Note
0.0(0)
study
Chat with Kai
study
View the linked video
RB

New Recording 60

Free Will and Determinism

  • Concept of Free Will

    • Human perception of potential choices affects our feeling of control over future decisions.

    • Examples of choices: Completing community college vs pursuing a PhD.

  • Debates in Philosophy

    • Difficulties for libertarianism arise when questioning the nature of actions if they are not caused.

    • Randomness does not equate to freedom. Acknowledges the challenge:

      • If actions are random, they lack intentionality.

      • Libertarians argue actions can be tied to purposes and intentions.

  • Connection between Intentions and Actions

    • Key question: How do intentions affect actions without causing them?

    • If intentions don't cause actions, their influence remains unclear.

Philosophical Stances on Free Will

  • Hard Determinism

    • Claims free will does not exist—it's an illusion.

    • Argues life events are determined by causal chains beyond personal control.

  • Soft Determinism

    • Affirms that while determinism exists, we still experience a sense of free will.

    • Accepts that some choices involve genuine freedom despite determinism’s restrictions.

  • Libertarianism

    • Differentiates itself by asserting that not all actions are predetermined.

    • Proposes that at least some actions allow genuine choice, enabling one to affect future outcomes.

Distinction Between Views

  • Existence of Free Will

    • Hard Determinism: No free will.

    • Soft Determinism and Libertarianism: Yes, some form of free will exists.

  • Truth of Determinism

    • Hard Determinism and Soft Determinism agree on the truth of determinism.

    • Libertarian view: Determinism applies to some areas but not all human actions.

  • Definition of Free Action

    • Hard Determinism and Libertarianism: Free actions are those under the control of the agent and not predetermined.

    • Soft Determinists argue that actions can still be free even if they are influenced by larger deterministic forces.

The Nature of Free Will and Morality

  • Frankfurt's Principle of Alternate Possibilities

    • Morally responsible only if one could have acted otherwise. Challenges hard determinism.

    • Introduces the concept of moral responsibility even when determinism appears absolute.

  • Example of Black and Jones

    • Scenario where Black manipulates Jones to commit a bank robbery.

    • Critique of whether determinism precludes moral responsibility.

    • Frankfurt argues that even without alternate possibilities, Jones retains moral responsibility due to his intentions.

Implications for Criminal Justice

  • Determinism's Influence on Justice

    • Addresses the moral consequences of actions in a deterministic world.

    • Suggests legal systems must exist to maintain social order and protect citizens, regardless of moral culpability.

Hume's View on Free Will**

  • Mental Processes

    • Hume posits that the mind consists of a bundle of impressions (beliefs, desires).

    • Actions are influenced by the strongest desire among competing motivations.

    • Flexibility of will—potentially acting differently with different strongest desires.

  • Critique of Libertarianism

    • Challenges the libertarian notion that the self (the I) is separate and in control.

    • Questions how free choices can emerge from a deterministic framework of desires.

Conclusion

  • The discourse on free will involves nuanced positions about human agency, responsibility, and the relationship between determinism and personal freedom.

  • Key implications for ethics, legal structures, and social expectations surface within this debate.

Note
0.0(0)
study
Chat with Kai
study
View the linked video