Social Studies Review
CONSTITUTION
the plan for the government of the United States
BILL OF RIGHTS
Guarantee that the government would not take away people’s basic rights
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Protected in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights
3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
3 separate groups have different powers and responsibilities
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
Congress, make the laws
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
The president, enforces the laws
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Supreme Court, interprets the laws
CHECKS AND BALANCES
Each branch of government has ways to stop the other two branches from having too
much power
2 CHECKS BY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Choose two: veto laws, appoint Supreme Court Justices, appoint members of his
cabinet, influence public opinion
2 CHECKS BY THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
Choose two: override a veto, approve Supreme Court Justices that the president
appoints, approve members of the cabinet, impeach the president
1 CHECK BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH
Choose one: decide if a law goes against the constitution, decide if an action by the president goes against the constitution
POWERS OF THE FEDERAL (NATIONAL) GOVERNMENT
Make war with other nations
Producing the money that is used throughout the nation
POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENTS
Provide public education
Marriage and driver’s licenses
POWERS OF BOTH THE FEDERAL AND THE STATE GOVERNMENTS
Make and enforce laws
Collect taxes
REASONS FOR WHISKEY REBELLION
The new government led by George Washington was in debt and needed money
They decided on a tax on whiskey which upset farmers who produced whiskey
RESULTS OF WHISKEY REBELLION
After farmers in Pennsylvania went into revolt against the government, Washington sent
troops to put a stop to it.
It showed the new government would stand up for itself and enforce its laws.
BELIEFS OF FEDERALIST PARTY
Strong federal government
Loose interpretation of the constitution
BELIEFS OF DEMOCRATIC- REPUBLICANS
Weak federal government, strong state governments
Strict interpretation of the constitution
LOOSE INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION
The belief that even if an idea isn’t in the constitution it can still be done
STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION
The belief that if something isn’t directly written in the constitution it cannot be done