Project Management, Lean & JIT Comprehensive Study Notes

Project Management & Supply Chain Interface

  • Supply‐chain questions driving project success:
    • When is equipment or supplies required within the project timeline?
    • Exactly how much lead-time is necessary for every item or activity?
    • When should purchase orders be released to suppliers?
    • Is there exposure to disruption anywhere in the supply chain for equipment, materials, or labour?
    • Direct link to Supply & Demand planning: poor answers inflate inventory, extend durations, or create stock-outs.

Project Scheduling Tools: Gantt, AON, Critical Path

  • Sample House-Construction Gantt (selected lines)
    • Overall task: “Construction of a House” — Duration=20  days,  Start=Feb 13,  End=Mar 12\text{Duration}=20\;\text{days},\;\text{Start}=\text{Feb }13,\;\text{End}=\text{Mar }12
    • Internal Work Package (18 d, Feb 13 – Mar 10)
    • Electrical (12 d, Feb 13 – Feb 28)
      • Rough-in electrical (4 d)
      • Install & terminate (3 d)
      • HVAC equipment (5 d)
    • Plumbing (18 d, Feb 13 – Mar 10)
      • Rough-in plumbing (3 d)
      • Set fixtures (4 d, Mar 3 – Mar 6)
      • Test & clean (2 d, Mar 7 – Mar 10)
    • Foundation (10 d, Feb 13 – Feb 26)
    • Excavate (6 d)
      • Pour concrete (3 d, Feb 13 – Feb 17)
      • Cure & strip forms (3 d, Feb 18 – Feb 20)
    • Steel erection (10 d)
      • Steel columns (2 d, Feb 21 – Feb 24)
      • Beams (4 d, Feb 21 – Feb 26)
  • Activity-on-Node (AON) network (Figure 3.20):
    • Each node shows: Earliest Start (ES), Earliest Finish (EF), Latest Start (LS), Latest Finish (LF), Step Duration.
  • Critical Path illustration:
    • Path Start → A → C → E → G → End is critical; total project time =15  units=15\;\text{units}.
    • Slack values displayed per node (e.g., D & B each have 1 unit slack; H has 0; etc.).
  • “Slack” (float) concept:
    • Slack=LSES=LFEF\text{Slack}=LS-ES=LF-EF — time a task can slip without delaying the whole project.

Project Management Learning Outcomes (Week Theme)

  • Describe how supply-chain variability influences project performance.
  • Clarify the supply-chain manager’s role inside projects.
  • Determine the critical path & identify slack.
  • Explain factors that lead to good project management practice (communication, risk planning, cross-functional alignment, etc.).

Lean, JIT & Toyota Production System Overview

  • Two linked courses this week: “Quality 1 – Lean & Just-in-Time”.
  • Lean production definition:
    • Integrated set of activities designed to produce high volume with minimal inventories.
    • Goal: Highest quality, lowest cost, shortest lead-time by eliminating Muda (waste).
  • JIT (Just-in-Time) inventory model:
    • Produce/ship exactly what the customer needs, exactly when needed, in exactly the required quantity.
  • Toyota Production System pillars:
    1. Stability & Standardization
    2. Jidoka (quality at source)
    3. JIT production (pull, Kanban, small lots, mixed-model, visual mgmt, TPM, Poka-Yoke, 5S, root-cause analysis)
    4. Involvement & respect for people (lifetime employment, level payroll, bonuses, unions, viewing workers as assets).

Lean Learning Outcomes

  • Illustrate lean concepts in manufacturing & supply-chain contexts.
  • Identify example wastes (Ohno’s 7 + 1).
  • Transition from Make-to-Stock (MTS) to Make-to-Order (MTO).
  • Explain Kanban flow & JIT inventory principles.

Lean Logic: Push vs Pull

  • Lean axiom: “Nothing is produced until it is needed.”
    1. A customer sale pulls a unit from the final finished-goods spot.
    2. This triggers production of a replacement downstream, cascading pulls upstream.
  • Push (MTS): build to schedule/forecast; inventories exist at each echelon.
  • Pull (MTO): demand signal travels upstream; no work released until downstream authorizes.
  • Kanban: visual signal (card, empty bin) authorizing upstream replenishment — functions like a “supermarket” of controlled inventory.

