introducing the sociology of everyday life
how to read academic works
what is the author’s research question?
what is the author’s argument?
what literature is the author in conversation with?
what are the limitations of the existing literature?
what is the author’s intervention?
if it’s an empirical study, what is the author’s methodology?
why is this method appropriate/ideal for answering the research question?
what evidence did the author leverage to make their argument?
how did the author analyse the evidence?
sociology background
3 ways of understanding sociology:
by tracing the term’s etymology:
“socios”
Latin
‘companion’
“ology”
Greek
‘study of’
by look at what sociologists do:
sociological imagination: the ability to see the connections between our personal lives and the social world we live in
The Fundamental Question of Sociology: How is society possible?
social structure: patterns of social relationships and behaviours that work as a system to constrain individual choice
agency: the ability to influence the world around us
includes ability to modify social structure
by contrasting it with other social sciences:
economics: the study of the world from the standpoint of the economy
political science: the study of the world from the standpoint of the state
sociology: the study of the world from the standpoint of civil society
civil society: a set of organisations, associations, movements that exist outside both the state and the economy
under fascism/communism, sociology is often attacked, as it works to defend civil society
what is the sociology of everyday life?
Sociology of Everyday life does not equal Sociology in Everyday Life
Sociology of Everyday Life is a revolution within sociology that challenges the dominance of “macro sociology”
it “generates sociological concepts/insights from seemingly trivial settings”
major tenets
critique of macro sociology: overly deterministic; fail to capture the complexity of the everyday world; dualistic view of subject/object
contextuality: “naturally occurring interaction is the foundation of all understanding of society
model of the actor: derived from people’s everyday life attitudes and behaviour
social structure: emergent from but also in a reciprocal relationship with social interaction
brief history & thinkers
groundwork in 1920s-30s
George Herbert Mead
1863-1931
Uni of Chicago
pragmatic social behaviourism: a theory of how our sense of self emerge from social interactions
“looking-glass self” » we are who we think other people think we are
generalised other: an internalised sense of expectations of others
Edmund Husserl
1859-1938
Germany
phenomenology: the philosophical study of how we experience things from our own point of view
1950s-60s development
Herbert Blumer
1900-1987
UChicago to UCBerkeley in 1952
symbolic interactionism: the study of face-to-face interactions with particular attention to the creation of meaning
3 premises of symbolic interactionism:
we act toward things based on the meanings these things have for us
these meanings emerge from social interaction
these meanings are modified through an interpretive process which involves self-reflective individuals symbolically interacting with one another
Erving Goffman
published “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life”
dramaturgy: everyday social life is like a theatrical performance in which we are all actors on a metaphorical “stage”
impression management: we act in such a way that others will form desired impressions of us and our current situation
about communication, not just ‘deception’
Alfred Schutz
1899-1959
combined phenomenology with sociology
explored how our background knowledge and common sense help us interpret social situations
Harold Garfinkel
1917-2011
studied with Talcott Parsons @Harvard & Alfred Schutz who was in New York
UCLA, 1954 » developed ethnomethodology
ethnomethodology: the study of the methods people use for producing recognisable social orders
sheds light on the most mundane aspect of our everyday life, often by adding “doing” in front of any social given to highlight its accomplished character
eg doing gender, doing friendship, doing ‘being ordinary’
breaking experiments: deliberately breaking social norms to reveal hidden rules
Harvey Sacks
studied with Goffman, worked with Garfinkel
developed Conversation Analysis (CA) - the study of how people take turns, repair misunderstandings and use talk to organise their interactions in everyday life
investigates the structural organisation of casual talk in everyday settings
“such structural analysis of talk served as a guideline for interpersonal interaction and its analysis”
relation to 70s’ women’s liberation
expansion of higher education brought more women into academia
“the personal is political” » slogan heightened the importance of the Sociology of Everyday Life
the Soc of EL provided an analytical lens to examine the routine oppression women experience daily
“many domains of life which a women might herself identify as ‘persona’ were not idiosyncratic but interactional in character’
∴ not a coincidence that Feminist Sociology is deeply grounded in this interactionist tradition