BIO153 Lecture 6

Page 1: Introduction

  • University of Toronto Mississauga Arbor Lecture 6

    • Course: BIO153 Diversity of Organisms

    • Instructor: Ichiro Inamoto

Page 2: Question on Coffee Acquisition

  • Scenario presented:

    • A student arrived at UTM via public bus at 8:30 AM and was seen in IB110 at 9:05 holding a cup of coffee from Tim Horton's.

  • Question: What is the more likely explanation for how the student got the coffee?

      1. Walked from the bus stop to Tim Hortons for coffee.

      1. Took a convoluted route involving multiple coffee stops before arriving at IB110.

Page 3: Cladistics Overview

  • Definition of Cladistics: An approach in systematics that classifies organisms based on ancestral relationships.

  • Definition of Clades: Groups of organisms classified together.

  • Clade relationships: A clade does not necessarily reflect 'correct' evolutionary relatedness among grouped organisms.

    • Example Clades: Primates/Rodents, Moles/Hedgehogs, Cats/Dogs/Seals, and Horses/Rhinos.

    • Clade 1: Monotremes

    • Clade 2: Marsupials

    • Clade 3: Placentals

Page 4: Monophyletic Groups

  • Definition: A clade that includes all members as descendants of their most recent common ancestor.

    • Example: Clade ABC is monophyletic.

  • Relative reference: The classification can change based on what members are included/excluded from the clade.

Page 5: Paraphyletic Groups

  • Definition: A group that includes all descendants of the most recent common ancestor but excludes some.

    • Example: Clade DEF shares the most recent ancestor but excludes descendent G.

  • Characteristics: These groups are incomplete representations of close evolutionary relatives.

Page 6: Historical Misclassification

  • Discussion of reptiles: Birds are closely related to lizards and dinosaurs.

    • Historical misclassification resulted in "Reptiles" being paraphyletic by excluding birds.

Page 7: Polyphyletic Groups

  • Definition: A clade which includes organisms from different evolutionary lineages.

    • Example: Clade ABCD with mixed lineages from different ancestors.

  • Caution: Differences between para- and polyphyletic groupings can be debated, leading to complexity in classification.

Page 8: Classification Mistakes

  • Common Misclassifications:

    • Paraphyletic (e.g., excluding dolphins from Deer/Hippo clade)

    • Polyphyletic (e.g., classifying Dolphins and Seals together due to superficial similarity).

Page 9: Understanding "Algae"

  • Definition: Eukaryotic photoautotrophs that are not classified as plants.

  • Historical views incorrectly labeled many non-plant organisms as algae.

  • Algal species belong to multiple independent taxa, making 'Algae' a polyphyletic group.

Page 10: Cyanobacteria

  • Notable Mention: Cyanobacteria also referred to as 'blue-green algae', showcasing the common naming issues.

Page 11: Classification Guidelines

  • Cladistics Approach: Organize organisms by prioritizing ancestry.

  • Key Guidelines:

    1. Track shared ancestral vs. derived characters.

    2. Beware of traits arising from convergent evolution.

Page 12: Ingroup and Outgroup Defined

  • Ingroup: The species under classification (e.g., frog, cow, dog).

  • Outgroup: A closely related species that shares no common derived traits (e.g., fish).

  • Character Table Creation:

    • Use homologous traits to create a table reflecting presence (1) or absence (0) of traits across species.

Page 13: Phylogenetic Tree Construction

  • Initial Tree Building: Start by separating the outgroup from the ingroup based on traits.

    • Example: Fish lineage vs. Frog/Cow/Dog lineage based on the presence of four legs.

Page 14: Further Divergences

  • Post-Divergence Analysis: Assess which lineage evolved specific traits, such as four legs.

  • Traits' Evolution: Certain traits may derive only in specific lineages while remaining absent in others.

Page 15: More Divergences

  • Classifying Differences: Identify how the ingroup diverged into 'mammals' and 'non-mammals' based on shared ancestry.

Page 16: Final Divergences

  • Final Steps in Classification: Distinguishing within mammals based on traits like canines and milk feeding.

Page 17: Analyzing Evolution Conditions

  • Question Posed: Which traits are likely the result of evolutionary pathways?

Page 18: Maximum Parsimony Principle

  • Definition: The simplest explanation among multiple possibilities is often the most likely.

  • Application: Utilized in cladistics and further analysis regarding organisms' traits.

Page 19: Gene Classification in Cladistics

  • Gene Studies: Mutations in genes are analyzed separately for phylogenetic inference.

Page 20: Gene Mutation Analysis

  • Example with Site 1: Ancestral sequence evaluations lead to examining the most parsimonious evolutionary pathways.

Page 21: Continued Mutation Examination

  • Illustration of Site 4: Refining the understanding of mutation events and their evolutionary implications.

Page 22: Mapping Evolution Events

  • Comprehensive Scenario Mapping: Evaluate multiple evolutionary pathways to identify the most parsimonious and plausible scenarios.

Page 23: Discrepancy Resolution

  • Overall Mapping: Align all evolutionary events across all scenarios to determine the best explanation.

Page 24: The Role of Computers in Molecular Genetics

  • Computational Necessity: As species to resolve increase, the complexity of trees and calculations grows dramatically.

  • Maximum likelihood methods help to analyze mutation frequency in phylogenetics.

Page 25: Complexity of Taxonomy

  • Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT): Challenges the traditional ancestor-descendant model, complicating lineage relationships.

  • Implications for classification: HGT may lead to misleading classifications regarding organism relationships.