Planetary Health Education in Nursing – Comprehensive Study Notes

Background and Historical Context

  • ‘Planetary health’ emerged from Indigenous knowledge and environmental/holistic movements of the 1970s1970{\text{s}}1990s1990{\text{s}}.
  • Term underscores the disruptive decoupling between human health and Earth’s natural systems.
  • Planetary Health Alliance (PHA) definition: “solutions-oriented, trans-disciplinary field and social movement focused on analyzing and addressing the impacts of destabilized natural systems on human health and all life on Earth.”
  • Anthropocene: new geological epoch—human activities drive climate change (Crutzen 20062006; Lewis & Maslin 20152015).
  • Lancet Countdown 20242024: escalating life-threatening weather events (flooding, wildfires, droughts, heatwaves) → infectious diseases, food insecurity, forced migration, mental/physical harm.
  • Nurses constitute the largest global health workforce; hold unique positions for advocacy, policy influence, family/community engagement, and direct care (Neal-Boylan et al. 20192019; Rogers 20212021).
  • International Council of Nurses (ICN) 20182018 & 20242024: urgent calls to embed climate and sustainability into nursing education/practice.

Aim of the Scoping Review

  • Research Question: “How has planetary health education been implemented and contextualized in nursing education?”

Methodology

Design & Frameworks

  • Scoping review guided by Arksey & O’Malley 55-stage framework.
  • Followed PRISMA-ScR checklist and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations.
  • Additional guidance from Peters et al. (20152015; 2020a2020a; 2020b2020b).

Search Strategy

  • Time of systematic search: 13132121 Nov 20242024 (preliminary searches Oct 20242024).
  • Databases: Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, Education Source, MEDLINE, ERIC (all via EBSCO) + ScienceDirect.
  • Framework: PCC (Population – nursing education; Concept – planetary health; Context – learning strategies).
  • Boolean logic sample (Education Source): combined S<em>7 OR S</em>8 OR S<em>9S<em>7 \text{ OR } S</em>8 \text{ OR } S<em>9 then S</em>11=S<em>7 AND S</em>8 AND S9S</em>{11}=S<em>7 \text{ AND } S</em>8 \text{ AND } S_9271271 peer-reviewed hits.

Study Selection Process

  • Total records identified 25902590.
  • Duplicates removed 957957 (EndNote) + 55 (Rayyan) → 962962.
  • Titles/abstracts screened 16281628.
  • Full-text assessed 8383.
  • Excluded 5050 (wrong population 77, context 1717, concept 22, publication type 2020, language 44).
  • Final inclusion 3333 studies.
  • Screening used Rayyan blind mode; conflicts resolved by consensus.
  • Quality appraisal not conducted (scoping reviews map breadth irrespective of quality).

Data Charting & Analysis

  • Manual iterative extraction: author, year, aim, methodology, participants, educational focus, learning design, key findings.
  • Descriptive analytical approach → 66 themes agreed upon by full team.

Characteristics of Included Studies

Publication Trends & Geography

  • 2020 studies 2001200120212021; surge 2022202220242024 with 1313 more.
  • Country distribution: USA 1818, Spain 44, UK 44, Australia 22, Canada 11, Egypt 11; cross-country designs 22.

Methodological Designs

  • Case study 2020 (incl. 66 with surveys).
  • Cohort 33; quasi-experimental 33; cross-sectional 22; time-series 11; quantitative pre/post 11; mixed-methods 11; qualitative focus groups 11; document analysis 11.

Education Levels & Focus Areas

  • Undergraduate-only 1919; graduate-only 66; mixed undergrad/grad 66.
  • Topical foci: climate change 99; community & environmental health 66; vulnerable populations 33; waste management 22; pesticide poisoning 22; gardening/ecology 11; SDGs 11; humanitarian emergencies 11; global/planetary dimensions 11; energy use 11; sustainable management 11; healthcare sustainability 11; Anthropocene 11.

Thematic Learning Approaches

Scenario-Based Learning (SBL)

  • 1111 studies.
  • Used real-world complex problems; rooted in situated learning.
  • Foci: climate change & sustainability, waste management, children’s environmental health, pesticide exposure, neighbourhood climate impacts.
  • Outcomes: heightened awareness, systems thinking; barriers – low confidence translating to practice.

