Michael Perry (2) - Presentation on University Development
Presenter Introduction
Presenter: Michael Perry
Role: Archivist and Special Collections Librarian at the University Library
Commitment to the history of the university, focusing on:
Gathering
Archiving
Documenting
Preserving university records since before its founding in 1967.
Context of the University of Lethbridge
Established as a Centennial University in 1967.
Historical development was preceded by numerous initiatives including:
Architectural studies
Proposals
Discussions leading to the formation of the university.
Original plans developed by the architectural firm of Arthur Eriksson (Ericsson Massey Firm).
Significance of archives:
Institutional history
Campus development documentation
Collaboration with Canadian Architectural Archives at University of Calgary.
Current Role of Michael Perry:
Continues to assist researchers and scholars in accessing the university's history.
Responsibilities of Michael Perry
Documentation of the university's official records.
Records illustrate the university's roles in:
Teaching
Research
Public service.
Current research interests focus on the university's history.
Michael Perry's Contributions
Founding member of the Center for Oral History and Tradition.
Lectures on institutional history, focusing on character building and definitions of history.
Previous presentation on the early history of the campus, including:
Prehistory
Development of the Ericsson Building.
Presentation Overview
Title of this evening's presentation: "We certainly didn't plan it this way"
Focus: Review of forty years of campus evolution and the unintended outcomes of the development plans.
Goals of the presentation:
Deconstruct the campus’s development.
Examine various designs and their implications.
Explore how reality diverged from original plans.
Historical Context and Original Campus Design
Initial setup included:
11 ATCO buildings on the South Campus (1967).
Temporary buildings lasted for around thirty-five years.
Initial campus size: 315 acres, shifted three times during development.
Landscape features included:
The geographical center designed as a karn to help orient students in poor weathered.
Examining Historical Development
Class distribution between campuses during early years:
1971 classes on both the South Campus and West Campus.
Transportation via yellow bus across campus before proper roads were constructed (Whoop Up Drive completed in 1976).
Original campus plan:
$17,500,000 allocated by Alberta government for construction.
Original funding for broader infrastructural development across three universities was $175,000,000 over five years, but U of L received a fraction (i.e. 10% of the planned funding).
Architectural Designs and Changes
Original Design by Arthur Ericsson:
Proposed two main buildings for Humanities and Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities areas.
Envisioned a central library and various functional spaces.
Initial development hurdles:
Funding limitations led to reduced architectural designs.
Shift from original grand designs to practical, smaller constructions due to financial constraints.
Major Changes Over Time
1969 design adjustments due to financial restrictions:
Shift to two half buildings with brick exteriors from Medicine Hat foundry, which become economically unfeasible.
Ultimate construction led to:
University Hall (initially called Academic and Residence Building) inaugurated as a central feature in campus layout.
Changes leading to eventual limitations in design versus original vision.
Timeline of Structural Developments
Campus expanded from 315 acres to approximately 565 acres over several decades.
Introduction of additional buildings:
University Hall (created multiple iterations pre-1980 branding).
Changes in student services:
Introduction and removal of unique structures like The Worm for ease of movement.
Observations on Landscape Design and User Experience
Early visual aesthetics, such as:
Use of yellow carpeting to represent the prairie landscape.
Spaces designed for open student-faculty interactions.
Realization of practical issues with outside environments:
Cold weather challenges faced in transitional structures (like The Worm).
Additional Architectural Developments
Notable structures:
Center for Fine Arts opened in 1981, adjusting the overall campus layout significantly.
Examination of student experiences and needs:
Limitations of on-campus facilities in proximity to activities (e.g., theatres).
Future Developments and Vision
Plans for ongoing development include:
Emphasis on accessibility and student convenience.
Modernization and enhancement of library and teaching spaces in alignment with original campus vision.
Discussion on the evolution of architectural design focusing on:
Creating spaces that facilitate student interaction and accessibility.
Technical Aspects and Economic Considerations
Exploration of budget management in constructing campus structures:
Example: University Hall built for just under $12,000,000 in 1969 values, highlighting evolution to potential multi-million dollar proposals today (i.e., current estimates for new developments range closer to $400,000,000).
Engagement and Feedback
Encouragement of discussion on preferred designs for new or redevelopment projects.
Asking for inquiries and comments on presented material, allowing for deeper understanding and sharing of experiences.
Conclusion
Reflection on the growth and transformation of the University of Lethbridge over the past forty years.
Anticipation for future developments based on accumulated historical and architectural insights.
Encouragement for continued engagement with the evolving campus narrative through student and faculty interaction.