry out and document
study - evaluate success, planned vs obtained outcomes, what worked and didn’t work
act - revise plan, adjust based on what worked or didn’t
Career Progression
Quality Improvement Guide and Toolkit (2024)
Career Development framework (RCOT 2024)
Career development framework (RCOT 2024)
requires you have all four: professional practice, facilitation of learning, leadership, evidence, research and development
Leadership and Development
leadership is a foundation for improvement (Guide and toolkit 2024)
shows accountability - aligns with ethics and CORU continual development requirements
develop skills for senior role
develop professional profile
Communication and Teamwork
autonomy and teamwork skills
develop communication skills
giving and receiving feedback
supporting peers
developing a culture of communication and learning to better support staff and clients
Reflection and Evidence
critical thinking
reflective skills
challenging complacency
evidence based practice
client centred care