Michael Perry (2) - Presentation on University Development

Presenter Introduction

  • Presenter: Michael Perry

  • Role: Archivist and Special Collections Librarian at the University Library

  • Commitment to the history of the university, focusing on:

    • Gathering

    • Archiving

    • Documenting

    • Preserving university records since before its founding in 1967.

Context of the University of Lethbridge

  • Established as a Centennial University in 1967.

  • Historical development was preceded by numerous initiatives including:

    • Architectural studies

    • Proposals

    • Discussions leading to the formation of the university.

  • Original plans developed by the architectural firm of Arthur Eriksson (Ericsson Massey Firm).

  • Significance of archives:

    • Institutional history

    • Campus development documentation

    • Collaboration with Canadian Architectural Archives at University of Calgary.

  • Current Role of Michael Perry:

    • Continues to assist researchers and scholars in accessing the university's history.

Responsibilities of Michael Perry

  • Documentation of the university's official records.

  • Records illustrate the university's roles in:

    • Teaching

    • Research

    • Public service.

  • Current research interests focus on the university's history.

Michael Perry's Contributions

  • Founding member of the Center for Oral History and Tradition.

  • Lectures on institutional history, focusing on character building and definitions of history.

  • Previous presentation on the early history of the campus, including:

    • Prehistory

    • Development of the Ericsson Building.

Presentation Overview

  • Title of this evening's presentation: "We certainly didn't plan it this way"

  • Focus: Review of forty years of campus evolution and the unintended outcomes of the development plans.

  • Goals of the presentation:

    • Deconstruct the campus’s development.

    • Examine various designs and their implications.

    • Explore how reality diverged from original plans.

Historical Context and Original Campus Design

  • Initial setup included:

    • 11 ATCO buildings on the South Campus (1967).

    • Temporary buildings lasted for around thirty-five years.

  • Initial campus size: 315 acres, shifted three times during development.

  • Landscape features included:

    • The geographical center designed as a karn to help orient students in poor weathered.

Examining Historical Development

  • Class distribution between campuses during early years:

    • 1971 classes on both the South Campus and West Campus.

    • Transportation via yellow bus across campus before proper roads were constructed (Whoop Up Drive completed in 1976).

  • Original campus plan:

    • $17,500,000 allocated by Alberta government for construction.

    • Original funding for broader infrastructural development across three universities was $175,000,000 over five years, but U of L received a fraction (i.e. 10% of the planned funding).

Architectural Designs and Changes

  • Original Design by Arthur Ericsson:

    • Proposed two main buildings for Humanities and Social Sciences and Arts and Humanities areas.

    • Envisioned a central library and various functional spaces.

  • Initial development hurdles:

    • Funding limitations led to reduced architectural designs.

    • Shift from original grand designs to practical, smaller constructions due to financial constraints.

Major Changes Over Time

  • 1969 design adjustments due to financial restrictions:

    • Shift to two half buildings with brick exteriors from Medicine Hat foundry, which become economically unfeasible.

  • Ultimate construction led to:

    • University Hall (initially called Academic and Residence Building) inaugurated as a central feature in campus layout.

    • Changes leading to eventual limitations in design versus original vision.

Timeline of Structural Developments

  • Campus expanded from 315 acres to approximately 565 acres over several decades.

  • Introduction of additional buildings:

    • University Hall (created multiple iterations pre-1980 branding).

  • Changes in student services:

    • Introduction and removal of unique structures like The Worm for ease of movement.

Observations on Landscape Design and User Experience

  • Early visual aesthetics, such as:

    • Use of yellow carpeting to represent the prairie landscape.

    • Spaces designed for open student-faculty interactions.

  • Realization of practical issues with outside environments:

    • Cold weather challenges faced in transitional structures (like The Worm).

Additional Architectural Developments

  • Notable structures:

    • Center for Fine Arts opened in 1981, adjusting the overall campus layout significantly.

  • Examination of student experiences and needs:

    • Limitations of on-campus facilities in proximity to activities (e.g., theatres).

Future Developments and Vision

  • Plans for ongoing development include:

    • Emphasis on accessibility and student convenience.

    • Modernization and enhancement of library and teaching spaces in alignment with original campus vision.

  • Discussion on the evolution of architectural design focusing on:

    • Creating spaces that facilitate student interaction and accessibility.

Technical Aspects and Economic Considerations

  • Exploration of budget management in constructing campus structures:

    • Example: University Hall built for just under $12,000,000 in 1969 values, highlighting evolution to potential multi-million dollar proposals today (i.e., current estimates for new developments range closer to $400,000,000).

Engagement and Feedback

  • Encouragement of discussion on preferred designs for new or redevelopment projects.

  • Asking for inquiries and comments on presented material, allowing for deeper understanding and sharing of experiences.

Conclusion

  • Reflection on the growth and transformation of the University of Lethbridge over the past forty years.

  • Anticipation for future developments based on accumulated historical and architectural insights.

  • Encouragement for continued engagement with the evolving campus narrative through student and faculty interaction.