Phonemic and Articulatory Comparison of English and Arabic Consonants

English Consonant Articulation and Classification

  • Bilabial (Both Lips):     * Stops: /b//b/ (voiced), /p//p/ (voiceless).     * Nasal: /m//m/ (voiced).     * Semivowel: /w//w/ (voiced).
  • Labiodental (Lower Lip and Upper Teeth):     * Fricatives: /v//v/ (voiced), /f//f/ (voiceless).
  • Interdental (Tip of Tongue and Teeth):     * Fricatives: // (voiced), /ˉ//̄/ (voiceless).
  • Apicoalveolar (Tip of Tongue and Tooth Ridge):     * Stops: /d//d/ (voiced), /t//t/ (voiceless).     * Fricatives: /z//z/ (voiced), /s//s/ (voiceless).     * Nasal: /n//n/ (voiced).     * Lateral: /l//l/ (voiced).     * Semivowel: /r//r/ (voiced).
  • Laminopalatal (Front Part of Tongue and Hard Palate):     * Affricates: /d3//d3/ (voiced), /tʃ//tʃ/ (voiceless).     * Fricatives: /ʒ//ʒ/ (voiced), /ʃ//ʃ/ (voiceless).     * Semivowel: /y//y/ (voiced).
  • Dorsovelar (Back of Tongue and Soft Palate):     * Stops: /g//g/ (voiced), /k//k/ (voiceless).     * Nasal: /ŀ//ŀ/ (voiced).
  • Glottal (Throat):     * Fricative: /h//h/ (voiceless).

Note on Phonemic Status in Arabic:

  • Sounds that are not phonemic in Arabic include: /p//p/, /v//v/, /tʃ//tʃ/, /ʒ//ʒ/, and /ŀ//ŀ/.
  • Regional variations for the voiced affricate/stop group: Arabs typically use only one of /d3//d3/, /ʒ//ʒ/, or /g//g/ and lack the others.     * Saudis and Iraqis: /d3//d3/     * Levantines and North Africans: /ʒ//ʒ/     * Cairenes: /g//g/

Arabic Consonant Phoneme Classification and Comparisons

  • Unique Arabic Categories:     * Emphatic/Velarized (Pharyngealized): Indicated by a subscript dot. These include ///ṭ/, ///ḍ/, ///ṣ/, and ///ḏ/ (though ///ḏ/ is sometimes substituted).     * Uvular: /q//q/ (voiceless stop).     * Pharyngeal: /ħ//ħ/ (voiceless fricative) and /ʕ//ʕ/ (voiced fricative).     * Uvular Fricatives: /x//x/ (voiceless) and /ɣ//ɣ/ (voiced).
  • Stops:     * Bilabial: /b//b/ (voiced).     * Dental: /t//t/ (voiceless), /d//d/ (voiced), ///ṭ/ (voiceless emphatic), ///ḍ/ (voiced emphatic).     * Velar: /k//k/ (voiceless).     * Uvular: /q//q/ (voiceless).     * Glottal: /ʔ//ʔ/ (voiceless).
  • Dialectal Variations and Substitutions:     * In some dialects, /ˉ//̄/ is replaced by /s//s/, // by /z//z/, and ///ḏ/ by a velarized ///ḍ/ (which occurs as a substitute).     * Standard/Literary Arabic Ideal: The following sounds are preferred in literary pronunciation: /d3//d3/ (vs /ʒ//ʒ/ or /g//g/), // (vs /z//z/), /ˉ//̄/ (vs /s//s/), and ///ḏ/ (vs ///ṣ/).     * Substitution Patterns: Cairenes tend to substitute /g,s,z,z//g, s, z, z/ for the literary forms; Druze substitute /ʒ, ̄, /; and Baghdadis typically use /d3, ̄, /.
  • The Phoneme /r//r/:     * Structurally and functionally interchangeable between English and Arabic, but phonetically different.     * Arabic /r//r/ is a flap.     * Arabic /rr//rr/ is a trill.

Comparative Phonology: Bilabial Stops /p//p/ and /b//b/

  • Phonemic Status: In Arabic, /p//p/ and /b//b/ are not separate phonemes. The voiceless stop /p//p/ occurs only as an allophonic variant of voiced /b//b/. This leads to difficulty for Arabic speakers in distinguishing them as separate phonemes.
  • Articulation Issues:     * Muffled Distinction: In initial and final positions, the distinction is often muffled. An English listener may find it hard to determine if /pen//pen/ or /big//big/ was intended.     * Release Patterns: Arabic word-final stops are always fully released. In English, a word like "cat" can be /kæth//kæt^h/ or /kæt//kæt/, but an Arabic speaker will always use /kæt//kæt/ with full release.
  • Hyperperformance and Aspiration:     * Arabs may hyperperform /p//p/ by aspiring it where it should not be:         * topmost/[taphmost]/[tap^h most]         * clasps/[klæsphs]/[klæsph s]         * tap with → /[tæph wI]
  • Interactions with Semivowels:     * In English, /l,r,w,y//l, r, w, y/ should be slightly devoiced after /p//p/. Arabic speakers often fail to devoice them:         * pray/[bre]/[bre]         * pure/[byur]/[byur]     * Epenthetic vowels may be inserted: play/[pəleI]/[pəleI].
  • Aspiration and Plosion Rules:     * /p//p/ and /b//b/ should not explode before /t//t/ or /d//d/. Arabs struggle here: apt/[æpht]/[æp^ht] or rubbed/[rəbhd]/[rəb^hd] or /[rəbId]/[rəbId].     * Before /ˉ//̄/ and //, plosion should be absorbed by the fricative. Arabic speakers often produce a strongly released /p//p/:         * depth/[dephˉ]/[dep^h̄] or /[dephəs]/[dep^həs].