Lean Tools & Concepts

  • Jidoka (Autonomation): stop line, fix, find root cause, permanent solution.
  • Poka-Yoke: mistake-proofing; 100%100\% inspection with immediate feedback.
  • Heijunka: production leveling; calculate takt time =Available timeCustomer demand=\dfrac{\text{Available time}}{\text{Customer demand}}.
  • Standardized work, visual management.
  • Kaizen blitz: short, intense improvement burst; Kaikaku: radical redesign.
  • 5S: Sort, Set-in-order, Shine, Standardize, Sustain.
  • Total Productive Maintenance (TPM): operator-owned equipment upkeep.

Waste (Muda): Taiichi Ohno’s 7 + 1 & TIMWOODS Mnemonic

  • Over-production (T): producing ahead of demand.
  • Waiting (I): idle time in queues.
  • Transportation (M): unnecessary moves.
  • Over-processing (W): redundant operations.
  • Inventory (O): excess WIP, FG, safety stock.
  • Motion (O): unnecessary human/robot movement.
  • Defects (D): rework, scrap, warranty.
  • Skills Underutilized (S): untapped human potential.
  • Shigeo Shingo quote: only the last turn of a nut tightens the bolt; the preceding turns are waste.

Variability & JIT Buffering

  • Variability sources: customer demand fluctuation, operations output variation, material quality issues.
  • Typical counter-measures in non-lean systems: extra safety stock, rework, scrap.
  • Lean response: attack root causes instead of buffering with inventory.

Case Study: Whirlpool – Sears Dryers (1994/95) — Push to Pull Transition

  • BEFORE (Push/MTS):
    • Long production runs, large lots, traditional line, extended firm lead-time.
    • Single-model truckloads from Cambridge plant to Sears DCs on VMI basis.
    • PO’s based on forecast; high FG at plant & DC; weekly truck transfers.
  • TRANSITION STEPS:
    1. Customer orders captured daily & centralized.
    2. Plant shifts to cellular layout, short runs, “lot size = 1”.
    3. DC becomes cross-dock; mixed-model TLs shipped daily.
    4. Blanket order remains, but individual consumer orders dropped on factory for next-day delivery.
  • AFTER (Pull/MTO):
    • Responsive supply chain, short firm time, double-digit Inventory-Turnover Ratio.
    • Mixed truckloads, minimal FG, make-to-order.

JIT Concepts Across Core Processes

  1. Manufacturing:
    • Lot size reduction, SMED, cellular work cells, leveled/mixed model, aggregate planning, postponement, visual Kanban, TPM.
  2. Product Design:
    • Design for manufacturing, robust design, yield maximization, parts standardization/modularity, sustainability/EOL.
  3. Logistics Network:
    • Cross-dock, mixed TL/LTL, inbound milk-runs, Supply Chain Event Mgmt (SCEM) alerts, compliance-based metrics.
  4. Supply Base:
    • Partnerships, CPFR, short-lead replenishment, supplier sequenced delivery, co-location.
  5. Quality Programs:
    • Cost of quality components (prevention, appraisal, internal & external failure), quality at source, mistake-proofing, 5S culture.

Benefits & Risks of JIT (Pull)

  • Benefits:
    • Simplified scheduling; responds only to real demand; no item-level forecast (family-level still needed).
    • Makes quality & capacity problems visible immediately.
    • Prevents WIP from piling at bottlenecks.
  • Risks:
    • Greater exposure to catastrophic events (strikes, fires, borders, weather).
    • Higher dependency on suppliers; tougher to globalize sourcing.
    • Cost pressure (smaller lots, increased shipments).
    • Requires cultural change for both management & shop floor.
    • Not all processes/suppliers are JIT candidates; MTS may still be optimal when coordination costs or variability are high.

JIT Outcomes

  • Quantifiable:
    • Smaller lot sizes, shorter lead times, lower inventories, reduced scrap, Lower Total Cost\text{Lower Total Cost}.
  • Intangible:
    • Empowered teams, culture of zero waste, improved revenues & customer satisfaction.

Visual Metaphors & Media Cues

  • “Sea of Inventory” graphic: high inventory hides rejects, poor layouts, breakdowns, over-processing, poor capacity, waiting, skill gaps, delays.
  • Bloomberg Quicktake “How Toyota Changed The Way We Make Things” & other YouTube links reinforce historical context.
  • Kahoot & video examples used for interactive learning.

Wrap-Up: Variance + Waste = Enemies of Lean

  • Lean strives to eliminate both variance (unpredictable outcomes) and waste (predictable but unnecessary activities).
  • Achieving stability, flow, and pull converts a push, forecast-driven system into a responsive, cost-efficient one.