Simulation-Based Learning (Sim)

  • 44 studies; safe role-play & debrief.
  • Modalities: SimCity software; primary-care pesticide poisoning; waste-reduction labs; public-health disaster scenarios.
  • Gains: critical thinking, global citizenship values, SDG integration, practical application of public-health principles.

Student-Active Hybrid Approaches

  • 77 studies blending online & face-to-face.
  • Strategies: flipped classroom, peer teaching, blogging, online discussions, problem-based mentoring, reflective team projects.
  • Addressed gap in faculty expertise; empowered student-led inquiry.

Field Trips & Practice Experience

  • 77 studies.
  • Sites: air-pollution districts, poison centers, occupational clinics, hospital ventilation systems, community gardens.
  • Students produced blogs, reflections, projects linking SDGs to practice; reported personal & professional growth.

Film-Based Engagement

  • 55 studies.
  • Tools: documentaries, true-story movies, video interviews.
  • Topics: climate-mental-health nexus, toxicology ethics, political unrest, water safety.
  • Arts-based pedagogy amplified marginalized voices; facilitated legal/ethical discourse.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration

  • 99 studies.
  • Participants: nursing, allied-health, public-health, engineering, nutrition, PT/OT etc.
  • Outputs: joint courses, ambassador trainings, certificate programs.
  • Benefits: broader world-view, co-creation of climate solutions, faculty development.

Cross-Cutting Insights & Significance

  • Experiential, participatory, socially-oriented pedagogy is central to planetary-health competence.
  • Systems thinking, advocacy, and sustainability are critical yet under-confident domains for students.
  • Indigenous perspectives scarcely represented—identified curricular gap.
  • Western-centric literature dominates; paucity from low-/middle-income nations despite disproportionate vulnerability.
  • Nursing educators themselves often lack formal training → need capacity-building.

Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications

  • Equity & social justice: climate impacts greatest on children, older adults, disabled, economically marginalized, and those in fragile ecosystems—aligns with nursing’s mandate to protect vulnerable groups.
  • Planetary-health lens expands patient-centered care toward eco-centric, systems-level responsibility.
  • Professional duty: nurses to lead waste reduction, green advocacy, and policy influence within health systems.

Numerical & Statistical Highlights (LaTeX-formatted)

  • Total records identified 25902590.
  • Duplicates removed 962962.
  • Records screened 16281628; full texts assessed 8383; studies included 3333.
  • Thematic groups 66.
  • Scenario-based studies 1111; Simulation 44; Hybrid 77; Field/Practice 77; Film 55; Interdisciplinary 99.

Identified Gaps & Challenges

  • Limited graduate-level, longitudinal, and practice-embedded evaluations.
  • Scarcity of research from Africa, Asia (outside Middle East), Latin America.
  • Underrepresentation of Indigenous knowledge and local ecological wisdom.
  • Students report difficulty applying sustainability knowledge in real clinical contexts; confidence deficits.
  • Few studies formally measure competency acquisition or patient/outcome impact.

Recommendations for Nursing Education

  • Integrate planetary-health across entire curricula, not isolated modules.
  • Use multi-modal active strategies: SBL, Sim, field immersion, arts-based reflection, community projects.
  • Embed systems-thinking, advocacy training, and policy literacy.
  • Foster interdisciplinary and Indigenous partnerships to contextualize content.
  • Provide faculty development programs; leverage toolkits (e.g., Nurses Climate Challenge) for educator readiness.

Recommendations for Future Research

  • Conduct longitudinal, mixed-methods studies tracing knowledge–confidence–practice translation.
  • Evaluate planetary-health competencies using validated instruments.
  • Investigate curricular models in low-/middle-income and climate-vulnerable regions.
  • Explore Indigenous-led pedagogies and knowledge integration.
  • Assess patient, community, and environmental outcomes of nurse-led planetary-health interventions.

Concluding Takeaways

  • Innovative, student-active and interdisciplinary approaches are essential to prepare nurses for the planetary-health era.
  • Advocacy, systems thinking, and sustainability must be elevated in nursing education to meet current and future global health threats.
  • Broader, inclusive research and curricular efforts required to build resilient, eco-conscious nursing workforces worldwide.