Chapter 1 Comparative Government
1.1 - All about Comparative
Comparative Politics: Study of similarities and differences(compare) between states and government system operations and the cause of political changes
Compare political phenomenon in various places and times
Mainly about power and decisions within countries (not with each other)
Can’t be a pure science
1.2 - Thinking Like a Political Scientist
Not like normal scientists when conducting experiments
Think about changes going on and modify behavior accordingly but gov. Isn’t lab rat
Experiments are rather systematic research that reaches conclusions
Can predict voter behavior and turnout
Comparative Method: Examine same phenomenon in several cases and reach conclusions from each case
Causation v. Correlation:
Causation: change in one variable leads to change in another variable
Hard to prove because events are usually result of multiple factors as nothing acts according to scientific rules
Correlation: apparent connection between variables
positive correlation -> two variables move in same direction
Inverse correlation -> one variable increases and other decreases
Two variables correlate with a third but no connection between first two
Fire and ice cream increase in July because of weather (both correlate with July but not with each other)
Empirical Statement: assertion that’s a fact that can be proven
Usually based on data
What actually occurs
Normative Statement: value judgment
What should occur
Quantitative data: observations made using stats
Numbers based
Qualitative data: text-based descriptions
Words based
Need to source analysis: ability to read and analyze texts
1.3 - Comparing Economic Development
Human Development Index: aggregate measure of life expectancy, education, and per capita income
Categorized from very high to low development and are ranked from 1-189
Criticized of equal weighting
Development: becoming like the Western world
Economically: urbanize and industrialize
Ie. China
Poli sci says economic growth isn’t direct development
Focus on poorest of the poor in terms of development
Amartya Sen: goal of development should be enhancing capabilities of each person to lead fulfilling lives
Healthy, educated, and free (emphasis on free)
No gender norms
Live in democracy
Basis of HDI
GDP: represent total value of goods and services produced in a country per year; comprehensive measure
Indicator of country’s economic health
Critics because doesn’t account for population or black market
GDP per capita:
GDP/population
Better comparison but it’s average not distribution(so doesn’t capture most citizens)
GDP growth rate
Measure how much GDP has grown over time
Gini Index:
Measures income inequality
Supports notion rich stay rich and poor stay poor
Higher the score the bigger the gap
Leads to civil unrest
If all equal could mean all poor so not always good
As economy improves everyone improves so rich stay rich and poor stay poor
1..4 - Comparing Political Development
Freedom House: NGO that advocates for human rights and democracy and measures freedom around the world
Studies -> policy recommendations
hold s gov. Accountability
Freedom house scores: classified as free, partially free, and not free
Based on political rights and civil liberties
Political rights(up to 40): free and fair elections, pluralism, and participation
Civil Liberties(up to 60): freedom of expression, belief, association, rule of law, and individual rights and autonomy
Can score negative
Critics say you can’t number freedom
Democratic Consolidation: regime developed stable democratic institution with a lot of civil liberties and won’t go back
Democracy is widely accepted by citizens and gov
Transparency International: NGO that reduces corruption by advocating for transparency and accountability
Corruption: abuse of official power for personal benefit
Grand Corruption: at the highest level of society and causes significant harm but bc elite no punishment
Petty Corruption: everyday abuse of power by gov. In interactions with citizens
Hinders democracy as it overrides rule of law and harms trust
Corruption Perception Index: measure corruption in a system
Measures people’s encounters with corruption
0-100 (100 is clean)
Fragile State Index: highlight countries in imminent danger of failure (high scores are bad)
Based on social indicators, economic indicators, political indicators, and cohesion indicators (military, police, leadership, groups)
Strong state: provides necessary gov. Services
Weak state: distributes certain necessities but not well
Easy to replace by local strongmen, church, ngo, or cartel
Failed state: weake state that loses control
Gov. collapse
Lacks resources for basic needs citizens support is gone
Lack of resources leads to little pay
Leads to corruption
Steps to Strengthen State:
Diverse economy
Improve infrastructure
Improve education
Protect environment
Enhance democracy
Prevent overpopulation
Help refugees
Critics: vague and can’t predict when collapse will occur