Theories of Crime: 1950-1960
Inner and Outer Containment Theory
Defining Inner Containment
Involves self-control and self-perception.
To commit crime, individuals must overcome their inner controls which dictate their self-concept and personal restraint.
Defining Outer Containment
Involves influences from family, peer groups, and societal structures.
Breaking through these external controls is also necessary for deviant behavior.
Example Case: Theodore Kaczynski (Unabomber)
Extreme Ideas
Kaczynski exhibited a breakdown in inner control, indicated by his radical thoughts and self-perception.
Isolation
His choice to live away from societal engagements diminished outer controls which normally regulate behavior.
Result: He managed to break through both inner and outer containments leading to his criminal activities.
Albert Reiss's Control Theory
Context of Theory
Delinquency is viewed as a symptom of the failure of personal and social controls.
Personal Control
Individual restraint over actions that could conflict with societal norms.
Social Control
The effectiveness of social groups in influencing behavior.
Example Case: Central Park Five
Five boys wrongfully accused of raping a jogger.
Lacked parental social control during police questioning, weakening their inner controls, leading to false confessions.
They felt compelled to admit guilt to escape interrogation pressures.
Drift Theory by Sykes and Matza
Concept of Drift
Individuals oscillate between conformity and delinquency.
Not all criminals are always engaged in criminal behavior; they drift in and out.
Techniques of Neutralization (Sykes & Matza)
Denial of Responsibility
Ex: A teen vandalizing property blames peer pressure.
Denial of Injury
Ex: An employee embezzles, believing the company won’t miss the money.
Denial of the Victim
Ex: An assaulter argues the victim provoked the assault.
Condemnation of the Condemners
Ex: A student caught cheating accuses teachers of bias.
Appeal to Higher Loyalties
Ex: A gang member commits violence for group allegiance.
1950s vs. 1960s America
The Prosperous 1950s
Economic boom for white families, especially with favorable tax codes post-WWII.
More families owned homes and televisions leading to increased stability and conformity among the population.
Changes in the 1960s
Rise of civil rights and feminist movements.
Anti-Vietnam War protests initiated a wave of social turmoil and questioning of authority.
Hershey's Social Bond Theory
General Theory of Crime
Explains criminality across different demographics and factors, prioritizing social bonds.
Components of Social Control
Social Bonds: Bonds to social groups prevent delinquency through fear of negative consequences.
Conformity as a Tool
Conformity maintains social bonds; weakened bonds decrease conformity.
Commitment Types in Social Control Theory
Four Types of Commitment
Calculated Commitment: Pursuing goals from the group.
Attitudinal Commitment: Exhibiting supportive attitudes towards the group.
Behavioral Commitment: Engaging in expected behaviors even without attitudinal alignment.
Identity Commitment: Seeing oneself as part of the group and practicing its norms even outside the group context.
Importance of Attachment in Social Control
Attachments
Strong emotional ties to parents, peers, and authority figures play a crucial role in preventing deviance.
Weak attachments increase susceptibility to joining deviant groups.
Development of Self-Control Theory
Nature of Self-Control
Developed in childhood through familial structures and societal expectations.
Self-control is identified as a key factor in the likelihood of criminal behavior.
Opportunity and Crime
Criminal acts are more frequent when individuals have lower self-control and higher opportunity for crime.
Critical Examination of Theories
Weaknesses in Hershey's Theory
Did not adequately address frustrations related to social inequalities like race and gender.
Lacks attention to external factors like economic disorganization.
Comparison to Akers' Differential Association
Hershey challenges the notion that criminality is solely learned behavior.
Emphasizes the role of self-interest in decision-making related to crime.