administrator,+GOLDSTEIN-StereotypeThreat-XXIX-2
Abstract
Exposure to stereotypes targeting American identity is a significant source of stress for U.S. student sojourners across racial/ethnic groups.
Examines vulnerability and reactions to stereotype threat in US students abroad.
Stereotype threat: Expectation of negative judgment based on social identity stereotypes.
Study utilized online questionnaires for 95 students before and after the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Key findings: Gender, cultural intelligence, and exposure to Trump-related stereotypes predict stereotype threat.
Responses to stereotype threat may include distancing from U.S. identity and altering appearance/behavior.
Implications for support and future research are discussed.
Introduction
Encountering stereotypes as Americans abroad is a major source of stress for students.
Impact of stereotypes on national identity and psychological adjustment highlighted.
Identity development: Critical during the average age of students studying abroad.
Lack of research on the conditions contributing to sensitivity to stereotyping.
Understanding stereotypes can enable better support for students studying abroad.
Stereotype Threat
Definition: Occurs when individuals expect negative judgment based on their social group.
Situational cues can lead to feeling at risk of confirming stereotypes.
Predominantly researched in academic performance but also affects social engagement.
Predictors of Stereotype Threat
Internal Factors: Strong identification with the targeted group increases vulnerability.
External Factors: Higher visibility in social situations correlates with higher stereotype threat.
Proposed hypotheses to investigate:
H1: Stronger identification with U.S. nationality predicts greater stereotype threat.
H2: Greater perceived visibility in the host culture predicts greater stereotype threat.
Sociopolitical climate affects stereotype threat; especially prevalent during high-profile events (e.g., 2016 Presidential election).
Experiences of U.S. Students Abroad
American students encountered Trump stereotypes affecting their experiences:
Feelings of embarrassment and discomfort discussed in student blogs and interviews.
Hypothesis H3: Greater exposure to negative stereotypes will lead to greater stereotype threat.
Cultural Intelligence
Definition: Intercultural skills and motivation can mitigate stereotype threat.
Hypothesis H4: Higher cultural intelligence associates with lower stereotype threat.
Hypothesis H5: Psychological well-being correlates negatively with stereotype threat.
Responses to Stereotype Threat
Various reactions include:
Disengaging: Detaching from the threatened social group.
Distancing: Changing behavior to appear less typical of the group.
Avoiding interactions with other group members.
Assimilating: Adopting characteristics of a more respected group.
Challenging stereotypes through positive communication of group attributes.
Method
Institutional Review Board (IRB) compliance and ethical procedures were followed.
Sample included 95 students: 15 males and 80 females. Varied backgrounds and study locations (Europe, Asia, etc.).
Instruments for assessing stereotype exposure, stereotype threat, visibility, American identity, and cultural intelligence were detailed.
Results
Stereotype Exposure
Common stereotypes identified include:
Loudness, Trump supporters, friendliness, uneducated, rude, drinking habits, and wealth.
Trump stereotype highlighted as prevalent in discussions.
Correlates and Predictors of Stereotype Threat
Preliminary analyses indicated significant correlates with visibility and cultural intelligence measures.
Results revealed that female participants reported higher stereotype threat.
Discussion
Strength of national identity prior to study abroad did not predict stereotype threat as expected.
Visibility in the host culture positively correlated but not a strong predictor.
Exposure to Trump-related stereotypes significantly predicted stereotype threat.
Cultural intelligence (CQ) knowledge could help counter stereotype threats.
Lack of correlation between psychological well-being and stereotype threat needs further exploration.
Limitations and Future Research
Study limitations include small sample size, single institution, and gender representation.
Future research should examine a wider range of students and incorporate queries about their political attitudes.
Implications for Study Abroad Programs
Increased awareness of stereotype threat's impact on students is necessary for support and preparation.
Training on recognizing and managing stereotypes can be beneficial.
Research into the clinical implications of stereotype threat and its effects on adjustment and well-being is recommended.