Feasibility Analysis & Idea Assessment – Comprehensive Study Notes
Learning Objectives
- By the end of Chapters 3 & 4 you should be able to:
- Describe the process of conducting an idea assessment and the elements of feasibility analysis
- Identify the six forces in an industry’s macro environment
- Use Porter’s Five Forces Model to assess competitive intensity
- Select and employ primary vs. secondary market-research methods
- Recognize the four major elements of a financial feasibility analysis
- Gauge entrepreneurial feasibility (personal & team readiness)
The New-Business Planning Funnel
- Entrepreneurs often generate many raw ideas ➜ must narrow them methodically
- Five sequential filters (broad → specific):
- Idea assessment
- Feasibility study
- Business model design
- Business plan creation
- Strategic planning for growth
- Each stage screens out weak concepts, conserving , and emotional energy
1. Idea Assessment
- Purpose: quickly sift through multiple concepts before costly analysis/modeling
- Mind-set: stay objective; do not become emotionally attached to one idea
- Tool: Idea Sketch Pad (visual one-page canvas)
- Customers
- Define the users and buyers (e.g., sugary cereal ⇒ child = user, parent = buyer)
- Key Qs: Who? How many? How/when will they use the offering?
- Offering
- Product, service, experience, or hybrid? Key features? Sketch if possible
- Value Proposition
- Why is it valuable? How does it solve an unmet need better than current options?
- Core Competencies
- Unique tech, IP, patents, trade secrets, or processes that yield differentiation?
- People (Founding Team)
- Skills, knowledge gaps, recruitment ability
- Outcome:
- If gaps are minor → iterate & proceed to feasibility study
- If gaps are major → drop & test the next idea
2. Feasibility Analysis – Four Interrelated Components
- Definition: rigorous study answering “Should we proceed with this business idea?”
- Components (interdependent):
- Industry & Market Feasibility
- Product/Service Feasibility
- Financial Feasibility
- Entrepreneur/Team Feasibility
2.1 Industry & Market Feasibility
Macro-Environment Scan – Six Foundational Forces
| Force | Illustrative Shifts | Example Impacts |
|---|---|---|
| Sociocultural | Values, lifestyles | Rise of dual-income households ⇒ daycare, business attire for women, restaurant growth |
| Technological | Breakthroughs & adoption rates | Internet spawned Spotify, iTunes; eroded newspaper ad revenue |
| Demographic | Age, cohort traits | Generation Z (1996-2010) frugal, realistic ⇒ seek value products |
| Economic | GDP, cycles, income | -Learning boomed during Great Recession as low-cost up-skilling option |
| Political & Legal | Laws, regulation | Obamacare created metrics-tracking & performance-consulting niches |
| Global | Trade openness, cross-border flows | Even micro-firms source suppliers & sell worldwide |
- Key evaluation Qs (demand, growth, profitability, margins, threats, crowding, life-cycle stage)
Porter’s Five Forces – Competitive Environment
- Rivalry among existing firms
- Attractive when competitors are many (fragmented) or very few; high growth; differentiation possible
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Low when many commodity suppliers, easy switching, inputs are minor cost share
- Bargaining power of buyers
- Low when many buyers, high switching costs, need differentiated products
- Threat of new entrants
- Low when strong economies of scale, high capital, loyal buyers, regulatory barriers
- Threat of substitutes
- Low when few quality substitutes, switching costs high, substitute prices not far lower
Weighted scoring tool: Five Forces Matrix
- Rate each force’s importance (1–5) × threat (1–5)
- = very attractive; = very unattractive industry
Market Niche Strategy
- Focus on segment “too small” or “specialized” for big rivals
- Benefits: lower resource needs, faster cash flow, higher margins, less direct competition
- Cautions: niches evolve, shrink, or grow (may invite giants) ⇒ continuous adaptation required (e.g., craft-beer microbreweries vs. Anheuser-Busch acquisitions)
2.2 Product / Service Feasibility
- Central Question: Will customers actually buy?
- Requires robust market research
Primary Research (first-hand data)
- Customer surveys/questionnaires
- Keep short, unbiased, representative sample, use 1-to-5 scales
- Focus groups (8–12 participants; can be virtual)
- Prototypes & beta tests (3-D printing lowers cost of initial models)
- In-home trials (observe real usage; costly)
- “Windshield” research (traffic counts, store visits, informal observation)
Secondary Research (existing data)
- Trade associations & directories (e.g., Thomas Register, Encyclopedia of Associations)
- Industry databases: BizMiner, IBISWorld, Market Share Reporter, etc.
- Demographic references: State & Metropolitan Data Book, ZIP Code Sourcebooks
- Census.gov, Dept. of Commerce forecasts
- Market-research report compendia: FINDex, Simmons, Nielsen
- Local chambers of commerce, state agencies
- Internet (verify credibility)
- Rule: use secondary to support—not replace—primary data; seek disconfirming evidence as well
2.3 Financial Feasibility
- Top-level question: Can the venture generate adequate profit & cash flow?
- Four key elements:
- Initial Capital Requirement
- Varies to multi-millions; U.S. mean
- Bootstrapping: creative resource leverage (volunteers, bartering, pre-sales). Cigar City Brewing raised ; still sold later due to scale constraints
- Estimated Earnings
- Use trade benchmarks (RMA, BizMiner) to project sales, margins, net income
- Time Out of Cash
- 49% of start-ups fail from under-capitalization ⇒ plan with conservative assumptions
- Return on Investment (ROI)
- Must compensate for venture risk (> bank CD rate). Higher risk ⇒ higher required return
2.4 Entrepreneur / Team Feasibility (Entrepreneurial Readiness)
- Assess knowledge, skills, experience, temperament, work ethic, risk tolerance
- Self-assessment template (highlights):
- Personal aspirations & energy sources vs. drains
- Success metrics (family, wealth, community impact)
- Core values & origins (fairness, social good, etc.)
- Time commitment capacity & stress behavior
- Financial position: income need, runway (months without paycheck), assets at risk
- Non-financial risks: reputation, relationships
- Emotional reaction to seeing others launch “your” idea
- Team building: recruit complementary skills (e.g., coder + marketer + designer)
- Venture-Life Fit: does the business meet founders’ income, wealth, lifestyle, travel, and family goals (e.g., restaurant hours vs. desire for vacations)?
Key Takeaways & Practical Steps
- Generate many ideas; use the Idea Sketch Pad to screen quickly.
- Conduct a feasibility analysis before spending heavily:
- Macro + competitive scans ➜ validate attractive industry & niche
- Voice-of-customer via balanced primary & secondary research
- Broad-brush financials: capital, earnings, cash runway, ROI
- Honest look in the mirror: skills, risk, lifestyle, team gaps
- If the concept clears all four feasibility filters, proceed to business-model design (next chapter).
- If it fails, pivot or abandon early—before wasting scarce resources.