Comparative Phonology: Alveolar Stops /t//t/ and /d//d/

  • Place of Articulation: Arabic /t//t/ and /d//d/ are dental (tongue at teeth), whereas English /t//t/ and /d//d/ are alveolar.
  • Aspiration in English /t//t/:     * Arabs handle strong aspiration well (e.g., tool /[thul]/[t^hul] or attempt /[əthempt]/[ət^hempt]).     * Difficulty arises with weak aspiration (final position or before unstressed syllables): pit /[pIt]/[pIt] or writer /[raItə]/[raItə].
  • Release Issues: Arabic speakers often strongly release /t//t/ and /d//d/ in final positions where they should be unreleased in English: bad /[bæd]/[bæd]. This sounds overly emphatic.
  • Intervocalic Flapping: In the middle of words, English /t//t/ and /d//d/ often resemble a flap /ɾ//ɾ/. Arabic speakers tend to carefully and clearly pronounce them instead: ladder /[lædə]/[lædə] or letter /[lεthə]/[lεt^hə].
  • Voiced /t//t/ Contexts: Arabic speakers often use a strongly articulated voiceless /t//t/ in positions where it should be voiced or reduced in English, such as:     * Intervocalically: butter /[bʈtə]/[bʈtə].     * Syllabic /l//l/: subtle /[sʌ t̩].     * Between /l//l/ or /n//n/ and unstressed vowels: malted /[mɔltId]/[mɔltId], twenty /[twentI]/[twentI].
  • Stop Clusters: There is no plosion when /t//t/ occurs before other stops (at camp, light bomb), but Arabs are likely to pronounce them with plosion as /[athkhæmph]/[at^h khæmph] and /[laIthbæm]/[laIt^h bæm].
  • Interaction with Fricatives: Release of /t//t/ and /d//d/ is usually absorbed by following fricatives (hits, bids). Arabs occasionally insert a vowel: /[hItəs]/[hItəs] or /[bidəz]/[bidəz].

Comparative Phonology: Velar Stops, Glottal Stops, and Fricatives

  • Velar Stops /k//k/ and /g//g/:     * /g//g/ is problematic for those whose dialects lack it (Cairenes and Bedouins have it, others may use /d3//d3/ or /ʒ//ʒ/).     * Vowel insertion is common before stops or fricatives: act/[ækət]/[ækət], begged/[begəd]/[begəd], dogs/[dɔgəz]/[dɔgəz].
  • The Glottal Stop /ʔ//ʔ/:     * Arabic speakers tend to pronounce /ʔ//ʔ/ before every word-initial vowel.     * In English, /ʔ//ʔ/ is phonetic (non-phonemic) and occurs between vowels (India office /[Indiəʔofəs]/[Indiə ʔofəs]) or at the start of a phrase (I did /[ʔaIdId]/[ʔaIdId]).     * The student must learn to think in terms of phrases rather than isolated words to avoid this.
  • Fricative /v/ vs /f/: /v//v/ does not exist in Arabic. Speakers often confuse /v//v/ and /f//f/: feel and veal may both be pronounced as /[fil]/[fil]. Hyperperformance may lead to /[vil]/[vil] for both.
  • Interdental Fricatives /ˉ//̄/ and //: Those unfamiliar with Classical Arabic may substitute /z//z/ for // and /s//s/ for /ˉ//̄/: brother/[brazə]/[brazə], author/[ʔosə]/[ʔosə].
  • Affricates: Iraqi and Bedouin Arabs may confuse /g//g/ (their substitute for literary /q//q/) with /d3//d3/ and /ʒ//ʒ/.

Comparative Phonology: Nasals and Other Consonants

  • Nasal /m//m/: Bilabial, but becomes labiodental before /f//f/ (comfort). This causes no issues for Arabic speakers.
  • Nasal /n//n/: English /n//n/ is alveolar (dental before /ˉ//̄/). Arabic /n//n/ is dental unless followed by a non-dental consonant, where its point of articulation varies (e.g., bint /[bInt]/[bInt] is dental).
  • The Velar Nasal /ŀ//ŀ/:     * Phonemic in English (singer, long).     * In Arabic, /ŀ//ŀ/ is only an allophonic variant of /n//n/ occurring before velar stops (like finger).     * Arabs have difficulty producing /ŀ//ŀ/ without the following /g//g/ stop: singer/[singə]/[singə], ringing/[ringIng]/[ringIng]. This is reinforced by the spelling of these words.
  • Syllabic Consonants: In English, /m//m/ and /n//n/ can function as vowels (button /[bʌtn̩], schism /[sIzm̩]).     * Problem 1: If a word is spelled with -en or -em, the Arab speaker will give the vowel its full value instead of using a syllabic consonant.     * Problem 2: Difficulties arise in distinguishing the resulting reduced word structures.
  • Cavity Friction /h//h/:     * In English, /h//h/ is restricted: it cannot follow a vowel in the same syllable. In Arabic, it can occur in all positions.     * Arabic speakers generally have little trouble with /h//h/ except for the cluster /hw//hw/ (where, which), where they often substitute /w//w/ (though many English speakers also do this).